Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

Part One: A Storm Is Coming

The Structure of The Dark Knight Rises 

 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

I find it highly amusing that, after spending two films working hard to cement his Batman story in a real-world context, Christopher Nolan employs a full-on comic-book structure for The Dark Knight Rises.

The entire story is paced like the world’s darkest comics run, with several ‘issues’ (the first act) establishing each character and how they fit into the new status quo, developing these characters over a series of episodic but highly interrelated incidents (Gordon going down to the sewers, Bruce investigating Selina Kyle, Batman chasing Bane’s men after the heist, etc.) until a massive, show-stopping ‘turning point’ changes the direction of the story (Bane breaks the Bat). Development continues as the villain gradually unleashes his plan, while the hero waits in the wings recuperating, all leading up to one grand, extended climax segmented into multiple phases (Batman frees the cops, Batman takes on Bane, Batman flies to stop the nuclear device, etc.).

One can imagine each phase of the film’s story as an isolated comic issue, and I found that episodic, serialized pace absolutely invigorating. It’s extremely different than what Nolan has done before, but it suits the nature of this particular story. The Dark Knight barreled along with relentless flow and intensity, barely stopping to catch its breath, a chaotic pace reflective of its lunatic, anarchic villain.

But Bane is very, very different than the Joker. He’s not terrorizing Gotham for pleasure, or even to prove a point. He is out to destroy with a clear, concrete plan, and the film’s structure is reflective of this. It’s rigid; it’s segmented; it has steps, laying the groundwork in piecemeal fashion and growing larger and more frantic as it moves along. And in its own way, I think this form of organized chaos is just as terrifying as the Joker’s machinations in the second film.

But a serialized structure isn’t the only element Nolan borrows from the comics this time around. In many ways, he veers closer to popular Batman mythos here than in the other films, bringing back the Batcave, giving the Dark Knight more hi-tech toys to play with, and inhabiting the film’s universe with more ‘larger-than-life’ characters than ever before.

Take Bane. There are, of course, differences between Tom Hardy’s Bane and the character’s typical comics depiction – Bane’s mask staves off pain in the film, where it usually provides him with the powerful Venom serum in the comics – but he’s still a giant, hulking monstrosity with a strange, fearsome device covering his face. It’s a terrifying, heightened image, one born from the amplified world of comics.

tomhardy The Dark Knight Rises 1922532 512x360 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

Yet it’s Bane’s voice that creates the dramatic contrast. To hear that voice – jovial, proper, dignified, eloquent – coming out of that monstrous image, with an extra, mangled dimension to it…unsettling doesn’t even begin to describe it. What Hardy does with the role – and I’m among those who firmly believe the man deserves an Oscar nomination for his incredibly committed performance – plays off the unique visual and sonic elements of the cinematic medium, but it is, again, rooted in comic-book concepts. Hardy’s Bane is the equivalent of a comic character who is illustrated one way, but has a particular lettering and speech style that suggests something else. This is done to imply a focused auditory element to the reader, but in film, there’s no need to merely ‘suggest.’ You can bring it all to life, voice and image, and this is what Hardy and Nolan have accomplished with the character.

They have also borrowed liberally from Bane’s most iconic comic-book arc, Knightfall, a narrative choice that pleased me to no end. It’s by no means a literal adaptation of that story, but the general structure of Bane and Batman’s conflict is strikingly similar. In their first fight, Bane completely destroys Batman, and Nolan even recreates the legendary panel where Bane “breaks the Bat” (which is as brutal a moment as I’ve ever seen in a Hollywood blockbuster). Bruce’s imprisonment is unique to The Dark Knight Rises, but as in Knightfall, Bruce uses the time he spends healing to study his enemy, learning the function of Bane’s mask and, therefore, his weakness. In the final fight, Batman then defeats Bane by disconnecting the tubes on his mask, throwing Bane into agonizing pain (in Knightfall, this robs Bane of his Venom and his power, but the general concept is still the same).

The biggest difference between this Bane and most popular comic interpretations is his connection to the League of Shadows and Talia al Ghul. It’s a change that makes perfect sense in context of the larger trilogy – Nolan’s story would feel incomplete if the League didn’t return in this final chapter – and by including Talia, Nolan doesn’t stray as far from Batman mythology as it initially seems.

Personally, the reveal of Miranda Tate’s true identity does not come as much of a surprise. Anyone can probably tell there’s more to Miranda than meets to eye, if only because one doesn’t hire someone as spectacularly talented as Marion Cotillard for a bit part. For those even partially versed in Batman lore, though, mentions of Ra’s al Ghul, the League of Shadows, and a mysterious offspring indicate Talia is hidden in plain sight, and it’s a good bet she’s the woman Bruce Wayne is bedding.

