Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

But Bruce still has his Batman persona to turn to, and with Alfred gone, he retreats behind the cowl even further than before, embarking on a truly reckless mission to find Bane. Given what Bruce knows about his enemy, and what relatively little time he’s spent training his body for the confrontation, it’s Bruce’s arrogance, as much as Bane’s ruthlessness, that leads to Bane breaking the Bat.

Yet in the film’s darkest bit of irony, it’s Bane’s brutality that, in the long run, leads to Bruce’s salvation. By breaking his body, Bane robs Bruce of Batman, the last escape he could cling to, and in the horrible pit of a jail Bane leaves him in, Bruce has nothing to rely on but himself. Not Batman; not Alfred; not even Gordon. He is truly, utterly alone, with nothing to focus on but his own fractured spirit, symbolized by a broken body. He must strengthen, heal, and come to a deeper understanding of both body and mind if he is to rise from this darkness and return triumphant.

Rise he does, and return he does, stronger, healthier, and most importantly, whole, perhaps for the first time since his parents’ murder. It is in that pit that Bruce synthesizes the many warring aspects of his personality into one strong, unified identity. His struggle is symbolized by the deadly climbing challenge, but this is merely metaphor for the deeper issues at play.

Consider the three different emotions Bruce utilizes on his separate attempts at climbing out of the pit. First is desperation. The anxiety that comes with watching Gotham fall to pieces makes Bruce act with haste. While desperation may be powerful as a momentary inspiration, it can never provide the lasting catharsis Bruce needs to overcome his emotional issues. Thus, he fails, and sheds desperation from his mind by breaking the TV Bane has provided him, coming one step closer to finding the inner calm required to achieve his task.

Next is anger. Bruce channels his rage – towards Bane, towards himself, towards the situation – into his mission, but it is not powerful enough either. Anger holds us down, clouds our vision, and makes us do horrible things. It was anger that nearly destroyed Bruce’s future in Batman Begins, when rage compelled him to consider killing Joe Chill, the thug that murdered his parents. Bruce had to shed his anger then to become better, and he has to shed it now. Anger will not allow him to rise.

No, what propels Bruce out of the cell is fear, the very first theme introduced in Nolan’s trilogy. Bruce once used fear as fuel; it was the very inspiration behind Batman. But over the course of his journey, Bruce lost hold of his greatest fear, and that fear, in turn, took hold of him.

What is that fear? This is one of the great interpretive questions of the trilogy, one where each viewer may draw separate conclusions. I personally believe Bruce’s truest terror is the concept of failure, the possibility that he may be unable to help those he cares for. This fear was born at the moment of his parents’ murder, a situation in which he was helpless. Tracing Bruce’s story, it is clear that so much of his drive comes from a subconscious desire to purge basic human inabilities, to become extraordinary so that tragic failures, like the loss of his parents, will never befall him again. Bats and darkness are merely symbols; what Bruce truly fears is the powerless emotions they embody.

Batman was born out of a need to turn that fear into power, to prove to himself and the people of Gotham that helplessness was not something to give in to, but to rise above. And for a while, Batman did just that, for Bruce and for Gotham. But the events of The Dark Knight were a turning point, as Bruce encountered obstacles even Batman could not overcome. He could not protect innocent lives from the wrath of the Joker; he could not save Harvey Dent, Gotham’s ‘white knight,’ from turning towards darkness; he couldn’t even save Rachel, the person who mattered most to him, from her deadly fate.

These are the experiences that simmered in Bruce’s heart over the eight-year gap leading to The Dark Knight Rises. Living with this guilt, day after day, robbed Bruce of his faith in himself, and in Batman. The fear returned, not as power, but as a crippling, blinding inability to see the light.

It’s only when Bruce realizes this – the role his own fear plays in his life – that he is able to make the climb. A humbled Bruce, stripped of auspices and illusions, once again accepts his fears into his heart, learning this time to live with them not as someone superhuman, but as Bruce Wayne, nothing more than a man.

This is how his soul heals, and this is how he is able to rebuild his identity from the ground-up, first as Bruce Wayne, then as Batman, then as symbol to Gotham. Each identity must be synthesized, powerful collectively rather than individually, for Bruce to rise above the darkness. Rise he does, out of the pit and back to Gotham, where Batman saves the city, rehabilitates his image, and inspires the people out of their apathy.

I now return to my starting point: That to cement Batman’s symbolic power, Bruce Wayne must die. As I said before, I failed to factor the thematic role of redemption into my speculative analysis, and this is why I got the particulars wrong. But death is still part of Nolan’s endgame, and though Bruce ultimately fakes his own demise, the effect I spoke of earlier is still the same.

The people of Gotham see Batman die for them, and those who knew the Dark Knight’s identity mourn for him as Bruce Wayne. But Batman’s actions are not forgotten, and he does indeed become the symbol of hope, unity, and progress Bruce intended him to be. Gotham erects a statue in Batman’s honor, and the Bat-signal is resorted to GCPD headquarters.

