Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Andrea Riseborough Oscars nomination controversy, explained
Image via Momentum Pictures

Andrea Riseborough Oscars nomination controversy, explained

Why is everybody up in arms about a small independent movie?

Andrea Riseborough is a distinguished actress who has won acclaim for her performances in the United Kingdom. Now a name actress across the Atlantic, she’s made a habit of appearing in quirky independent dramas and horror films. But her latest film has caused quite a stir, but not for anything on screen.

Recommended Videos

Her latest film To Leslie has seen widespread acclaim and an Academy Award nomination for Riseborough, but not without ruffling feathers within the industry.

Andrea Riseborough’s To Leslie nomination controversy, explained

To Leslie debuted at SXSW in March 2022 to positive reviews, before enduring a seven month wait for a more widespread theatrical release. The box office returns were far from impressive in this awards season vehicle for Riseborough, with the independent film grossing just $27,000 from a budget somewhere in the region below $1 million.

The critical reviews were strong, covering up the disappointing gross – although box office success is hardly the intention with a drama like this. The long game is always the next awards season. When Riseborough was confirmed as one of the nominees for Best Actress in Jan. 2023, it led to an outcry over her perceived canvassing during the voting season for the Oscars. To Leslie got a massive, albeit arguably artificial, word of mouth boost from A-list friends of the cast and crew on social media.

Director Michael Morris and Riseborough hired publicists in order to fuel a Best Actress nomination discussion, with the film very clearly a vehicle for Riseborough to land her first nomination ever. Within the Academy guidelines and laws for voting are anti-lobbying rules to prevent something like this from happening.

The Academy launched an official investigation into the situation days after the nominees were announced, before delivering a verdict on Jan. 31. Despite condemning the use of social media campaigns, the Academy established it would not rescind Riseborough’s nomination. The Academy did confirm their concerns over the campaigning, although this is a slippery slope.

The Academy and all major awards shows fall victim to this in a somewhat different guise, with studios usually the ones to canvass to voters through a website or campaign — albeit less directly. The difference appears to be Morris and Riseborough did it as their public personas, without the façade of a studio.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jamie Dunkin
Jamie Dunkin
Writer for We Got This Covered, and other sites in the GAMURS Group. Football fan, LEGO enthusiast, and beer enjoyer. @jamie_dunkin on Twitter