I’m extremely satisfied with the film’s take on Talia, even if I feel more could have been done in the first act to establish why Bruce is smitten with this woman. I think some will be troubled that the reveal comes so late in the film, but that’s part of who Talia is. The truth about her identity has to hurt Bruce, and it has to hurt the audience as well. The revelation has to occur in the most crucial of moments, or its impact is lessened; as portrayed here, there’s a real, painful weight to the truth about Talia, one that adds to the already considerable emotional push of the last act. Cotillard’s Talia is a much more morally compromised character than the comic incarnations I’m most familiar with, but like most Batman characters, Talia is a highly malleable creation, and since Nolan nails many of the little details, I’m okay with him altering other specifics to suit the film’s thematic needs.

Those little referential touches – as well as nods here and there to Frank Miller’s Dark Knight Returns – got the fanboy in me pumped, but nothing in this film excited me nearly as much as Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman. Yes, she is only ever referred to as Selina Kyle in the film’s diegesis, but this is Catwoman through and through, and I felt positively giddy watching this character brought to life so flawlessly.

 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

There is, of course, no singular interpretation of Catwoman in the comics, but the Selina that Nolan and Hathaway have brought to life here is the one I’m most familiar with. Her playful, sensual attitude; her precise, acrobatic fighting style; her frisky back-and-forth banter with Bruce and Batman, and the near telepathic connection they share in battle. Everything I connect with Catwoman is there, and Hathaway is just mesmerizing in the part, embodying the character in mind, body, and soul.

The amount she suggests through unscripted material – glances, movements, inflections, etc. – speaks volumes about the character’s psyche and motivations. We’ll dive deeper into how Selina functions on a thematic level later on, but Hathaway is simply brilliant at illustrating the fundamental truth behind this character: That she’s a frustrated woman in a brutal man’s world, a cunning strategist who manipulates the ‘male gaze’ to get ahead, subverting typical male ideas about feminine sexuality and outward appearance to find a semblance of balance in a grossly imbalanced social hierarchy.

But again, we’ll talk more about Selina later. For now, it’s just important to reiterate how much fun Hathaway is to watch in the part, what amazing chemistry she shares with Christian Bale, and how surprising it is to see Nolan veer this close to the comics.

Bane and Catwoman both, to my mind, exist outside the strictly ‘realistic’ boundaries Nolan set for himself in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. I don’t believe those films ever strived for the same level of realism as, say, The Wire, but they did work hard to establish a palpable, relatable context with which to view this world; with larger-than-life characters, a more overtly comic-book structure, and a vastly heightened scale (Gotham becomes a full-fledged war-zone), The Dark Knight Rises is all about blowing that context to hell. The horror Bane rains down upon Gotham is frightening to watch because it happens to a world we view as startlingly close to our own, and therefore, Nolan is able to discuss his themes on a scale that is both shockingly epic and profoundly intimate.

We shall first examine the intimate side of these themes by discussing the completion of Bruce Wayne’s journey, before continuing to take a look at how The Dark Knight Rises operates in a larger sociopolitical context.

Read ‘Part Two: More Than Just A Man’ by continuing onto the next page…

PreviousNext
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Atomic Ross

    This is terrible. A painfully long, over-written jerkoff that offers no critical insight.

    And I liked the movie.

    • Anonymous

      I liked the part where he quoted himself and recommended that you read his other article.

    • Tracer Bullet

      Was just about to write pretty much the exact same comment…… The writer seems obsessed with using long, fanciful words that add nothing to the article which in itself isn’t up to much anyway.

  • serenityncc880

    I loved this article. So insightful and passionate. First worthy article I have seen for such a great film and Trilogy. I will be saving this on my computer. Thank you!!

  • Geoffrey Shauger

    Loved the movie…it’s my favorite of the 3 and is 2nd only to Inception on Nolan’s resume.

  • rks

    Did you like the movie though? I couldn’t tell from reading the article.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      I loved the movie. I think it’s an excellent conclusion to the franchise, and an impressive cinematic milestone.

  • http://twitter.com/maliu808 Maliu

    Thank you for this piece. Ever since seeing the movie, and blown away by the breadth of skill throughout, I couldn’t organize my thoughts. Much like you I loved it but am enamored with the Dark Knight. I do, however, think that this is one of the best ending to an intense & moving trilogy. And I can’t wait for the boxed set so that I can marathon the trilogy.

  • James Matlock

    Excellent article, very thoughtful and insightful and I agree with it 100%. The best review of this film!

  • Jon Buch

    Thank you for some great articles on the Batman triology. I’ve got a question for you. Which other films throughout history do you consider as epics? And how come you don’t consider TDK an epic

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      Obvious examples include “Lawrence of Arabia,” “Ben Hur,” “Seven Samurai,” and “2001: A Space Oddyssey.” Those are the ones that come immediately to mind. I think “Lord of the Rings” is clearly an epic as well.

