7 Disappointing Movies That Should Have Been Great

noomi rapace prometheus 7 Disappointing Movies That Should Have Been Great

Is there anything worse than being disappointed by a movie? Think of the ones you waited patiently and eagerly for, only to discover that everything you imagined in your head hadn’t made it up onto the screen. Like, at all. There are certain movies that had the odds weighed against them from the very start, and we’re not going to be dealing with those here: think George Lucas territory, what with The Phantom Menace and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. You willed them to be amazing, of course, but you knew the chances of success were on the lower end of the spectrum: in those cases, George Lucas is a generally lousy filmmaker, and the hype machine was in maximum overdrive.

But what about the flicks whose ingredients seemed perfectly placed, only for the final product to emerge mediocre in every sense? Motion pictures with marketing campaigns that made us feel as though their studios were promoting genuine classics? What about the movies that boasted an idea so brilliant that it seemed impossible for the filmmakers to screw it up? Here’s our pick of seven movies that fall into such a category: despite their esteemed cast and crew, each one failed to meet our (rightly) high expectations.

Continue reading on the next page…

Next
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Jacob S

    Prometheus was great. Big deal if they give questions, movies can have you think once awhile. There will be a sequel to the movie where it will most likely throw answers every where for people that can’t think.

    Public Enemies was great too.

    • http://www.facebook.com/paul.j.mason Paul J Mason

      I totally agree; this article assumes that people go into the show not expecting to be challenged. Not everything should be spoon-fed.

      • Jack Strawb

        You both missed the point.

        Prometheus asking questions it can’t answer was like your neighbor showing up, asking ‘where do we come from?’, than staggering off, mumbling to himself about sheep. There’s asking and not being able to answer completely, and then there’s not having the intellectual ability to even frame the question properly.

        Besides, no one over the age of 12 expects a work of art to answer with finality a question it raises; a serious work, though, will suggest an answer, a line of inquiry, or will reframe the very question it asks in order to show it in a new light… SOMETHING.

        Prometheus didn’t do any of that. It didn’t do any of that so egregiously it makes you wonder if its elderly director can no longer complete an assignment.

        • TB

          Exactly! Perfectly explained.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Tsun420 Daniel Wood

          Your a idiot if your going into a sci fi movie based off Alien and looking for everything to be explained (cause you know,EVERYTHING was explained in Alien right?). Stop pretending every little thing is a plot hole when it’s just painting a bigger picture. In Prometheus you learn as much as your protagonist and it doesn’t change the ride if you will. Let’s call it what it is, people hate Prometheus because it didn’t have any Aliens in it. Right? That’s exactly right.

          You guys dissect Prometheus like you think it’s a religion or something, its a god damn sci fi movie.

          • Stephen Suggs

            Which is a shame because, at the end, it DID have Aliens. Everyone got the prequel they were itching for, PLUS a whole movie around it that could veer off into it’s own mythos. And yet people weren’t satisfied.

          • NCBrian

            i’d work out my understanding of contractions vs pronouns before calling people idiots on the internet.
            of course, that’s just me.

          • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

            word!

          • Laughed

            Are you Ridley Scott? Did you have a personal investment in the development of this movie? If not, you seriously need to calm down.

          • Squiggly_P

            I know it’s been 4 months, but I just read the article so…

            The thing about Prometheus isn’t that it leaves you with questions. Leaving the audience with some interesting things to ponder is usually a hallmark of a great film, especially a great Sci-Fi film. Children of Men, 2001, Solaris, Blade Runner… They were all entertaining in their own way, but all of them had interesting things to say and left you thinking about things.

            Prometheus doesn’t do that.

            It thinks it’s doing that, tho. It brings up all kinds of things, but it doesn’t focus on anything. It just brings it up casually and then doesn’t expound upon it at all.

