Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Thor Love and Thunder Chris Hemsworth
Image via Marvel Studios

Taika Waititi’s ‘Thor’ comes under fire yet again for an apparently pointless plot point

The ophthalmology controversy continues.

By no stretch of the imagination is Thor: Love and Thunder the least favorite of all the Thor films. Even with a $250 million budget, the movie landed on a number of worst of the year lists. Now people are bemoaning a seemingly senseless plot point in the movie.

Recommended Videos

Over on the Marvel Studios subreddit, someone pointed out that Thor lost his eye in Ragnarok, but got it back early in Love and Thunder. What was the point of losing it then, they asked?

“Serious question, was there any reason thor lost his eye in Ragnarok if he just got a new one so early in his next appearance?” It’s a good question and one that deserves an answer. There were quite a few theories about this.

The most upvoted comment said the eyepatch “kept falling off” during the filming of the movie so the the original plan was to just use CGI to fill it in.

“Rather than use up the CGI budget they added this part in reshoots to give Thor a new eye, even it probably been cheaper and looked better to just add a strap to the eyepatch.”

A few people pointed out that the eyepatch looks killer and one said it “served as a good reminder and visualization for what the character has been through. I’m disappointed that it got reverted so quickly.”

There’s another line of that the eyepatch was intentionally supposed to make Thor look like Odin.

“Which was the entire reason for it occurring. He was becoming Odin,” someone commented. “But they seemed to have dumped that logical path. Although he does have a daughter that enjoys killing now.”

Someone else pointed out Thor’s other more Odin-like actions, like how he “bestowed his own blessing on Mjolnir (unwittingly, but still)” and “tapped into the Odinforce (I think) to turn a bunch of children into lightning-spewing warriors in his latest movie.”

“The transformation into Odin is progressing nicely,” they said.

There’s also the fact that Thor went through something kind of similar when he became overweight Thor. One commenter said that when Thor “loses” his eye he “immediately gets it back” and when he gets “fat and depressed” he immediately gets “shredded and happy.”

“Thor: Whatever happens is reversed thus making it feel cheap and inconsequential in his story and character arc,” they said.

The lesson here could be that Love and Thunder is simply a bad movie with or without the eyepatch plot hole. That does seem to be the easiest explanation.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
related content
Related Content
Author
Image of Jon Silman
Jon Silman
Jon Silman is a stand-up comic and hard-nosed newspaper reporter (wait, that was the old me). Now he mostly writes about Brie Larson and how the MCU is nose diving faster than that 'Black Adam' movie did. He has a Zelda tattoo (well, Link) and an insatiable love of the show 'Below Deck.'