Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says Trump belongs on a golf course, not the Oval Office, and she has a 25th Amendment argument to back it up – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by nrkbeta, CC BY-SA 2.0.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says Trump belongs on a golf course, not the Oval Office, and she has a 25th Amendment argument to back it up

Not doing the job could be the best thing he did for the country.

New York Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines after an interview with Pablo Manriquez on Capitol Hill. When asked about President Donald Trump‘s work ethic during ongoing military tensions with Iran, she did not hold back on the risks she sees in his leadership.

Recommended Videos

She noted that while it is concerning to see a president golfing during a crisis, there may be a silver lining in keeping him away from power. She said, “Obviously, it’s awful that this guy is playing golf, but, in a way, we’re already seeing that some of the most important military decision-makers in the country are trying to keep him out of consequential decisions.” 

According to The Independent, she continued, “So in some ways, you kind of want this guy on a golf course more than you want him in the Oval Office.” Ocasio-Cortez pointed out that if high-level officials feel the need to bypass the commander in chief to avoid erratic decision-making, it raises serious questions about his fitness for the job. 

The 25th Amendment debate is gaining real traction, even among former Trump allies

She argued, “But that also calls into question the 25th Amendment, because if he is being… if the determination is that Donald Trump cannot be trusted in the Situation Room in unfolding scenarios then he’s not fit to be president.”

The congresswoman was referencing a Wall Street Journal report published on April 18, 2026, which alleged that Trump was excluded from a military briefing over his behavior concerning a rescue mission for two U.S. airmen downed in Iran. 

According to the report, the decision to keep him out was driven by concerns over his volatile temperament. The piece described Trump engaged in an hours-long tantrum, during which he allegedly ranted about the potential for a failed rescue to mark the end of his presidency, while drawing comparisons to the 1979 Iran hostage crisis.

In response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the president, stating that he “remained a steady leader our country needs.” She also pointed to his campaign promises regarding Iranian nuclear capabilities, asserting that the mission was a noble operation.

According to The Telegraph, the 25th Amendment conversation has recently drawn in former Trump allies as well. Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly turned against him after he threatened to bomb Iran, telling reporters, “How can any person that is mentally stable call for an entire civilisation of people to be murdered? That’s not tough rhetoric. It’s insanity.” 

Even former Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly expressed frustration on her radio show, saying, “I’m sick of this s—. Can’t he just behave like a normal human?” Despite the growing calls, political experts remain skeptical that the 25th Amendment will actually be invoked. 

The process requires the support of Vice President JD Vance and a majority of the cabinet, and given that many of these individuals remain loyal to Trump, such a move is widely seen as unlikely.

Tucker Carlson is among those who have recently expressed regret over helping Trump win the election, reflecting a broader shift in sentiment among some former supporters. Jen Psaki, speaking to Stephen A. Smith, noted that while she understands why people are calling for it, the reality is that it probably won’t happen.

The constitutional hurdles are significant. If the cabinet and vice president were to initiate removal, Trump could challenge it, forcing a battle in Congress that would require a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate to finalize. 

Cass Sunstein, a Harvard law professor who worked on similar procedures during the Reagan administration, described this as the “hard way” to remove a president, emphasizing that the focus is usually on national stability and avoiding disruption to elections. Even so, 50 House Democrats recently introduced a bill aimed at creating a congressionally-appointed commission to assess presidential fitness. 

Maryland Representative Jamie Raskin argued the move is a matter of national security, citing Trump’s threats toward Iran, his insults directed at the Pope, and his online sharing of an artistic image depicting himself as Jesus Christ. Whether this all reflects a calculated strategy or something more concerning remains the central debate in Washington today.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sadik Hossain
Sadik Hossain
Freelance Writer
Sadik Hossain is a professional writer with over 7 years of experience in numerous fields. He has been following political developments for a very long time. To convert his deep interest in politics into words, he has joined We Got This Covered recently as a political news writer and wrote quite a lot of journal articles within a very short time. His keen enthusiasm in politics results in delivering everything from heated debate coverage to real-time election updates and many more.