            “The engineers made us, and we made an android. Neat, huh?”
            “If the engineers made us, who made the engineers? So deep…”
            “What if Jesus was a space alien? Far out, man…”

            It just brings this stuff up and about a dozen other things, but it doesn’t really say anything ABOUT that stuff. It doesn’t have a reason to talk about it, it just brings it up and expects you to think it’s being all clever and shit. This is utterly unlike Those films I previously mentioned, which bring up one or two major themes or ideas and then explores those ideas. It’s the exploration of the ideas that leads to you thinking further about them after the movie is over. Comparing Prometheus to those movies is like comparing a stoned highschool kid to a group of philosophers and anthropologists.

            Further, You bring up the idea that Alien didn’t explain everything, which is true, but you don’t need any of that unexplained information to know what is going on in that movie. Dunno what the Space Jockey is or why it’s got alien eggs on it? Doesn’t matter. Don’t know where the aliens came from? Doesn’t matter. All you need to know is that there’s a creature loose on a ship and that it’s picking off the crew. The movie explains all of that very well because that’s what the movie is about. You always understand why the characters are doing things in Alien. Every scene is there for some reason.

            In Prometheus you almost never understand why the characters are doing the things they’re doing, and there are characters and entire scenes that serve no purpose at all in the film. Why is the exploding head scene in there? What do they get out of that scene? A neat scene where a head explodes. Why is the zombie guy there? They just kill him and nothing really comes of it. It’s just a pointless action scene. Why does the silicon storm thing happen? is it important that the storm happens? Not really. The only thing it does is keep the two guys in the place for a while. It doesn’t cut communications. It doesn’t damage the ship. It doesn’t even scratch their glass helmets.

            All of those scenes were in the original script, but ALL of those scenes had reasons to be there. The storm in the original script does indeed damage the ship and prevents them from leaving. The head doesn’t really explode in the original script, but they take it back to the ship and poke it with science and learn some important information that is used later in the film (hint: Their eyes are special in the original script…). The zombie guy isn’t a zombie but a weird proto-alien that is both a scary enemy but also a harbinger of the fact that there’s some kind of scary shit on this planet that isn’t an engineer.

            Basically, they took a halfway decent early draft and under Scott’s orders re-wrote it to remove a lot of the connections between the dots. They purposefully made it not make sense, because Scott felt that having a bunch of random shit happen would make his film mysterious and appear to have a lot of intriguing questions and stuff. It doesn’t. There are no answers in the movie because there are no answers to this stuff. What’s the green goo? There’s no fucking answer to that question. They put it in there because they knew people would go “OOOh, what’s that green goo about!? MYSTERIOUS!” They cut the entire first ten or fifteen minutes of the original draft because it explained too many things, like why are they going there, who are these people, what was that whole opening bit with the black goo stuff all about, etc. It made too much sense and they cut it out to make it feel more mysterious.

            And people are talking about this film as though it’s some masterpiece of sci-fi cinema. It’s not. It’s an awful way to make a movie. There’s a difference between trusting your audience to understand what you’re doing with a subtle film, and being cynical enough to expect that your audience will take all of your random mysterious bullshit and fill in their own gaps and call your film brilliant and clever for it.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

          Yip, as above… it seemed to begin with something unique and different and then just kinda dissolved into an ‘Aliens’ sequel. And yes, smart people acting stupidly also disappointing.

    • Metamorphis

      I think people have this the wrong way. I like how the article explained it, that the questions asked in Prometheus were not explored intelligently. I thought it would be the second coming of 2001 but it unfortunately wasn’t, which says a lot since Ridley Scott made Blade Runner, a film that asks very intelligent questions and explores them in very intelligent ways. Of course as you said not all movies are spoon-fed, watch a David Lynch movie and you will know. Everyone seems to be arguing over whether Prometheus revealed enough for the audience to feel satisfied. That’s not what went wrong! It didn’t explore the metaphysical themes well enough to feel satisfied.

      • Topper

        Exactly! And it only makes it more annoying when the people not exploring or acting intelligently are “scientists”! That’s what takes you out of the movie. These are suppose to be smart, intelligent people and they just… weren’t.

