Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni are seen on the set of "It Ends with Us" on January 12, 2024 in Jersey City, New Jersey. // Actress Amber Heard departs the Fairfax County Courthouse on June 1, 2022 in Fairfax, Virginia.
Photos by Jose Perez/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images/Win McNamee/Getty Images

‘It’s gonna be Amber Heard all over again’: A court date has been set for Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, and we’re already dreading it

Have we learned from our mistak- hahahah, sorry, couldn't even finish the question, because of course we haven't.

The Justin Baldoni/Blake Lively saga has a new chapter, but it’s one we’ve all read before, and it wasn’t particularly enjoyable. The two actors have been granted their day in court if they can’t settle their respective lawsuits against one another before then.

Recommended Videos

Trial is set for March 2026

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni in 'It Ends With Us'.
Image via Sony Pictures

According to WDSU, New York federal judge, Lewis J. Liman, has set a combined court date for both lawsuits for Mar. 9, 2026 — an entire year from now. Before that, however, Lively and Baldoni are expected to attend a pre-trial conference as soon as Feb. 3 of this year. According to the outlet, lawyers are to come “prepared to address complaints about pre-trial publicity and attorney conduct.”

The latter warning comes in response to a letter from Lively’s attorney, Michael Gottlieb, to Liman citing “growing concerns” over “extrajudicial misconduct” from Baldoni’s attorney Bryan Freedman, per the Daily Mail.

Freedman has appeared in several television and web shows to discuss the case, making comments which Gottlieb describes as “inflammatory.” Lively’s representative argues that the opposing attorney is trying to “influence proceedings and the public perception.” His letter also mentions that Freedman has been preparing a website to share “strategically selected documents and communications” between the two actors in order to “torpedo … Lively’s career for good.”

Among other things, both sides have accused each other of orchestrating smear campaigns to turn public opinion against the other. In Baldoni’s case, he tapped publicist Melissa Nathan and her PR firm, The Agency PR, ahead of It Ends With Us‘ release. Nathan, many have pointed out, previously worked with another man accused of sexual misconduct and who ultimately won over the people’s sympathy through cutesy TikTok videos and a very public trial — Johnny Depp.

Why a “Baldoni v. Lively” trial cannot be a repeat of “Depp v. Heard”

Blake Lively as Lily and Justin Baldoni as Ryle in It Ends With Us
Photo via Sony Pictures Releasing

With the news of the trial, concerns have risen that we’re in for another media circus that, much like what happened in 2022, could become more about public perception and affection than the hard facts.

Over on X, people shared their reactions. “It’s gonna be Amber Heard all over again. I’m gonna be sick,” said one user. “Please don’t make this another Amber Heard and Johnny Depp,” said another. That trial also concerned accusations of defamation from both sides. Primarily, Depp accused Heard of defaming him in an op-ed where she spoke about his physical and sexual abuse.

In the end, Depp was largely victorious, with a jury ruling that Heard’s descriptions in the piece were false and that she had defamed her ex-husband with actual malice.

Since then, however, many have questioned the role public opinion and social media played in the verdict, especially considering that, in 2020, a U.K. judge had ruled in favor of The Sun‘s reporting on Heard’s “wife-beater” allegations, stating that they had “been proved to the civil standard.” The support for Depp, especially on social media, was fierce, widespread, and often vile, particularly pertaining to crude video edits of emotional moments from the trial.

The Lively/Baldoni legal battle has become intrinsically tied to that case thanks to the undeniable similarities and the common link in the men’s PR squad. Plus, Lively’s lawsuit contains chilling texts shared by her co-star’s camp, where they discuss the creation of fake social media profiles to control the narrative. In one message, Nathan remarks, “The majority of socials are so pro Justin and I don’t even agree with half of them lol.” In another, Baldoni’s other publicist Jennifer Abel comments, “It’s actually sad because it just shows you have people really want to hate on women.”

The whole thing has blown the issue of controlled public narratives wide open, making people reevaluate their stances on many of these celebrity feuds — chief of which, thanks to its dimension and gravity, is Depp v. Heard. Thankfully, New York State has largely limited camera access to courtrooms which, if Lively and Baldoni make it to trial, could at least contain some of the perverse ridicule Heard was subjected to in 2022.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Francisca Tinoco
Francisca Tinoco
Francisca is a pop culture enthusiast and film expert. Her Bachelor's Degree in Communication Sciences from Nova University in Portugal and Master's Degree in Film Studies from Oxford Brookes University in the UK have allowed her to combine her love for writing with her love for the movies. She has been a freelance writer and content creator for five years, working in both the English and Portuguese languages for various platforms, including WGTC.