Trump once again declares climate science as a hoax because the same scientists he called frauds for years updated a spreadsheet that aligned with his agenda – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by The White House, Public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.

Trump once again declares climate science as a hoax because the same scientists he called frauds for years updated a spreadsheet that aligned with his agenda

Wrong about the science, wrong about the planet, wrong about everything.

After climate scientists quietly retired one of their worst-case emissions models — not because the planet stopped warming, but because clean energy adoption made the scenario’s assumptions outdated — Donald Trump took to Truth Social to declare victory over science.

Recommended Videos

“GOOD RIDDANCE!” Trump screamed into the void in all caps, informing his followers that the United Nations had just admitted its climate projections were “WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!”

He then promised that his administration “will always be based on TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT!” And you can believe him, because the words were, uh, in all caps.

So, it turns out that the man who spent the better part of a decade calling climate scientists frauds and liars will defer to them the moment they produce something he can misquote.

What actually happened is considerably less dramatic and considerably more embarrassing. The international committee responsible for feeding climate scenarios into IPCC modeling published a next-generation framework that retired the most extreme emissions pathway, known as RCP8.5 — a worst-case model that assumed, among other things, a near-fivefold expansion of global coal use through 2100 and a global population approaching 13 billion.

As actual renewable energy costs dropped and global emissions tracked lower than the scenario’s runaway assumptions, scientists updated their models accordingly. That is, by definition, how science is supposed to work. It is not, by any definition, a confession that climate change is fake.

So, the very crucial detail Trump is omitting — as he always does, as he always lies — is what the replacement models project. According to the estimates, the new HIGH scenario in the replacement CMIP7 framework still projects roughly 3°C of warming by 2100. Three degrees Celsius, or in plain English, our planet is still getting hotter, and catastrophically so

Scientists simply looked at the worst-case scenario and concluded it was too pessimistic based on new developments. They then updated their framework, and that framework still projects human catastrophe.

Trump read the headline, skipped the rest, and truly thought that the new report vindicated his anti-science, head-in-the-sand outlook.

It’s worth reiterating that the scientists who developed and retired RCP8.5 are the same community Trump and his MAGA cronies have spent years denouncing as radical alarmists running a political con. At this point, they really need to make up their minds about who we can trust when it comes to the climate.

The scientists are frauds until they do something he likes, at which point they are the “United Nations TOP Climate Committee” whose word is apparently gospel.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author
Image of Jonathan Wright
Jonathan Wright
Jonathan is a religious consumer of movies, TV shows, video games, and speculative fiction. And when he isn't doing that, he likes to write about them. He can get particularly worked up when talking about 'The Lord of the Rings' or 'A Song of Ice and Fire' or any work of high fantasy, come to think of it.