    • McMacBack

      questions are fine… as long as it’s organic to the story. Prometheus was garbage, that thought it was intelligent for asking questions that made no sense, and who’s context made less sense.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

      i think Prometheus was GOOD, but they had a chance to do something truly inspired with it, and instead they made an alien movie. Which, lets face it, has been done several times before.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

      i think Prometheus was GOOD, but they had a chance to do something truly inspired with it, and instead they made an alien movie. Which, lets face it, has been done several times before.

    • Andrew DeCriscio

      exactly ^^^^^^ and not the mention the movie was full of intellect and thinking….man the person who wrote that article doesnt have a brain cell between them and there asshole

  • Dana Wallon

    Amen on Prometheus. I saw Lindelof’s name in the credits at the start and thought; Oh, no.

    • JoseSD

      That name was so familiar, then I was watching a rerun of Lost on the G4 channel tonight and it said written by Damon Lindelof. Now I get why that movie was confusing and disappointing

    • bumboclot

      Yeah, maybe it’s best that Prometheus has no answers. If the writing is anything like Lost, those answers would be really lame!

  • http://twitter.com/Altavos Jarl Erik Cedergren

    Wut, Death Proof is an original and unique movie which makes no sense at all in the end! D: I liked it at least.

  • http://twitter.com/ReaperCorpse The Great One

    Deathproof was a great movie!!

    • obliv

      Death Proof mows my lawn and pays me a dollar an hour because it sucks and should be destroyed. If you can sit through those obnoxious idiotic girls, then your tolerance for dull boring brain dead idiots must be pretty high

    • Blunted Corleone

      I love Tarantino, every film that he’s done besides death proof is gold. When it comes to DP though i tried, i mean i really did, I sat there with a forced grin hoping that somewhere along the line i could justify the inane smile on my face. But after essentially two shit boring episodes of sex and city split up with a 5 minute car chase i was appalled, disgusted, sick, I felt as though i had been taken for a ride. I felt like at some point Tarantino just wanted to see if his fans were still committed to his movie making abilities or if his name had just become so mainstream that peoples would just nod and smile at any old shit stain. One day when i buy the entire Tarantino collection,(assuming that DP is in there) I’m going to take it out the box set, throw it in the fire, and replace the empty space with Natural born killers.

  • CSL

    The falling in a ditch story was to set up the fact that Zoe would be able to survive a fall, like later when she is thrown from the roof of the car. That was probably some of the most important dialogue in the film.

  • JoseSD

    In what way is Jason Bateman “likeable as always”? He plays the same character in every movie he’s in, I personally find him dull and obnoxious

    • eieio

      Amen!

    • CynicalErb

      He’s not the same in every movie. Have you seen Smokin’ Aces.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phil-McDonald/1611043811 Phil McDonald

    I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that you’re never more entertained than when someone is jangling their car keys for you. Any movie that has emotional content is a disappointment for not having enough funny fall down go boom.

    Hancock is not a comedy and comedy would ruin it (though not for you cause ooh look shiny). It’s my favorite “superhero” movie because it has depth and far more going on than just cool effects. The level of pain and resignation in Will Smith’s eyes is something I never saw him achieve before. It was a great film.

    • Daoofgeek

      Truly agree on Hancock, Phil; it’s on my list of films I can watch at any time. While I do like the comedy in it, there’s so much more heart. When he tells Bateman and Theron how horrible of a person he must have been to have no one visit him in the hospital and her reaction to it, that right there let’s you know it’s much more than just a vehicle for laughs.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

      here you go with the pain and suffering again guy…. weep, weep, weep

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phil-McDonald/1611043811 Phil McDonald

    I just re-read your opening paragraph. “Is there anything worse than being disappointed by a movie?” Oh I don’t know, your dog getting hit by a car when it’s pregnant with puppies? Being told you have terminal cancer, losing your job and becoming homeless? Or maybe even about a billion other things that can go wrong in your life that are more important than movies. Please tell me you don’t get paid to be writer.

