Why Did Target Pull an 'Offensive' Halloween Costume After Backlash?W
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by JeepersMedia, CC BY 2.0.
Image by JeepersMedia, CC BY 2.0.

Target hurriedly pulls ‘offensive’ Halloween costume as backlash of ‘how did this even get approved?’ hits them: ‘You’re so cooked’

Target has been wading through troubled waters for a while now.

Target has issued a public apology and pulled a children’s Halloween costume from its shelves following intense social media backlash. Critics accused the retail giant of selling merchandise that evoked 19th-century blackface and racist minstrel show imagery.

Recommended Videos

The controversial item was sold under Target’s seasonal in-house brand, Hyde & EEK! Boutique, putting the responsibility for the product squarely on the retailer.

The corporate misstep on Aug. 24 has reignited criticism of Target’s internal oversight, particularly following its high-profile rollback of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The fact that nobody within the company appeared to flag the costume before it went on sale has only added to that criticism.

The costume resembles Jim Crow-era caricatures

The costume featured an orange-and-black printed bodysuit, black gloves and a dark mesh face mask with an exaggerated, wide, toothy grin. The backlash intensified because the product image featured a young Black child modeling the outfit. Observers noted that the child’s pose — standing with one leg and one arm raised while waving — closely resembled caricatures historically used to mock and demean Black people during the Jim Crow era.

As the backlash grew, Target pulled the product listing from its website and issued an apology on Instagram. The retailer acknowledged that the costume should never have been sold and confirmed that it was being removed, including from third-party platforms.

Comedian LaTrez Anderson voiced the frustration, writing, “Target, for real? I’m not surprised, but this is a new low.”

Another user simply wrote, “You’re cooked,” suggesting the controversy could fuel further calls for boycotts.

But perhaps one commenter summarized the issue best: “The amount of people this costume had to go through to get approved says a lot. What year is it!?”

Others were less interested in Target’s explanation and more stunned that the costume had made it through the company’s approval process in the first place.

Historically, minstrel shows featured white performers wearing blackface to promote harmful and exaggerated stereotypes of Black people. Social media users quickly began sharing side-by-side comparisons between Target’s product photography and historical Jim Crow-era illustrations. The resemblance prompted a wave of one-star reviews and widespread condemnation online.

This is a tangible example of cultural blindess

The incident has also brought renewed scrutiny to Target’s 2025 decision to roll back several DEI initiatives in response to changing political and corporate pressures. That decision had already attracted criticism from community leaders and others who questioned what the changes would mean for the company’s approach to diversity.

Now, the Halloween costume has given those concerns a much more tangible example.

While the incident may ultimately have been an internal oversight, it comes at an especially sensitive time for Target. The retailer has been dealing with declining sales and a leadership transition, making another public relations crisis particularly unwelcome.

For now, Target has apologized and removed the costume. Beyond that, there has been little public accountability for how the product made it through the approval process in the first place. For many of the people offended by the costume, that may be the part of this controversy that is hardest to ignore.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author
Image of Fred Onyango
Fred Onyango
Fred Onyango is an entertainment journalist who primarily focuses on the intersection of entertainment, society, and politics. He has been writing about the entertainment industry for five years, covering celebrity, music, and film through the lens of their impact on society and politics. He has reported from the London Film Festival and was among the first African entertainment journalists invited to cover the Sundance Film Festival. Fun fact—Fred is also a trained pilot.