Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
forrest gump

Step aside, ‘Ant-Man 10’: These 3 classics were in theaters together 30 years ago and we demand that Great Art be made again

"Again," as if it didn't probably happen last week.

Picture this: the year is 1994, you’re an average moviegoer, and you need to decide if you’re going to spend your carefully-budgeted funds on a ticket to Forrest Gump, The Shawshank Redemption, or Pulp Fiction. Thirty years on, no greater three-way cinematic war has ever arisen.

Recommended Videos

There is a reason that these three films are still remembered beyond their shared theatrical timeframe. Who could forget Oscar darling Forrest Gump, which followed Tom Hanks on a humorous, yet emotionally resonant romp through American history, and celebrated not taking life too seriously, and instead feeling life as it occurs?

Or what of Pulp Fiction, the influential crime picture and Quentin Tarantino’s primary claim to fame? A film so entrenched in its references and homages, that it continues to be quoted and stolen from to this day?

And then there’s The Shawshank Redemption, the then-overlooked and now very much not-overlooked Stephen King adaptation, whose song of resilience and belief in our ability to rise to the occasion has been sung for generations.

All three are unforgettable films that shared the remarkable privilege of each other’s company. And how is social media choosing to mark their shared thirty-year anniversary? By complaining that movies suck now, apparently. Need evidence? Check out these grouchy exhibits from X.

“They forgot how to make movies since.” “Art was real.” (Etc.) …Is this not completely and utterly fascinating? All of these complaints are being hurled at the movie industry for its reliance on legacy sequels and nostalgia bait, and yet nostalgia for 1994, back when “art was real,” is precisely what’s prompting these very same complaints.

Folks, great art is no more an anomaly today than it was back in 1994. Whoever insists that there are no great movies these days is simply making no effort to seek them out. Did these doomsayers miss the memo on The Iron Claw, Sing Sing, Oppenheimer, Anatomy of a Fall, Whiplash, Licorice Pizza, Moonlight, and far too many other films to count?

Look, I get it; cynicism is easy to latch onto as we all try to navigate the world, and in the context of Hollywood, it’s far from unwarranted (Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, for instance, was a blatantly predatory production). This is all the more reason, however, to be sincere in our efforts to seek out truly great movies. Indeed, if we’d rather complain about the easily-accessible films of today than put in the effort to find the great films of today, then it’s not the film industry that’s the problem; it’s us.

All this to say, don’t ever use social media as a basis for grounding your reality. Most of these accounts probably aren’t real people anyway, and were designed specifically to make the world feel far more hopeless than it actually is. Now, chin up, and go watch The Iron Claw. Bring tissues for the tears, and a stopwatch so as to time your standing ovation.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte is a freelance writer for We Got This Covered, a graduate of St. Thomas University's English program, a fountain of film opinions, and probably the single biggest fan of Peter Jackson's 'King Kong.' She has written professionally since 2018, and will tackle an idiosyncratic TikTok story with just as much gumption as she does a film review.