    • Jack

      Jesus, what is your problem, buddy? This is a piece of pop culture writing, do you really think the writer was encompassing every aspect of life into that sentence? Just because he didn’t like your precious Hancock, which nobody liked anyway, you’ve gone insane. What loser wastes their time with comments like “Oh I don’t know your dog getting hit by a car”, as if there was ever any doubt about the fact. Get a life.

      • PsychoX

        Nobody is somebody.

      • rooster

        Your opinion isn’t everybodies. Nobody liked Hancock. Just cause some people didn’t like doesn’t mean everybody who saw it didn’t. Thats just bad english. Plus a stupid idea for a post. Goofball.

        • Jack Strawb

          I enjoyed the first half of Hancock. Only a boor wouldn’t.

          In any case, it’ll serve as the template for a well-made movie about a deranged superhero about five years from now. That makes it worth a little something.

      • GordoftheNorth

        By pop culture writing I take it your saying it’s excused for being thoughtlessly written. Okay well let’s treat it accordingly. What loser writes “get a life” when they are all worked up over someone else trying to write a thoughtful response to an article they’ve read on-line.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

          is that your actual opinion or did you just jump on someone else’s band wagon? go weep in the corner with the other guy.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

          is that your actual opinion or did you just jump on someone else’s band wagon? go weep in the corner with the other guy.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

          is that your actual opinion or did you just jump on someone else’s band wagon? go weep in the corner with the other guy.

        • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

          is that your actual opinion or did you just jump on someone else’s band wagon? go weep in the corner with the other guy.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Miss.Coco.Fortune Coco Fortune

      get a grip guy. go have a cry in a corner or something. put a wet blanket over your head and pretend the real world isn’t out there. just look into your inward darkness and weep.

  • PsychoX

    Really, you could just learn that things are what they are and let them stand on their own merits. They are what they are…and not trying to be anything else. Prometheus told an ok story…as did Death Proof (Stuntman Mike was great…yeah was…until he got owned by a bunch of girls and turned into a whiny baby.)…they did what they set out to do and nothing more or nothing less. Honestly if you can make something better…I’d like to see that.

  • PyschoX

    Where’s any of the Transformers films. All of those should be the only films on this list. Mindless piles of drivel, really bad comic relief, lots of explosions, no depth of character, featuring Shia LaBeouf and some giant robots.

  • masterhammet

    Silent hill would have been great if there were more scares and less confusing plot

  • imaginaryGHOST

    I disagree with a couple of things: Killing Them Softly is fantastic. I won’t go into spoilers, but if you liked Assassination of Jesse James… , you’ll love this.

    Prometheus was an ok movie, not great. But that has to do with the story, not a failure to ask the big question without providing an answer. Why do you need an answer? The implication is obvious – the Engineers tried to kill us because they could, or they saw us as a threat, or both. Why did humanity kill all homo-erectus and neanderthals? Why do we kill, period? Besides, the thought process of higher beings is most probably incomprehensible to us.I like that it asked us actual questions, too many films nowadays spoon-feed everything to audiences, and more than once, just to make sure that everyone got it (looking at you, Inception.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Harding/100000145858394 Mark Harding

    Here’s a complete opposite…..Rocky Balboa. Just about everybody groaned when word got out that Sly was going to make another Rocky film and thought he was out of his mind. Instead, what we got ended up being one of the best in the series. A very sentimental closer for a worn out franchise. Good one Sly!

    • tevra

      you don’t set the bar very high

  • http://twitter.com/InfectedByEli Munter

    And what about Terminator Salvation, one of the biggest let downs in history, to me anyway. I still hate you McG.

    • Jack Strawb

      Certainly much more of the ilk of Terminator 3 than the first two films. Look, I adore Moon Bloodgood, but when her acting is the high point of your film, your film is in deep and serious trouble.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paul.j.mason Paul J Mason

    “Mann’s decision to shoot in digital and HD is also ill-judged: the feeling of the 1930s is completely lost as a result.”

