Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
JK-Rowling-Daniel-Radcliffe-as-Harry-Potter
(L)Photo by Taylor Hill/FilmMagic (R) Image via Warner Bros.

‘HBO stands by greed and money’: Max’s shocking J.K. Rowling decision is an unforgiveable curse for ‘Harry Potter’ fans

Yet another way to soil an iconic franchise.

HBO’s recent announcement about its Harry Potter TV reboot is all the proof you need about capitalism’s blatant disregard for the marginalized.

Recommended Videos

As a result, fans are left shaking their heads in frustration. While the idea of revisiting the magical world of Hogwarts in a long-form series might sound like a dream come true, there’s a major issue casting a shadow over the excitement: J.K. Rowling’s involvement. And surprise surprise, money beat magic in this round. 

The Controversy

J.K Rowling, once celebrated as the creative mind behind one of the most beloved franchises in modern history, has become a divisive figure due to her controversial views on transgender rights. Her tweets and essays on gender identity, which she frames as advocating for women’s rights, have been widely criticized as blatantly transphobic. Major fan communities like MuggleNet and The Leaky Cauldron have severed ties with her, and even Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson have spoken out in support of trans rights, making their stances crystal clear.

Now, under Warner Bros. Discovery’s new leadership, Rowling is stepping back into the spotlight, not just as the creator of the Harry Potter universe but as a key figure in this reboot. HBO’s chief, Casey Bloys, confirmed Rowling is “very, very involved” in the show’s development, including in the selection process for the writer and director. He also downplayed concerns, stating that her past statements haven’t impacted casting or hiring decisions. However, it’s a slap in the faces of trans individuals and allies that Rowling’s comments are seen as statements of the past, and therefore unimportant to present decision-making. When, in fact, she continues to maintain her anti-trans rhetoric to this very day.

The fans are simply NOT happy

Let’s be real — Rowling’s involvement isn’t just a minor concern for fans. For many, it’s a dealbreaker. Social media erupted after HBO’s announcement, with fans criticizing the network’s decision to align so closely with someone whose views they find harmful. One X user summed up the sentiment perfectly:  “This is incredibly disappointing on the part of HBO. J.K. Rowling’s views actively target members of the LGBTQ community. It’s an evil, hateful ‘personal view,’ and it’s disgusting that a major corporation would defend that.”

Another commented, “What a lengthy way for HBO to say they don’t give a sh-t about trans people,” and the notion that “HBO stands by greed and money” is also making the rounds.

The backlash isn’t just about Rowling’s views — it’s also about the message HBO is sending by prioritizing her involvement. Fans have pointed out that, just a few years ago, such statements might have gotten someone in Hollywood blacklisted. But now, HBO is comfortable not only ignoring the controversy, but doubling down by saying the series will “benefit” from her input. For many who grew up with Harry Potter, this decision feels like a betrayal. 

The books and movies have always carried themes of love, acceptance, and standing up to injustice. Rowling’s statements, which some interpret as denying the existence and validity of transgender individuals, feel fundamentally at odds with those values.

The question for fans becomes: Can you separate the art from the artist? For many, the answer is “no.”  As such, some fans have pledged to boycott the reboot, unwilling to support a project so closely tied to Rowling. The frustration is palpable, with some pointing out that this controversy could have been avoided by creating something original within the Wizarding World — without Rowling’s direct involvement. HBO’s decision might keep the cash flowing, but it has clearly left a sour taste in the mouths of many fans.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Demi Phillips
Demi Phillips
Demilade Phillips covers entertainment news and other exciting topics for We Got This Covered. When he's not writing, he's walking endlessly through Lisbon's narrow roads, discovering new rave spots, watching anime, and streaming every Mariah Carey song out there.