Ghostbusters

Bill Murray Explains Why He Did A Cameo In The Ghostbusters Reboot

In a recent interview with IndieWire, veteran actor Bill Murray shed some light on why he appeared in 2016's all-female Ghostbusters reboot.

There are plenty of reasons to explain its middling critical reception and poor box office performance, but it doesn’t change the basic facts – 2016’s Ghostbusters reboot failed to capture the attention of longtime fans and series newcomers, and any hope of a follow-up was quickly dashed when the numbers started trickling in. The Paul Feig-directed action flick had a $144 million production budget, and even though it ultimately brought in close to $230 million, it’s likely that Columbia Pictures took a loss once you factor in advertising and other miscellaneous costs.

Recommended Videos

Ever since it was first announced, the reboot drew ire and criticism from all over, with some taking aim at the new, female team of Ghostbusters. A few of the film’s cast members weighed in on the negative attention, and a couple celebs attributed the poor box office run to internet trolls and haters. Recently though, Bill Murray (who played Peter Venkman in the first two movies), sat down with IndieWire and shed some light on why he chose to accept a role in the all-female reboot.

It’s not entirely clear from his interview, but one gets the impression he took on the part to prevent any rumors or speculation that he was not supportive of the franchise’s new direction.

“I was in that movie just because they asked me, and I knew if I said no, I was saying I didn’t support that movie,” Murray told IndieWire. “I felt like, OK, I’m going to support them because I support them as people. So I did that one and I would do this next one.”

Thankfully, it looks like we haven’t seen the last of Peter Venkman. Bill Murray is set to appear in next year’s untitled Ghostbusters project, alongside series mainstays Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver and Annie Potts. If you’re dead set on reliving your favorite poltergeist poaching memories sooner than that though, you should turn your attention to the newly-released 35th anniversary edition Blu-Ray, which contains a few infamous deleted scenes.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article ‘Challengers’ ending explained: Who wins the game for Zendaya’s heart?
Challengers art with Josh O'Connor and Mike Faist reflected on Zendaya's dark glasses
Read Article The history of Chaos Emeralds in the ‘Sonic’ franchise, explained
Chaos Emeralds in Sonic the Hedgehog 2
Read Article What is ‘Darth Vader Syndrome’ and why was it a real issue in the 1980s?
Darth Vader red lightsaber
Read Article How does ‘Knuckles’ set up ‘Sonic the Hedgehog 3’?
Read Article ‘Knuckles’ makes a great case for which other ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ characters need spinoffs
Knuckles and Sonic playing games in the Knuckles spinoff series
Related Content
Read Article ‘Challengers’ ending explained: Who wins the game for Zendaya’s heart?
Challengers art with Josh O'Connor and Mike Faist reflected on Zendaya's dark glasses
Read Article The history of Chaos Emeralds in the ‘Sonic’ franchise, explained
Chaos Emeralds in Sonic the Hedgehog 2
Read Article What is ‘Darth Vader Syndrome’ and why was it a real issue in the 1980s?
Darth Vader red lightsaber
Read Article How does ‘Knuckles’ set up ‘Sonic the Hedgehog 3’?
Read Article ‘Knuckles’ makes a great case for which other ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ characters need spinoffs
Knuckles and Sonic playing games in the Knuckles spinoff series
Author
Shaan Joshi
Shaan Joshi is the gaming editor for We Got This Covered. When he's not spending his time writing about or playing games, he's busy programming them. Alongside his work at WGTC, he has previously contributed to Hardcore Gamer, TechRaptor, Digitally Downloaded, and Inquisitr.