Why Are CNN, MS Now, and Politico Suing Trump Administration?
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by the White House, Public Domain

Trump banned three news outlets from White House. Now they sue administration citing First Amendment violation

According to Trump, this is an assault on "fake news."

President Trump is now facing a legal challenge after his administration barred three news outlets from covering the White House last week. CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filed a lawsuit on Monday in district court in Washington, D.C., claiming the move violates the First Amendment and disrupts their ability to inform the public about government activities, The Hill reported.

Recommended Videos

The attorneys representing these organizations argued in their filing that the ban “could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles.” The lawsuit contends that the block “retaliates against protected newsgathering and speech in violation of the First Amendment.”

The suit claims the administration is using this ban to coerce more favorable coverage from these outlets, while also trying to deter other journalists from reporting on stories that President Trump might find unfavorable. The lawsuit explicitly asks the court to “immediately enjoin enforcement of the ban,” noting that the current situation is “already severely impeding the ability of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO to cover the President and his administration.”

Trump denies that this is an attack on the free press

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly. He is the same judge who oversaw the White House’s temporary ban on a press credential belonging to former CNN reporter Jim Acosta during President Trump’s first term.

President Trump addressed the situation earlier on Monday through a post on Truth Social. He pushed back against the idea that he is attacking the press, stating, “The White House is not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish.” Instead, he argued that the administration is “instituting an assault on the FAKE NEWS.”

He further described the news outlets by saying, “It is corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control.” He added, “It is a threat to our National Security, and must be stopped, NOW!”

The President originally announced the ban on Friday, citing what he characterized as “fake news.” This decision has already triggered a response from the broader media community. On Monday, the TV pool responsible for covering the President’s daily movements decided to boycott those responsibilities. They did this in a show of solidarity with CNN, which is one of the member outlets.

In a joint statement regarding the boycott, the networks made their position clear. “The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government,” the networks wrote. “No administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting.”


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author