'Take Kharg Island': Lindsey Graham told Trump to seize Iran's oil hub weeks ago, now he's on Fox News saying the opposite – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0.

‘Take Kharg Island’: Lindsey Graham told Trump to seize Iran’s oil hub weeks ago, now he’s on Fox News saying the opposite

The script flipped.

Lindsey Graham (R-SC) just pulled a U-turn, walking back his earlier call to seize Iran’s Kharg Island, a major oil hub in the Persian Gulf. Just weeks ago, Graham had urged Donald Trump to send U.S. forces to capture the island, which handles around 90% of Iran’s oil exports. Then, in a surprising reversal, he went on Fox News and said the U.S. shouldn’t take the island at all.

Recommended Videos

Graham first made his call on March 22, when he appeared on Fox News Sunday. At the time, the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran was just three weeks old. “Keep it up for a few more weeks, take Kharg Island, where all of the resources they have to produce oil,” Graham said. “Control that island. Let this regime die on a vine.”

Graham also referenced the Battle of Iwo Jima, a major World War II conflict where U.S. Marines suffered heavy losses. “We did Iwo Jima, we can do this,” he said, adding that his “money’s always on the Marines.”

Graham’s flip-flop on Kharg Island drew sharp criticism from fellow Republicans

Then, on Monday’s edition of Hannity, Graham reversed course. “I’m not a real advocate of taking Kharg Island,” he said. “I think we oughta tell the Iranians we will destroy it from the air.” He claimed this approach would still achieve his goal of stopping Iran from funding terrorism and advancing its nuclear program.

The reversal drew quick criticism from some of his Republican colleagues. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) said Graham had a pattern of backing military action without thinking through the consequences, stating that “he was wrong about Iraq, he was wrong about Afghanistan, and now he’s wrong about Iran.” It is worth noting that Trump has previously claimed the authority to wage war without congressional approval, a stance that has drawn its own share of controversy.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), an Air Force veteran, was also outraged. She said Graham was showing a “lack of respect for life” and treating U.S. troops like “expendable cattle.” She pointed out that the Battle of Iwo Jima resulted in over 26,000 American casualties, making it one of the bloodiest battles in U.S. Marine Corps history. For Luna, invoking that battle so casually to push for another military operation was deeply troubling.

The criticism did not stop there. Graham’s shifting position raised broader questions about how hawkish lawmakers in Washington approach military decisions. Many observers noted that senators who push aggressively for military action rarely face the consequences that soldiers on the ground do, and Luna’s response reflected that frustration directly.

Meanwhile, the broader conflict in the region continues to escalate. The U.S. and Iran have exchanged fire in the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has restricted since the war began on February 28. In response, the U.S. has imposed a blockade on Iran, pushing oil prices sharply higher, with Brent crude futures trading around $114 a barrel. 

This comes amid a wider pattern of Trump using global oil supply as a geopolitical pressure tool, which has rattled markets and drawn international concern. Graham’s reversal has left many questioning his judgment, especially given how firm and clear his original position was. As the U.S. and Israel continue their war with Iran, his shifting stance on Kharg Island is something that both policymakers and political observers will be keeping a close eye on.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sadik Hossain
Sadik Hossain
Freelance Writer
Sadik Hossain is a professional writer with over 7 years of experience in numerous fields. He has been following political developments for a very long time. To convert his deep interest in politics into words, he has joined We Got This Covered recently as a political news writer and wrote quite a lot of journal articles within a very short time. His keen enthusiasm in politics results in delivering everything from heated debate coverage to real-time election updates and many more.