Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Marvel.

‘Wakanda Forever’ may be more of a letdown than Rotten Tomatoes indicates

How does 'Wakanda Forever' hold up against the original 'Black Panther'?

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever is generating a lot of hype from fans, especially considering its nose-bleedingly high Rotten Tomatoes score. But some are questioning whether the film will truly live up to its predecessor, in light of a more nuanced grade from the other major review aggregate site: Metacritic.

Recommended Videos

Wakanda Forever‘s Metacritic score compared to the first movie paints a picture of a movie sequel that doesn’t live up to the original, by a country mile. While both films were in the 90s on Rotten Tomatoes, there is a wider disparity over on Metacritic.

Since RT is based on a binary aggregation indicating the percentage of critics giving the film a passing grade, on a rough pass/no-pass basis, the more nuanced Metacritic score is closer to what we can consider a traditional letter grade. By this metric, 2018’s Black Panther has an 88/100 on Metacritic but Wakanda Forever only has a 70/100 on the same site. That would be a high “B” compared to a low “C,” respectively, if they were letter grades. This is due to Metacritic assigning each movie review a score out of 100, then averaging all of them together, rather than designating reviews as either “Rotten” or “Fresh,” like on Rotten Tomatoes.

Also of note, Black Panther is “certified fresh” on Rotten Tomatoes (96 percent) and a “Metacritic must-see,” but the same honors have not been bestowed on Wakanda Forever (91 percent on RT). It’s still early days for Wakanda Forever, however, so those certifications of approval could still be added later. And it’s also worth clarifying more reviews will likely come out for Wakanda Forever as time goes on, so its RT and Metacritic scores could go up or down depending on the reception.

One Twitter user called Wakanda Forever‘s relatively low Metacritic score, compared to the original, “a lot more interesting” than the somewhat unsurprisingly fresh RT score.

One Marvel fanatic was completely undeterred by the somewhat middling Metacritic score, indicating they’re already making plans for watching Wakanda Forever in just “A couple more days.”

https://twitter.com/Lottie_Twee/status/1590251079572557824?s=20&t=Cb11MjfA2Wroe-5N5YOMwg

Another commentator said the Metacritic score was “Actually higher than expected.”

But that did not stop one Twitter user from pointing out the significant dip in the score compared to the first movie.

It was a debatable point amongst a couple of other movie fanatics whether Wakanda Forever‘s 70-something Metacritic score was a bellwether for the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s downfall or simply par for the course at this point.

We’re still pumped for Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, and we’re excited to secure our own tickets for the film’s release on Nov. 11, but this whole Rotten Tomatoes/Metacritic debate is an interesting one to consider nonetheless when it comes to cinema’s modern superhero franchises.

You can read our four-star review of the movie here.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson covers entertainment news for WGTC and has previously enjoyed writing about housing, homelessness, the coronavirus pandemic, historic 2020 Oregon wildfires, and racial justice protests. Originally from Juneau, Alaska, Danny received his Bachelor's degree in English Literature from the University of Alaska Southeast and a Master's in Multimedia Journalism from the University of Oregon. He has written for The Portland Observer, worked as a digital enterprise reporter at KOIN 6 News, and is the co-producer of the award-winning documentary 'Escape from Eagle Creek.'