Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Stitchers Season 2 Review

In a post-Hunger Games world, Stitchers, which returns to Freeform for its second season on March 22, should be hitting the jackpot. With a mythology that is part CSI, part Minority Report, and a heroine that is prickly and beautiful, it seems as though the series has every piece it needs ride the wave that modern YA fiction created right into the hearts of Freeform’s engaged teen viewers. However, while the show might sound like a hit on paper, the result is a messy combination of plot points and a tone that talks down to its teen audience. There are plenty of examples of smart, mythology-heavy procedurals made for teens, unfortunately Stitchers just isn’t one of them.
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

Stitchers season 2 -2

Recommended Videos

The biggest problem with Stitchers isn’t the logical leaps it forces its audience to take, or the show’s reliance on Emma Ishta’s facial reactions – which somehow manage to be equal parts wooden and cartoonish. Instead, the series seems utterly incapable of telling stories by showing the audience how the characters are feeling, and consequently resorts to stating everything outright.

As the title hints, “2.0” deals with many of the characters trying on an improved version of themselves, including Kirsten, who has become more compassionate after gaining the ability to feel human emotion, and Cameron, whose near-death experience has given him a new zest for life. However, instead of capitalizing on this setup to show how these profound emotional experiences could influence Kirsten and Cameron’s respective behaviors, or even how they approach their job, the show simply relies on exposition to do all the work. Sure, Kirsten tells the audience how difficult it is for her to deal with the new emotions she is feeling, and Camille, Linus and Cameron continuously mention how much better, different she is now, but we’re not given a real window into this struggle.

It’s difficult to tell if this flawed system of telling-not-showing is simply bad writing and storytelling, or if it’s a result of trying to dumb the show down for a teen audience (though whether there’s a difference there is a matter of opinion). Regardless, this type of storytelling can’t help but feel derivative and cheap – especially since it gets in the way of telling a much more compelling story. What happens to a person when they suddenly become plugged into their emotions? And, more importantly, if Kirsten’s inability to experience emotions was the sole factor that made her a perfect vessel for stitching, how will being able to feel impact her ability to do her job? It’s a missed opportunity for a rich exploration of character that the show squanders in favor of returning to its mystery-of-the-week structure.

Even more frustrating is Stitchers’ inability to settle on a distinctive tone. In its quest to appeal to a younger audience, the show adopts a Nickelodeon style of slapstick humor that sits unevenly against the show’s dark premise. While it is fairly natural for a procedural to gloss over the more morose facets of investigating murder, Stichers’ childlike humor makes the important jobs that the characters are supposed to be doing feel uncomfortably trivial. This is made even more evident by the fact that Linus, Cameron and Camille all seem to be the same brand of goofy-genius sidekick, with no real distinguishing personality traits, apart from Cameron’s affinity for quoting Scarface and Desi Arnaz.

Stitchers isn’t a show without potential. Its premise gives way to a personal spin on the procedural that can open the door to a wealth of stories – and conversations relating to memory, consent, and mental health. (The CW’s iZombie does a much better job of articulating and capitalizing upon a similar procedural setup.)

This show, in comparison, continually falls victim to lazy writing choices and an inability to establish tone, leaving the viewer utterly stranded in a haphazardly created mythology. If the promise of a procedural is to create a simple yet inviting world audience can spend an episode exploring without having to be a longtime fan, Stitchers, simply put, doesn’t make good on that promise. Stitchers may have potential, but it certainly hasn’t earned the trust of its audience enough to ensure they stick around.

Stitchers Season 2 Review
Stitchers continually falls victim to lazy writing choices and its inability to establish a steady tone, leaving the viewers stranded in a mythology that feels haphazardly created.

We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author