Just another day — Donald Trump lands $16 million, and suddenly the word 'bribery' is trending – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Omar Havana/Getty Images

Just another day — Donald Trump lands $16 million, and suddenly the word ‘bribery’ is trending

Horsetrading or highway robbery?

Paramount Global’s recent $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump has sparked strong reactions from lawmakers who claim it amounts to bribery.

Recommended Videos

The settlement, which relates to a lawsuit Trump filed against CBS and Paramount over a 60 Minutes interview, has become a point of heated debate. According to Politico, Several prominent Democrats, including Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden, have publicly criticized the settlement. Warren stated it “could be bribery in plain sight,” while Wyden went further, claiming on social media that Paramount had paid Trump a bribe to secure merger approval.

However, legal experts have dismissed these bribery accusations, with former Justice Department public integrity section chief John Keller describing the situation as more like “political horsetrading” than bribery. The experts say that proving criminal bribery would require clear evidence of an explicit agreement between Trump and Paramount regarding the merger approval.

What the settlement means for Paramount’s future

The settlement stems from Trump’s October lawsuit claiming that60 Minutes‘ damaged his election chances through deceptive editing of an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Despite Paramount’s lawyers initially defending against the lawsuit as baseless, the company agreed to the settlement without issuing an apology to Trump.

Legal experts explain that for any bribery charges to stick, prosecutors would need to prove that Paramount executives specifically negotiated with Trump to ensure Federal Communications Commission approval of their pending merger with Skydance Media in exchange for the settlement payment.

Former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason noted that while such dealings might feel corrupt, there’s a significant difference between general corruption and criminal bribery. He emphasized that timing coincidences alone would not be enough to prove criminal conduct.

The situation has also caught shareholders’ attention. The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a Paramount shareholder, has hired attorney Abbe Lowell and plans to file a lawsuit against the company over the settlement. They have already requested communications between Paramount directors about the settlement decision.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sadik Hossain
Sadik Hossain
Freelance Writer
Sadik Hossain is a professional writer with over 7 years of experience in numerous fields. He has been following political developments for a very long time. To convert his deep interest in politics into words, he has joined We Got This Covered recently as a political news writer and wrote quite a lot of journal articles within a very short time. His keen enthusiasm in politics results in delivering everything from heated debate coverage to real-time election updates and many more.