Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
X-Men-7-Dark-Phoenix-Jennifer-Lawrence-Michael-1

10 Reasons Why X-Men: Apocalypse Is The Worst In The First Class Trilogy

X-Men: Apocalypse is shaping up to be the worst-reviewed movie in the X-Men franchise. After 16 years of films, even taking into account The Last Stand, Apocalypse has taken the prize to be the lowest-rated entry into the series (with the exception of Wolverine spinoff Origins. But we prefer not to talk about that one).
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

6) The Period Setting Is Under-Utilized

Recommended Videos

X-Men-Apocalypse

First Class approached 1962 with a swinging 60s idealism, mixed with Mad Men-style gender politics and fashions, and burgeoning Cold War tensions. Days of Future Past similarly embraced its 1970s setting, adopting a paranoid thriller sensibility, with Vietnam, Nixon and the counterculture very much part of the fabric of the movie. In First Class and Days, the period settings didn’t just provide a quirky backdrop – they actually informed the movies.

In Apocalypse, it’s safe to say the period setting is under-utilized. There are lazy references to the 80s – a conversation about Return of the Jedi in a mall, Eurythmics on the soundtrack – that feel tacked on rather than organic. Where First Class and Days were intrinsically tied to their respective time periods, Apocalypse could be set in any time and the story wouldn’t be changed much. It’s quite simply a waste of one of the First Class trilogy’s best features.

5) Too Much of What Happens In The Film Is Extraneous

moira mactaggert apocalypse

There’s a strong suspicion, based on how quickly Bryan Singer and Simon Kinberg put the film together, and judging by the final product itself, that Apocalypse was made without the team having a clear plan in place for it. The whole movie reads like an early draft that went to shoot too early: under-developed characters, a bursting cast list, ample plotholes – as well as the fact that so much of the film is packed with storylines and characters it doesn’t need.

There’s always too much going on in Apocalypse, and the worst part is that so much of it never leads anywhere. There’s no need for the presence of either Moira MacTaggert or Caliban (surely Apocalypse is powerful enough to find mutants himself?), no need for Magneto’s trip to Auschwitz and no need for the scene with Earth’s nuclear arsenal. It’s all extraneous fat, which further drafts of the script would have rightly burned off.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author