‘I don’t want to have security on me’: Why lawmakers are rejecting protection even as political violence explodes

Congressional lawmakers are facing tough decisions about their safety following recent violent incidents, as political tensions continue to escalate under the current administration, including shootings in Minnesota that killed a state representative and her husband while wounding a state senator and his wife.

According to Politico, despite the growing threats, many lawmakers are hesitant to accept additional security measures that would change their daily lives and limit their interactions with the public. This resistance comes even as threats against members of Congress reached over 9,400 in 2024, amid growing concerns about authoritarian tendencies in American politics.

“I don’t want to have security on me. I’m a very private person. I like to go outside and be by myself,” said Senator Markwayne Mullin, who leads the Senate appropriations subcommittee that funds Capitol Police. His statement reflects a common sentiment among lawmakers who value their freedom and privacy.

Security programs see low participation despite rising threats

The House and Senate have programs offering security updates for lawmakers’ primary residences and coordination with local police for district events. However, many lawmakers don’t take advantage of these resources. More than half of House members used the home security program last year, but others found the paperwork too demanding or weren’t interested.

The Capitol Police have agreements with more than 100 state and local police departments nationwide, but this covers only a portion of what’s needed to protect all members in their home districts. The department has requested $967.8 million for fiscal 2026, marking a 22 percent increase from current funding levels.

Senator Richard Blumenthal supports additional security resources but emphasizes they must not interfere with lawmakers’ work. “I have no intention of changing the way I live or do my job, because accessibility is part of who I am as a public official,” he said, while acknowledging that many of his colleagues are scared.

For some lawmakers, security measures have already become part of daily life. Senator Mullin revealed that his house has bulletproof glass, cameras everywhere, and security dogs. “It is, unfortunately, the reality we live in,” he said, highlighting the difficult balance between safety and maintaining a normal life as a public servant.

The situation forces lawmakers to make a choice between accepting more protection, which could limit their freedom and privacy, or maintaining their current lifestyle while facing increased risks. As threats continue to rise, this dilemma becomes more pressing for members of Congress who must weigh their personal safety against their ability to serve their constituents effectively.