RFK Jr. Replaces CDC vaccine panel with ‘experts’ who think measles parties are a good idea – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

RFK Jr. Replaces CDC vaccine panel with ‘experts’ who think measles parties are a good idea

What happened to the CDC?

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has replaced every member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) important vaccine advisory group, with people whose opinions on vaccine safety and effectiveness have worried many in the medical field. The ACIP has a key role in shaping public health policy by advising the CDC on which vaccines should be recommended for children and adults.

Recommended Videos

These recommendations directly affect which vaccines insurance companies cover and which ones are given for free to millions of low-income children through the government-funded Vaccines for Children program. The panel’s choices ultimately impact the health of every American, according to NPR.

Secretary Kennedy’s unusual move to remove all 17 members of the current ACIP and then appoint people who have openly questioned vaccines has caused widespread concern among immunization experts. Some of the new members became well-known during the COVID-19 pandemic for publicly disagreeing with government policies on school closures, lockdowns, and the use of mRNA vaccines. Additionally, at least one of the new appointees is connected to a group that actively warns about what they see as vaccine risks, which has added to fears about where the committee might be headed.

RFK Jr. has replaced the CDC committee with those friendly to his views

Experts in immunization and infectious diseases are very worried that the new committee’s existing doubts about vaccines could lead to less emphasis on certain vaccines. This, in turn, might make it harder for families to get potentially life-saving preventive care. The ACIP’s recommendations directly affect insurance coverage because the Affordable Care Act requires health insurers to cover all vaccines approved by the committee.

If the panel changes the current vaccine schedule, insurance might stop covering some vaccines, putting an extra financial strain on families. The panel’s advice also affects state-level policies, including which vaccines are required for children to attend school. If these recommendations become weaker, vaccination rates among school-aged children could drop, raising the risk of outbreaks of preventable diseases. The impact would be especially hard on vulnerable groups who depend on the Vaccines for Children program.

Any changes to the recommended vaccine schedule could create major obstacles for a large number of children in the United States, possibly undoing decades of progress in preventing diseases. Another big concern is the possibility that the new ACIP might change more vaccine recommendations to what is called “shared clinical decision-making.” Routine recommendations usually say that everyone in a certain risk group should get a specific vaccine unless there’s a medical reason not to. “Shared clinical decision-making,” however, means the doctor and patient decide together whether the vaccine is right for them.

This kind of change could have serious effects on vaccine availability, especially in rural areas. Many family doctors in these areas already struggle financially to keep vaccines in stock, and a shift to shared clinical decision-making could make them even less likely to do so. The way the ACIP phrases its recommendations also plays a big role in how doctors talk to patients about vaccines. Routine recommendations give a clear and straightforward message, making it easier for healthcare providers to explain the importance of vaccines to families.

A move toward shared clinical decision-making, on the other hand, could create uncertainty and confusion, making it harder for families to make informed decisions. Some argue that when medical professionals seem unsure about whether a vaccine is necessary, it can create distrust and make families less likely to follow vaccination advice. There is concern that switching to shared clinical decision-making will create doubt about vaccines with strong safety and effectiveness records.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jorge Aguilar
Jorge Aguilar
Aggy has worked for multiple sites as a writer and editor, and has been a managing editor for sites that have millions of views a month. He's been the Lead of Social Content for a site garnering millions of views a month, and co owns multiple successful social media channels, including a Gaming news TikTok, and a Facebook Fortnite page with over 700k followers. His work includes Dot Esports, Screen Rant, How To Geek Try Hard Guides, PC Invasion, Pro Game Guides, Android Police, N4G, WePC, Sportskeeda, and GFinity Esports. He has also published two games under Tales and is currently working on one with Choice of Games. He has written and illustrated a number of books, including for children, and has a comic under his belt. He does not lean any one way politically; he just reports the facts and news, and gives an opinion based on those.