    I very much disagree.

    The “film” feeling of the 30′s is not there; however, the real feeling of the 30′s seems very apparent.

  • http://twitter.com/MinimeJer05 Jeremy Lebens

    I really enjoyed Death Proof and Jurassic Park II. While I can see the disappointment in Hancock and Prometheus at the same time I can’t see how one didn’t like Public Enemies!

    Killing Them Softly is a highly-anticipated film that I’ll be seeing next week, so no comment from me until then.

  • Benjo Colautti

    Wow, very impressed not only with your points and the way you designed this article, but each movie is all over the place in terms of genre. Kudos for including such titles as The Beach and Public enemies. Good job man

  • Jeff Rittenour

    WOW – the first one of these kinda lists that was DEAD ON ACCURATE. Wow. Great job. Every movie on here WAS a letdown and for mostly the reasons you stated. And BTW, people down below: you may have ENJOYED Prometheus – but it was NOT great. Far from it. Neither was Public Enemies AND Deathproof. People need to watch better movies, nowadays they can’t tell the difference between something they like and something that was of actual quality.

  • Rooster

    I don’t agree at all. I Thought all these movies except death proof, were absoluely great. Deathproof was crap but the rest entertained me as I wanted them to. Try not to be so picky about collabroative efforts. Hating on prometheus is too easy. I didn’t even know it was supposed to be crap till I got on zergnet. WTF?

  • Rick Blackwell

    It’s “FEW AND FAR BETWEEN”. How “few between” are these comic moments.

  • Ginsberg

    Buy a cheap pack of old exploitation films. Most of them ARE 90% cheap-to-film talk scenes with a few sex or action scenes for the trailer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jack-Prosser/1423450560 Jack Prosser

    All of these films are “great films” (apart from Hancock) maybe some were a little dissapointing but overall there all really good (oh ive not seen killing them.. yet, but ive heard good things)

  • hey

    public enemies is amazing, never got bored of it once

  • http://www.facebook.com/Tsun420 Daniel Wood

    loved Prometheus and i even liked the beach. Why on Earth should Hancock have been great? It’s a horrible idea since inception. Same as a remake of Public Enemies. Stupid list. You wanna know what movie should have been great? The Rum Dairy! based on the hunter s thompson book. Very Poor adaption that if treated a little more seriously instead of as a loose prequel to fear and loathing in las vegas, Would have been a great film. That’s just one example. Horrible list. No…just no… fucking hancock you kidding me?…

  • Ddl

    Dune. Perfect cast, perfect look. Script went stupid. Huge disappointment.

  • http://twitter.com/aRTCy Richard Terry Clark

    Great list!

  • Nakanaela

    I actually thought the gymnastic scene was the best and the T-rex in the city boooorrrring, one word Godzilla. Good movie though.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Laisa.echevarria Laisa Echevarria Colon

    i loved the lost world lol

  • Amanda

    I Am Legend should be on this list

    • bumboclot

      Yeah totally. Like Hancock, that one also falls apart half way through.

  • NCBrian

    i’m disappointed at the unbelievable number of slideshows that still permeate the internet.

  • http://twitter.com/sailorwannabe Charlotte Frances

    The most disappointing movie for me was “Hunger Games” because of the wolves. I even said long before the movie, that it would be awesome if they got the wolves right, well they got it soooooooooo wrong. It would have been great, if you could have seen the faces in the wolves of the fallen gamers.

  • GordoftheNorth

    I’ve only seen 3 of these and 2 of them I liked. Prometheus was a movie I go back to and get something ,ore out of with each viewing. I wasn’t in the buzz loop so it was something I stumbled across. I now see there was a lot of hype around it which probably put expectations into overdrive. I also liked Death Proof for what it was. A goofy Tarantino indulgence. Public Enemies was boring and there was no need for that given the subject matter.

