Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
OSWIECIM, POLAND - JANUARY 27: King Charles III lays a candle during commemorations at Auschwitz-Birkenau in Poland to mark 80 years since the liberation of the concentration camp on January 27, 2025 in Oswiecim, Poland. The Nazis built and operated the Auschwitz complex of concentration camps during World War II initially for slave labor and later for the mass extermination of Jews and other undesirables. Approximately 1.1 million people died at Auschwitz, most of them in the notorious gas chambers of Auschwitz II-Birkenau. The Soviet Army liberated the camp in 1945.
Photo by Aaron Chown – Pool/Getty Images

‘The King personally stepped in’: King Charles overrules late Queen Elizabeth II’s £1.5 billion decision to avoid an international upset

That was maybe a close one.

It’s been nearly three years since Queen Elizabeth II passed away, marking the end of her record 70-year, 214-day monarchy. Opinions of the Royal Family are as varied as they come, but rarely did Elizabeth find herself at the center of negative sentiment.

Recommended Videos

That’s not to say, of course, that Elizabeth was one without fault, and now her son and successor to the British throne, King Charles III, has stepped in to fix one of his mother’s oversights. The oversight in question? Renaming a £1.5 billion submarine so that France doesn’t get mad.

According to a source who spoke with the Express, Charles ordered last year for the HMS Agincourt, a Royal Navy submarine currently under construction, to be renamed to the HMS Achilles. The name “Agincourt” is derived from the Battle of Agincourt; a military conflict that occurred in October 1415 that resulted in an English victory over France in the middle of the Hundred Years’ War. Charles’ decision to rename the vessel, according to a source, came from a place of not wanting to upset France.

Six English Navy vessels have taken the name Agincourt in the past; the submarine that will now be known as HMS Achilles would have been the seventh. The battle’s frequent referencing in the Navy is indicative of its wider cultural and national significance in England, so you can imagine how some high-profile British traditionalists are taking the decision.

Indeed, outrage has been the name of the game in some circles. U.K. Parliament member Lee Anderson of the Reform Party remarked “Why don’t we just go the full hog and rename the English Channel the French Channel?” Meanwhile, former Defense Secretary Grant Shapps said “Renaming the HMS Agincourt is nothing short of sacrilege. This submarine carries a name that honours a defining moment in British history. Under Labour, woke nonsense is being put ahead of tradition and our Armed Forces’ proud heritage.”

Look, I have no skin in the game, but let’s unpack this a bit frankly. France won the Hundred Years’ War, insofar as there can be a winner in a war, and so glorifying a single — admittedly improbable — victory as a “defining moment in British history” carries a similar energy to showing up at someone’s Lifetime Achievement ceremony and gloating about the parking spot you found on the way there.

More importantly, why are we acting like it’s normal to derive national pride from historic instances of conquest and bloodshed, particularly if it’s an instance of conquest and bloodshed within a literal century of egotistical violence both political and bodily? Why is that something to be proud of?

Now, would the French have cared if Charles had decided to let the Agincourt name go through on this submarine? Hard to say for sure, although they probably have more pressing issues on their hands at the moment. Was Charles’ decision — one that invoked peace and respect in every way that matters — ultimately a good one? Sure, why not?

Still, it’s awfully bold to choose a replacement name like Achilles — the Greek mythological hero who seemed invincible, but quite famously harbored a weak spot that led to his ultimate demise — for a military vessel.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte is a freelance writer for We Got This Covered, a graduate of St. Thomas University's English program, a fountain of film opinions, and probably the single biggest fan of Peter Jackson's 'King Kong.' She has written professionally since 2018, and will tackle an idiosyncratic TikTok story with just as much gumption as she does a film review.