Donald Trump may have just hijacked the law to cast a wider net to catch and punish his opponents – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Donald Trump may have just hijacked the law to cast a wider net to catch and punish his opponents

When 'privilege, not a right' gets personal.

The Trump administration announced Tuesday that immigration officers will now screen applicants for green cards, visas, and other benefits for “anti-Americanism” and antisemitic views. The new policy gives U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers broad power to consider whether applicants have “endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused” views deemed anti-American when making decisions about immigration benefits.

Recommended Videos

The policy expands existing social media screening that began in June 2025 to include searches for “anti-American activity.” USCIS said officers will examine whether applicants have had “any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations” or whether there is evidence of antisemitic activity. The updated guidance applies to both new and pending applications for green cards, visas, and citizenship.

“America’s benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,” said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser, according to Fox News. He added that “immigration benefits, including to live and work in the United States, remain a privilege, not a right.” The agency said anti-American activity will be treated as “an overwhelmingly negative factor” when officers make discretionary decisions about immigration cases.

Critics warn policy gives officers too much subjective power

The announcement has sparked immediate concern among immigration lawyers and civil rights advocates who say the term “anti-Americanism” lacks clear definition in immigration law. The policy update did not provide specific criteria for what constitutes anti-American views, instead pointing to a section of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act that bans people linked to terrorism, antisemitism, or “world communism” from gaining citizenship.

“The term has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump administration,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council. Critics have compared the policy to McCarthyism of the 1950s, when suspicion of communism led to widespread investigations and prosecutions. Immigration attorney Steven Brown called American values “a subjective standard not found” in immigration law.

Online forums have already begun debating what actions might be considered anti-American under the new policy. Posts on Reddit questioned whether opposing recent military strikes or supporting a ceasefire in Gaza could be deemed anti-American or antisemitic. Others worried that criticizing Trump administration policies or sharing satirical content about political figures might be used against applicants. Professor Jane Lilly Lopez of Brigham Young University warned that the policy “opens the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions.”

The policy comes as part of broader Trump administration efforts to tighten immigration enforcement. The State Department has revoked more than 6,000 student visas this year, and officials announced they would expand social media vetting for all immigration applicants. In January, Trump signed executive orders targeting antisemitism on college campuses and threatening to deport foreign students involved in pro-Palestinian protests. The administration has also begun what it calls the largest immigration enforcement operation in U.S. history, with ICE arresting thousands of immigrants across the country.

Immigration lawyers predict the new screening policy will face legal challenges in federal courts. Ruby Robinson of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center argued that constitutional rights apply to all people in the United States regardless of immigration status. “A lot of this administration’s activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,” Robinson said. However, some legal experts note that the administration has broad authority to interpret immigration law and set screening criteria for people seeking to enter or remain in the country.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sadik Hossain
Sadik Hossain
Freelance Writer
Sadik Hossain is a professional writer with over 7 years of experience in numerous fields. He has been following political developments for a very long time. To convert his deep interest in politics into words, he has joined We Got This Covered recently as a political news writer and wrote quite a lot of journal articles within a very short time. His keen enthusiasm in politics results in delivering everything from heated debate coverage to real-time election updates and many more.