  • obliv

    You are truly someone I must follow. I agree with this list (although if they are in descending order of badness, death proof should be higher… it sucked, and I love Tarantino). Excellent work. Great article. You’ve got a fan

  • Normandy Gray

    im glad im not the only person that though killin them softly was bad

  • Handyman003

    Why isn’t “The Phantom Menace” on this list??

  • Katie

    As soon as I saw the title of this list I immediately thought of Killing Them Softly. I was so ridiculously excited for that movie and then I went to see it opening day and was sad. Definitely agree with the heist scene though!

  • bumboclot

    I must agree with all of these. I actually liked Prometheus, but I really wanted to LOVE Prometheus.

    Hancock should have been great as well! The story was so dumb they really should have stuck with the comedic tone. Instead they went for some pathetic “serious” ending that totally didn’t fit in with that cartoonish CGI mess of a movie!

    And yes – Tarantino needs to cut down on his damn dialogue – finally someone said it! His movies are in danger of becoming more and more predictable. Lately, it seems every scene has a long conversation, followed by a burst of extreme violence, and repeat. At least mix up the rhythm once in a while, QT. You actually can tell a story visually once in a while!

  • Darren.

    Prometheus was a disappointment. Not because of the lack of ‘aliens’. Because it was garbage.

  • puddintain

    It’s ridiculous to assume that a gangster flick ( or any flick for that matter) must be shot on film. They didn’t have celluloid film back in the middle ages. does that mean that King Arthur should have been shot on iron film? Sure it’s a little weird seeing a costume drama in the sharp tones of video, but once you get passed that first minute of “hmm…that’s a bit odd” your good to go.

  • ChowYunPhat

    The problem with Death Proof is that Tarantino made an actual approximation of a true Grindhouse film and most people don’t seem to understand that those films were usually painfull dull & awful with only a few action scenes sprinkled within the run time. Planet Terror may be more fun (and more like an 80′s Golan-Globus film) but it’s not a real Grindhouse film.

  • Zippy

    Green Lantern should be on the list…. Along with Martix Reloaded & Revolutions…..
    Can’t believe these 2 were such a mess. Stupid marketing, horrible acting, crappy script…..

  • Iceman82

    Prometheus was imo one of the best movies of 2012…Possibly the 2000′s. I think it has been unfairly targeted. Ive watched it a few times…Im also a long time Alien & Predator fan. As someone whose seen all the movies multiple times, I really have no unanswered questions.

    I enjoyed Prometheus for what it was an amazing stand alone film in the Alien universe with little to no Alien connection. My biggest & most important question was…who were the engineers? I got my answer. what were their motives? doesn’t really matter.

    I believe though the movie was straight forward even in that aspect….we were marked for termination because we found out about the engineers. Who could see the face of God & learn his secrets & still expect to live? Great movie…im very happy to add to my collection. Was it perfect? no not at all….but then again Neither was Alien…Aliens being far superior.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Puckett/1286982050 Bill Puckett

    Public Enemies was a great movie, It handled the accurate historical events of Dillengers life on the lamb and ended the way Dillingers life did, just shot in the head on the sidewalk.

  • http://www.facebook.com/belyshev1 Konstantin Belyshev

    i dissagree with pretty much everything except the beach.

  • mybad

    The book ‘Public enemies’ is far more compleling than the film. The movie is too close to the dynamic of ‘Heat’ ‘brodding cop pursues brooding robber, when the real story was incompetent feds learn their trade as they pursue charismatic killer.

  • Movie Groaner

    Prometheus was pretty bad, granted it had to live up to the originals, but finding some wall art from people who were afraid of the sun and claiming it as irrefutable proof and spending billions of dollars in search of it with an idiot crew whose led by a woman (or possibly a man) who can only run in a straight line really makes the movie hard to watch as a movie. The significance of the black goo, how the engineers died, what they were doing and why, could all wait for a sequel of course. Everything else was pointless really unless they plan on having the head of that android go into a monologue of why Vickers hated her dad (who are now both dead so who cares) and the protagonist explains why it hurts to walk after a c-section, but not sprinting, jumping and rolling.

