Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Star Trek

7 Things We Want To See From Star Trek 4

Star Trek 4 was not a surefire thing after the slightly disappointing box office returns of 2016's Star Trek Beyond. However, Paramount decided to press ahead with the project and came up with a great new hook for the fourth adventure in the rebooted series - the script from writers J. D. Payne and Patrick McKay sees time travel unite Chris Pine's Captain Kirk with his deceased dad and hero, George Kirk (as played by Chris Hemsworth in 2009's Star Trek). S.J. Clarkson was then signed up to direct, making her the first female director in the history of the movie franchise. And, no, just to clarify - this is entirely separate from Quentin Tarantino's own Trek film.
This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

Another Original Villain

Recommended Videos

The modern Star Trek movies have taken an interesting approach to adapting the mythology of the original canon. 2009’s Star Trek wisely told an original story that reworked the timeline. Even though the villain of the piece was a Romulan, Eric Bana’s Nero was an original creation. Likewise, Beyond introduced Idris Elba’s Krall, a mysterious alien tyrant who was revealed to be – spoilers! – a mutated former Starfleet captain who had become disillusioned with the ways of the Federation.

In Star Trek Into Darkness, however, the decision was made to effectively remake the most beloved Trek movie of them all, The Wrath of Khan, with Benedict Cumberbatch in the role of the superhuman antagonist. Though the British thespian was as good as ever, the inclusion of the character was handled poorly – remember them trying to fool us into thinking he wasn’t playing Khan? – and generally it just upset fans that the franchise was redoing iconic elements from its past rather than trying something new.

Clearly, that approach didn’t work and the best course for Star Trek 4 would be to include another fresh villain. What worked best about Khan and Krall was that they both reflected the real-life political landscape and had something to say about modern society. Trek always had a great brain on its shoulders and we’d like to see more of this in the next entry in the series.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Christian Bone
Christian Bone
Christian Bone is a Staff Writer/Editor at We Got This Covered and has been cluttering up the internet with his thoughts on movies and TV for over a decade, ever since graduating with a Creative Writing degree from the University of Winchester. As Marvel Beat Leader, he can usually be found writing about the MCU and yet, if you asked him, he'd probably say his favorite superhero film is 'The Incredibles.'