Fall Movie Preview Spectacular! Part 3

Screen Shot 2012 08 31 at 1.35.44 PM 670x334 Fall Movie Preview Spectacular! Part 3 The Films of November

Having wrapped up our Summer 2012 film coverage with the End of Summer Movie Awards a few days ago, it is time to look forward to Fall and the rest of what 2012 has in store. This has been an extremely enjoyable year for cinema so far, but when one looks at the absolute mountain of titles the industry has coming over the next few months, one has to imagine studios have been saving the best for last.

There are so many films coming out through the end of the year, in fact, that we thought it would be a good idea to put together this handy, four-part guide to the films of the Fall. This preview, publishing throughout the week, is divided into four parts, each exploring one remaining month of the year.

Part 1 explored the cinema of September, Part 2 examined October, and today, in Part 3, we’re looking at the films of November, with a guide to release dates, casts, story information, trailers, and my analysis of how each individual movie may stack up.

It’s our Fall Movie Preview Spectacular! Part 3, enjoy!

Begin reading on the next page…

obloodyhell

}}} about America’s greatest President

Many would take issue with that. While certainly a great man, he did defacto destroy States Rights, which were a singularly important part of the foundation of this nation and its controls over the Federal government. We’ve been working for the last 50 years to restore some semblance of that control, and mostly losing ground. That States Rights were seriously flawed in terms of the notion that they were not constrained by the Consitution, they were still valid at their heart. I don’t believe Spielberg will touch on those things at all, and that will be a strong weakness to this film.
obloodyhell

The truly wretched part about Twilight is that it, along with “True Blood” is an exercise in “Vampire Chic”, the notion that Vampires, which are explicitly evil, have no emotions other than the blood lust (much less a desire for, or interest in, “sex”), and pretty much cannot, as Vampires, be “good guys”. This started, within reason, with Joss Whedon’s Angel (though you could argue it started with Anne Rice), but Angel wasn’t a vampire in the strictest sense. His soul was returned to him by a curse, and that tormented him all the time, he now SAW the evil he’d done, and felt the pain and suffering of all those he’d tormented. He wasn’t a true vampire any more. The same cannot be said for those in True Blood or Twilight (or even Underworld). They aren’t going to be compassionate or understanding or loving or caring. That’s not what a “vampire” is.
Tangibulla

Crappy click-bait website, and second-rate, self-indulgent reviews. Get a job!