      TDK is a great movie, one of the best ever made in my opinion, and better than TDKR. Not being an epic isn’t a bad thing. It just means its goals are different than that of an epic. TDK, compared to epics like TDKR, simply has a smaller scope. The Joker’s goal, for instance, is not full-scale annihilation so much as chaos and terror. There are also fewer characters, and the film is more focused on a singular narrative than multiple converging plot threads. This, to me, is what makes it a great movie. It means it’s not an epic, but again, that’s in no way a bad thing.

  • Alejandro Roggio

    My main gripe with the film was that it contradicts everything established by the last films. It completely reverses the impact that Joker had on Gotham while at the same time “fixing” Bruce Wayne and ridding him of his psychological trauma. In essence, it cheapens the significant of everything that happened in the first films. The film is fine as a stand-alone flick, but it fails as a continuation (and as a finale) to this theatrical saga.

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good!

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good

  • lifelong-batfan

    To your discussion of this film (and the other two in the trilogy) as an “epic,” I would add a definition often used by English majors like myself: that is, a narration of a particular culture or society’s core values and beliefs, typically in a mythical or larger-than-life fashion, and grounded in events and circumstances that are/were especially meaningful to that group of people at that time.

    While it could be argued that this applies to many different comic book characters, I think it applies most of all to Bruce Wayne/Batman. He is “one of us”; an ordinary American who strives to become more than he is; an innovator, an individual who stubbornly, even self-destructively refuses to acknowledge “the way things are”; an individual who believes absolutely in the power of the individual.

    Brilliant article, and the first I’ve seen that really engages with the film on its own very complicated level.

  • Zee Remorca

    “we can stick to what our hearts tell us and rise above our worst instincts at the same time, and that in so doing, we may truly empower and improve the world around us.”

    this alone makes reading the article worth it.

    Congratulations, Jonathan. You’ve made me a fan. I look forward to reading more of your work :D

  • Hooty

    What a great movie! I don’t think the cat woman character served much of a purpose, but that’s just my thoughts. Like with The Dark Knight, I will be buying this dvd when it’s released and watch it over and over. Good job!

  • Kovaks

    Thanx for such a great read.

  • MariHh97

    THANKS FOR THE ARTICLE! Excellent! LOVE IT

  • John

    Jonathan Lack, and others, who understand the true impact of experiencing a movie like TDKR in a 15/70 mm perf auditorium, and know it is COMPLETELY different from seeing the movie in an auditorium that has been retrofitted to be an “IMAX” theater, need educate moviegoers about the difference more fully.

    I saw TDKR is the IMAX at Lowes Metreon in San Francisco. That screen is 100′ x 85′. The scenes utilizing 15/70mm are AMAZING. Retrofitted IMAX auditoriums using the digital projectors are on screens that are 58′ x 28′, and the clarity of image Lack refers to is nowhere close to what is projected by those 15/70 projectors that IMAX is even removing from some of their auditoriums.

    I hope that I will be able to see TDKR presented in the medium again. Hopefully it will be represented by Blu-ray/DVD in at least some way. They can at least fill our HDTV screens with what is filmed by the IMAX cameras.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joshualepselter Pennybags Lepselter

    When you were discussing the far away prison, you state that fear was the ultimate motivation for Batman, yet when you bring Selina Kyle into the mix, you state that anger is their collective motivation, not fear. Why the change?

    Fantastic article by the way. I was not expecting the entire film to be picked apart so beautifully and masterfully, all the way down to the score. It was worth reading all 10,000 words and more. Please keep this lost talent of writing going for all of us to enjoy for future epics. Thank you.

  • MichaeltheArchangel

    That movie sucked on all accounts. The only people that like this movie are stupid people.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=599459594 Michael Little

      Go jerk off to that goddamn stupid Avengers movie. That movie was dumber than an NFL linebacker. Terrible filmmaking.

  • craig

    Dude, I don’t think Nolan gives a shit about “Occupy Wallstreet”

  • Benjamin

    While the movie has many good points, I thought the script and dialogue had many deficiencies. Every line Alfred spoke, for instance, had my toes curling, even if Michael Caine did his best to salvage them. I also found Bale exceedingly poor in the central role – little charisma and an absolutely ridiculously overdone voice as Batman. Hardy was good, but the plot and the themes juvenile at best.

  • Benjamin

    Furthermore, and perhaps crucially, the scenes between Talia/Tate and Bruce/Batman do not really come off in my oppinion. There is little chemistry between the actors and the characters have little reason for being together. It just felt tagged on and out of place.