But the clearest example of Batman’s legacy is character-based, woven into the very fabric of The Dark Knight Rises through Officer John Blake and the at-risk boys’ home he protects. Blake is an essential character, for he represents what Batman’s actions have meant to a younger generation. As a boy, Blake would have grown up without the healing power of hope were it not for Batman’s presence, and he follows in the Dark Knight’s footsteps in more ways than one over the course of the film. Meanwhile, the boys at the shelter Blake himself comes from also believe in Batman, even though they are barely old enough to remember him. This shows that, even in Batman’s absence, his effect is felt by younger generations, those who will, in due time, come to inherit Gotham.

 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

It is brilliant, then, that Nolan ends his trilogy by allowing Blake, one of these younger people inspired by Batman, to literally ascend as Batman’s successor. It proves that Batman’s legacy will never be forgotten; the torch shall be carried literally by Blake, and figuratively by the people of Gotham who owe their lives to the Dark Knight. Batman has become something bigger than Bruce Wayne, and Gotham will be better for it.

The concept isn’t just given a cursory glance at the end of the film, either. One of The Dark Knight Rises greatest strengths, from start to finish, is how well the John Blake character is developed. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is beyond fantastic in the role, utterly compelling in every single scene, and Blake only becomes more interesting as his eyes are steadily opened to the same truths that once inspired Bruce Wayne to don the cowl. There’s also something amusing about the character’s inclusion and significance, considering how strongly Nolan once opposed the idea of Robin. Comic fans know that, when done right, Robin is a crucial part of the Batman mythos for these exact reasons, and it’s nice to see Nolan recognize this, even if Blake is more an homage to Robin than an outright adaptation.

In any case, we must end this section of our discussion by examining Bruce’s choice to fake his own death. Having symbolically risen and been accepted by Gotham once more, Bruce could easily continue his role as Batman; there is no immediate need for his departure.

It once again comes down to viewer interpretation, but consider what I wrote above about Bruce’s need to heal himself, first and foremost, before he can tend to the needs of a community. Given the experiences Bruce had over the course of this trilogy, he knows that, if he goes back to being Batman, the pattern will repeat itself. Batman will do well for a while, but things will get tough, and as a man, he will be unable to endure. As Harvey Dent once said, “you either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”

In a sense, Bruce and Batman both died as heroes, and they will be remembered as such. Batman’s legacy is safe. The symbol will continue to do good for Gotham, especially in John Blake’s hands. Batman is bigger than Bruce Wayne now, and as such, Bruce has the ability to do what he once promised Rachel: To leave Batman behind and simply live his life.

It is a promise he must keep, not just to her, but to Alfred. As Batman said at the end of The Dark Knight:  “People deserve to have their faith rewarded.” And by simply getting on with life – alongside Selina Kyle, another lost soul in need of a fresh start – Bruce fulfills these promises, and maintains three films’ worth of significant character growth. It may be a radical departure from our typical concept of who Batman is, but to my mind, if Bruce didn’t leave Batman behind at the end of the film, a trilogy of development would have been for naught.

And, of course, to move on in the context of Alfred’s dream – to run into Bruce on vacation, happy and content with a family of his own – is as emotionally fulfilling a conclusion as any story could possibly ask for. Alfred is, as I said, the series’ most profound human touchstone. And after a long, arduous journey, Bruce Wayne has finally joined him. He is whole.

Read ‘Part Three: Born In Darkness’ by continuing onto the next page…

PreviousNext
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Atomic Ross

    This is terrible. A painfully long, over-written jerkoff that offers no critical insight.

    And I liked the movie.

    • Anonymous

      I liked the part where he quoted himself and recommended that you read his other article.

    • Tracer Bullet

      Was just about to write pretty much the exact same comment…… The writer seems obsessed with using long, fanciful words that add nothing to the article which in itself isn’t up to much anyway.

  • serenityncc880

    I loved this article. So insightful and passionate. First worthy article I have seen for such a great film and Trilogy. I will be saving this on my computer. Thank you!!

  • Geoffrey Shauger

    Loved the movie…it’s my favorite of the 3 and is 2nd only to Inception on Nolan’s resume.

  • rks

    Did you like the movie though? I couldn’t tell from reading the article.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      I loved the movie. I think it’s an excellent conclusion to the franchise, and an impressive cinematic milestone.

  • http://twitter.com/maliu808 Maliu

    Thank you for this piece. Ever since seeing the movie, and blown away by the breadth of skill throughout, I couldn’t organize my thoughts. Much like you I loved it but am enamored with the Dark Knight. I do, however, think that this is one of the best ending to an intense & moving trilogy. And I can’t wait for the boxed set so that I can marathon the trilogy.

  • James Matlock

    Excellent article, very thoughtful and insightful and I agree with it 100%. The best review of this film!