  • jj

    where is TDKR here

  • http://www.facebook.com/ahmeda.sure Ahmed NeverSleeps

    You know what movie really needs to bein this list? Lawless. That movie had so much potential; such fantastic actors and it’s shot so beautifully, but it ultimately falls flat with terrible pacing and a vague direction that leaves the viewer impressed but unsatisfied.

  • Reilie

    Jurassic Park 2 would have been great if it had been more about the dinosaurs than the human characters other species of dinosaurs had been introduced in addition to the Hadrosaur. Further, INGEN’s new director could have been developed into a more complex villain than. Last, all of the women in Dr. Malcolm’s life in the movie were annoyingly hard-headed and underdeveloped.

    Julianne Moore’s character was a complete idiot. Your boyfriend IS the man who was trapped on Isla Nublar during a systemic malfunction which caused alllllll of the dinosaurs to be able to escape their enclosures. He knows the dangers of being around them, including the those such as Gallamimus! If he tells you that it is too dangerous to conduct research at the place, then you should listen. He shouldn’t even have to tell you about the number of people that got eaten by carnivorous dinosaurs such T-Rex and Velociraptor. Just the fact that he was almost eaten should be enough for you to not go to Isla Nublar!

    The character of the adopted daughter was a little idiot, too. The character was also horribly underdeveloped. She sneaks onto his voyage to Jurassic Park, Isla Nublar. She knows the reason he wants her to stay behind, like Julianne Moore’s character, YET she goes anyway. That Velociraptor should have nipped her,lol. She, along with any other non-main character from the first film, was an annoying distraction from the Dinosaurs and Dr. Malcolm.

    Dr. Malcolm’s character was the exact opposite of how he was depicted in the first film. He was somewhat of a chauvinist in the first film, however he had more intrigue because you didn’t really know who he was or what he was about in the first half. He was beautifully revealed in the first movie. The second movie should have shown him as beginning the transition into a more evolved man. We should have seen the beginning of his relationship with Julianne Moore. As he dated other women, a development of admiration for Moore’s character would have been great. Then, towards the end of the film, he realizes how important she is to him.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001423497521 Spyda Ace Capone Jones

    who writes this shit!? Public enemies was a great, evening gangster movie. i wasnt expecting seeing people shooting up the place, but it had his great scenes.

  • radvile

    super, perfect, amazing movie! the best of all time!
    p.s.
    johnny is soooo hot in this on
    <3

  • puddintain

    I will grant that Public Enemies was a major snooze, but please stop dissing Mann’s choice of using HD video over celluloid. There’s nothing about “film:” that lends authenticity to a 1930s period piece. The invention of photography was about 1800 years after the time of “Spartacus” but that film somehow managed to have a sufficiently authentic feel.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ryan.mccafferty.370 Ryan McCafferty

    Godfather III? Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I? Looper? Bullitt?

  • eikapika

    i loved talking scenes but my boyfriend hated them

  • KillerPool

    I can’t believe The Dark Knight Rises is not on here. It was the most disappointing film ever in life and 2nd worst film of 2012 after Taken 2.

  • Nunya Business

    I liked Hancock but have to admit I agree with the gripes, I don’t think it ruins the movie but it also keeps it from being great. We didn’t need to know his back story and Therone didn’t need to be a superhero too, I would have liked it more if it left his past ambiguous and had went for more funny than tragic (though to say it’s the saddest movie Will Smith’s ever been it is way off base, ever seen the Pursuit of Happiness? Seven Pounds? I Am Legend?). I would have like Therone to be less important, I didn’t like a single thing she did after the restaurant scene. But all that being said I think it’s not bad, just could have been better.

