'Ant-Man 3' Producer Explains Why The MCU Remains a Relevant Force
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Marvel Studios

‘Ant-Man 3’ producer explains how to keep the MCU feeling relevant

Should the MCU give its creatives their own voice?

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is taking the MCU down a new trajectory by officially kickstarting Phase 5, and its producer Stephen Broussard thinks the reason the cinematic universe has remained relevant over the years is due to the unique voice of its numerous creatives.

Recommended Videos

After the conclusion of the Infinity Saga, which was arguably the biggest movie event in history, Marvel embraced the only creatively sound strategy by experimenting with its tired formula. Considering how most movies and TV shows in Phase 4 turned out, though, it’s safe to say that initiative backfired in Kevin Feige’s face.

Now, Quantumania is going to preside over a period of retraction as Marvel tries to trace back to its roots and bring another overarching narrative into play. Yet, early reviews indicate that even the Ant-Man threequel fails to deliver a truly visceral MCU experience like the good old days of the early 2010s.

Despite this embarrassing turnout, Marvel execs remain optimistic about the company’s prospects. Broussard, in particular, thinks the MCU will remain relevant so long as it respects the unique voices of all the directors and writers who work on it.

“I view my job as supporting [filmmakers] and as supporting their [voices] and putting [them] at the forefront,” he said in an interview with /Film. “Because that is what will keep the MCU relevant; a voice that steps forward that is unique to that film. The interconnectivity is fun, we like that these movies connect. But at the end of the day, [these movies] have to function on their own. And the best way to do that is by empowering a Peyton Reed to bring his voice to the table. James Gunn, Shane Black… I think you see these filmmakers’ voices come through loud and clear.”

Some would argue that giving these filmmakers more creative control led to the convoluted mess of Phase 4 in the first place. Even Kevin Feige has admitted to taking a more head-on approach in Phase 5, so as a counter-argument, it might not be such a good idea to leave every creator to their own devices when you’re trying to weave together an interconnected narrative.

Some of the best stuff from the first three MCU phases happened because Marvel used a combination of creative freedom and supervision on these projects. Indeed, a few artistic compromises here and there might actually be a good idea, even though it may lead to some household names comparing the entire venture to “theme parks.”


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jonathan Wright
Jonathan Wright
Jonathan is a religious consumer of movies, TV shows, video games, and speculative fiction. And when he isn't doing that, he likes to write about them. He can get particularly worked up when talking about 'The Lord of the Rings' or 'A Song of Ice and Fire' or any work of high fantasy, come to think of it.