Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
P'Nut the squirrel and his owners
Screengrabs via @peanut_the_squirrel12/Instagram

‘Well internet, you WON.’: What happened to P’Nut the squirrel?

Truly heartbreaking.

Between Peggy the dog and Molly the magpie being separated – and subsequently reunited thanks to the international uproar – and Albert the alligator being seized from its owner, one would think that 2024 had enough stories of unlikely friendships being forcefully broken. Apparently, it has not, because the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) the same governmental entity that took Albert, decided to go after P’Nut the squirrel.

Recommended Videos

I had heard of P’Nut a while ago, when the squirrel and his “Mom” Mark Longo’s story was featured on The Dodo. In the video, the strong bond between the two was evident, and so was Mark’s adoration for his “best friend.”

Seven and a half years ago, Mark was walking down the street in downtown Manhattan when he happened upon a baby squirrel whose mother was hit by a car. When Mark ran out into the middle of the street to try to save him, the “little black ball of fuzz” crawled up his leg as if the baby knew he’d found someone who would take care of him. Upon getting home, Mark contacted several vets and rehabbers and was told that bringing P’Nut to them was not an option, as that would likely result in the little fellow’s euthanasia.

For those who would assume Mark ought to have released P’Nut back into the wild as soon as he could, he did in fact try to. When P’Nut recovered about 8 months after the start of his rehab, Mark and his partner released him. But a day and a half later, the squirrel came back of his own volition after getting attacked. That traumatic experience ended his wildlife career, according to Mark. But, all things considered, P’Nut was enjoying a good life.

The individuals who went out of their way to contact the DEC, either did not know the unlikely pair’s story or thought they stood on moral high ground when they made this ultimately cruel decision. If it is the latter, well, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Because the DEC took P’Nut from his loving home not for the little guy’s sake, but to euthanize him. And euthanize him they did.

Why was P’Nut taken?

If P’Nut was not sick, and clearly not suffering or causing anyone any harm, there was no reason to take this extreme action. Even if having a squirrel as a pet is against New York state law. As in Albert the alligator’s example, the DEC has quite strict laws when it comes to the ownership of wild species.

As Mark’s Instagram post describes, at 10 am on Wednesday, Oct. 30, the DEC arrived at his residence and seized P’Nut to be euthanized. In the aftermath of the tragic separation, a change.org petition was started with the purpose of advocating for the squirrel’s return to his rightful home, and a GoFundMe page was set up to help with any legal fees necessary in the process. Unfortunately, those donations and legal fees will now go to bringing justice to P’Nut unjust killing.

The New York Times quoted the DEC’s statement on the issue:

“Following multiple reports from the public about the potentially unsafe housing of wildlife that could carry rabies and the illegal keeping of wildlife as pets, D.E.C. conducted an investigation. D.E.C.’s investigation is ongoing and additional information will be provided as it becomes available.”

Before P’Nut’s fate was known, Mark Longo posted two video updates on Instagram, expressing gratitude for the wave of support in both:

Mark and his partner cannot allow this distressing situation to halt their busy daily routines, as the couple also run a non-profit sanctuary where they currently care for about 300 animals. When the DEC came to his house and stayed for five hours, Mark was unable to feed his horses neither breakfast nor lunch.

In addition to P’Nut, the DEC also forcefully removed Fred, a baby raccoon they were rehabilitating with the intention of releasing back into the wild. Both were euthanized to test for rabies, according to the DEC.

fred the racoon who was euthanized by the DEC
Fred the baby raccoon (via peanut_the_squirrel12/Instagram)

It appears that P’Nut might have bitten one of the DEC officers who came to steal him away from his home. This, if true, is to be expected. If strange people came into your house and forcefully grabbed you to haul you away you would fight back as well, anyone would. It would be weird to have a higher standard of conduct for a squirrel under these circumstances.

An animal can only be tested for rabies if they are dead because testing requires a brain tissue sample. However, they could have isolated Fred and P’Nut to watch for symptoms – seeing that, since they were mostly indoors or kept around the property, the probability of having rabies was slim to none. But, the DEC’s logic must have been that waiting would leave the potentially infected person with less chance of survival.

How could this have been avoided? Not treat an animal lover like a criminal and separate a family from one beloved pet they’d had for 7 years and another – little more than a baby – they were taking care of until he could be released.

Even though neither Mark Longo nor his wife had the needed permit, P’Nut was in the process of getting legalized as an educational pet. Moreover, laws are social constructs, we should follow them and be law-abiding citizens, but they are not always, in every case, irrevocably and without fault, on the side of what’s most ethical. To consider a situation from an ethical perspective is to analyze it with all its components and conditions, big picture, and minuscule details alike.

In the end, if we reach a logic-based ethical judgment that does not necessarily align with the written words of the law – in this case, New York state law – we should still have an inkling of what “the right thing” is at the end of the day.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Margarida Bastos
Margarida Bastos
Margarida has been a content writer for nearly 3 years. She is passionate about the intricacies of storytelling, including its ways of expression across different media: films, TV, books, plays, anime, visual novels, video games, podcasts, D&D campaigns... Margarida graduated from a professional theatre high school, holds a BA in English with Creative Writing, and is currently working on her MA thesis.