    • Squiggly_P

      In the original script, Smith’s character was much more of an asshole, Therone’s character had no powers and the two ended up having an affair. There was a reason he lived out in the desert, and Smith’s character tried to become a better person but ended up probably more of a dick by the end than the beginning. It was more about the salesman guy, who ended up taking a security guard job or something and stopping some crime on his own and having his own redemption. It was more about heroes and how often times the people who get called heroes are actually assholes, and how there are a lot of people who try their hardest stand up for what’s right and get attacked for doing so.

      Then they took that interesting, somewhat somber script (It wasn’t all that well written, but it was a good concept for a movie and had solid themes going on) that was a clever take on the whole superhero thing and rewrote it into a goofy action comedy that ended up being just like the cliche comic book movies it was originally trying to make a point about.

  • William

    The most disappointing movie ever imo was Martyrs. I was watching heaps of YouTube videos of the scariest movies of all time, and Martyrs was always in the list, and if it wasn’t there were several comments saying it should be. I was then talking to people online about it on chat sites and they all said it was so scary. So I decided to watch it and got so bored, the story was terrible, acting was alright, not the greatest, but I seriously don’t see how people got scared from that film.
    Another movie that really disappointed me was Paranormal Activity 4. I loved the 1st three, they kept getting better and better, and then the forth went completely downhill. The story made no sence, it was only scary in the last 20 minutes and the ending was terrible

  • Lambda Punk

    oh man I laughed till I stopped.
    just get rid of the boring political undercurrent?
    sure why not. or better still why not just rewatch all your favourite Scorcesse flicks and marvel at how actually political they all are as well. Taxi Driver anyone?

  • tevra

    Everyone I know loved Jurassic Park and everyone would have cheered with me if it was Goldblum instead of the lawyer that had gotten eaten by the dino.

    in what dreamworld did you imagine that Jeff Goldblum was the most beloved of the original cast…. he was barely a supporting character and for sure was not necessary to the story……

  • Dave M

    I was just thinking of this movie the other day: ‘Rumor Has it’. The Jennifer Aniston movie where she suspects that her family may have been the basis for the book and movie ‘The Graduate’. With the cast they had and Rob Reiner at the helm-and the incredible concept-this should have been one of the greatest movies ever.

  • zaz_cag

    I’m tired of hearing people saying they hated Death Proof, because of all of the talking. Quentin loves dialogue, and he’s giving us something that a lot of other writers have fallen short of, or don’t care about, giving us.

    • http://www.facebook.com/anthony.d.stokes.3 Anthony Donovan Stokes

      Yeah, but the dialogue was terrible

  • Arysta Henry

    Why isn’t “Eragon” mentioned? that movie was seriously wrong and disappointing. Talk about trash. Do us a favor…Make another that follows the books.

  • Portmanteau

    Couldn’t agree more with regards to Hancock….completely fails to realise the potential of its premise

  • jawsfan2008

    Great list all around. I would throw in the American Godzilla. Waited years for a big budget American Godzilla flick. WhatI got was a film that was so bad that I thought it destroyed all hope that toho would ever let us have another shot at the Big G. Thank goodness I was wrong. But boy it was bad.

  • cms8924

    Nine. All those expectations…

  • elguapo

    Death proof is in my top ten worst movies list. Torture is the only word to describe listening to those girls talk. A total shame because planet terror was great fun.

  • Hidrocarburo

    Where is Superman Returns??

  • Hidrocarburo

    Where is Superman Returns??

  • Cervantes

    Come on… Those who didn’t understand Prometheus hate it or don’t like it… If you undrestood just in the slightest you actually like the film! And there’s no plot holes! AND there’s answers for most of questions right there in the film itself! And the rest you can imagine if you think a bit.
    By the way, it’s Lindelof, no Lindleof. Be sure to spell correctly and use the language properly. Damon is one of the best writers ever. Period.

  • Cervantes

    I agree with everything else, though. I’m glad I’m not the only one that sees the flaws of those movies (except Prometheus… Film that is misunderstood, as many good works that are too complex for average minds).
    Best regards.

  • Kenneth Serenyi

    Why limit this list to just 7? It would be really easy to come up with at least 3 more… ;)