  • Jon Buch

    Thank you for some great articles on the Batman triology. I’ve got a question for you. Which other films throughout history do you consider as epics? And how come you don’t consider TDK an epic

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      Obvious examples include “Lawrence of Arabia,” “Ben Hur,” “Seven Samurai,” and “2001: A Space Oddyssey.” Those are the ones that come immediately to mind. I think “Lord of the Rings” is clearly an epic as well.

      TDK is a great movie, one of the best ever made in my opinion, and better than TDKR. Not being an epic isn’t a bad thing. It just means its goals are different than that of an epic. TDK, compared to epics like TDKR, simply has a smaller scope. The Joker’s goal, for instance, is not full-scale annihilation so much as chaos and terror. There are also fewer characters, and the film is more focused on a singular narrative than multiple converging plot threads. This, to me, is what makes it a great movie. It means it’s not an epic, but again, that’s in no way a bad thing.

  • Alejandro Roggio

    My main gripe with the film was that it contradicts everything established by the last films. It completely reverses the impact that Joker had on Gotham while at the same time “fixing” Bruce Wayne and ridding him of his psychological trauma. In essence, it cheapens the significant of everything that happened in the first films. The film is fine as a stand-alone flick, but it fails as a continuation (and as a finale) to this theatrical saga.

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good!

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good

  • lifelong-batfan

    To your discussion of this film (and the other two in the trilogy) as an “epic,” I would add a definition often used by English majors like myself: that is, a narration of a particular culture or society’s core values and beliefs, typically in a mythical or larger-than-life fashion, and grounded in events and circumstances that are/were especially meaningful to that group of people at that time.

    While it could be argued that this applies to many different comic book characters, I think it applies most of all to Bruce Wayne/Batman. He is “one of us”; an ordinary American who strives to become more than he is; an innovator, an individual who stubbornly, even self-destructively refuses to acknowledge “the way things are”; an individual who believes absolutely in the power of the individual.

    Brilliant article, and the first I’ve seen that really engages with the film on its own very complicated level.

  • Zee Remorca

    “we can stick to what our hearts tell us and rise above our worst instincts at the same time, and that in so doing, we may truly empower and improve the world around us.”

    this alone makes reading the article worth it.

    Congratulations, Jonathan. You’ve made me a fan. I look forward to reading more of your work :D

  • Hooty

    What a great movie! I don’t think the cat woman character served much of a purpose, but that’s just my thoughts. Like with The Dark Knight, I will be buying this dvd when it’s released and watch it over and over. Good job!

  • Kovaks

    Thanx for such a great read.

  • MariHh97

    THANKS FOR THE ARTICLE! Excellent! LOVE IT

  • John

    Jonathan Lack, and others, who understand the true impact of experiencing a movie like TDKR in a 15/70 mm perf auditorium, and know it is COMPLETELY different from seeing the movie in an auditorium that has been retrofitted to be an “IMAX” theater, need educate moviegoers about the difference more fully.

    I saw TDKR is the IMAX at Lowes Metreon in San Francisco. That screen is 100′ x 85′. The scenes utilizing 15/70mm are AMAZING. Retrofitted IMAX auditoriums using the digital projectors are on screens that are 58′ x 28′, and the clarity of image Lack refers to is nowhere close to what is projected by those 15/70 projectors that IMAX is even removing from some of their auditoriums.

    I hope that I will be able to see TDKR presented in the medium again. Hopefully it will be represented by Blu-ray/DVD in at least some way. They can at least fill our HDTV screens with what is filmed by the IMAX cameras.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joshualepselter Pennybags Lepselter

    When you were discussing the far away prison, you state that fear was the ultimate motivation for Batman, yet when you bring Selina Kyle into the mix, you state that anger is their collective motivation, not fear. Why the change?

    Fantastic article by the way. I was not expecting the entire film to be picked apart so beautifully and masterfully, all the way down to the score. It was worth reading all 10,000 words and more. Please keep this lost talent of writing going for all of us to enjoy for future epics. Thank you.

  • MichaeltheArchangel

    That movie sucked on all accounts. The only people that like this movie are stupid people.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=599459594 Michael Little

      Go jerk off to that goddamn stupid Avengers movie. That movie was dumber than an NFL linebacker. Terrible filmmaking.

  • craig

    Dude, I don’t think Nolan gives a shit about “Occupy Wallstreet”

  • Benjamin

    While the movie has many good points, I thought the script and dialogue had many deficiencies. Every line Alfred spoke, for instance, had my toes curling, even if Michael Caine did his best to salvage them. I also found Bale exceedingly poor in the central role – little charisma and an absolutely ridiculously overdone voice as Batman. Hardy was good, but the plot and the themes juvenile at best.

  • Benjamin

    Furthermore, and perhaps crucially, the scenes between Talia/Tate and Bruce/Batman do not really come off in my oppinion. There is little chemistry between the actors and the characters have little reason for being together. It just felt tagged on and out of place.