Activist and Air Force Veteran sue to block White House UFC match, claims it’s for ‘the 80th anniversary of Donald Trump's birth’ – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image courtesy @HillaryClinton / X

Activist and Air Force Veteran sue to block White House UFC match, claims it’s for ‘the 80th anniversary of Donald Trump’s birth’

The plaintiff lawyer characterized the event as fundamentally corrupt.

A federal lawsuit filed on June 6 seeks to put a stop to the upcoming UFC fight card scheduled for the White House South Lawn. The Public Integrity Project filed the suit on behalf of a political activist and an Air Force veteran and aims to halt the event set for June 14, which happens to be President Donald Trump’s 80th birthday.

Recommended Videos

According to Politico, the lawsuit argues that the Trump administration’s authorization of the event is unlawful. Specifically, the filing claims that the approval violates National Park Service regulations that prohibit sporting events on federal parklands. Furthermore, the plaintiffs contend that Congress did not consent to the massive arch overlooking the event space. It also notes that no environmental review was conducted before construction.

The event, officially titled UFC Freedom 250, is marketed as part of the nation’s 250th anniversary celebrations. The lawsuit explicitly states, “The event is neither ‘for the celebration of the 250th anniversary of American Independence’ nor, crucially, being ‘planned, organized, and executed’ by the federal government.” It alleges that the event is being held for the financial benefit of the UFC, Paramount, their advertisers, “and to celebrate the 80th anniversary of Donald Trump’s birth.”

The lawsuit claims that the event provides benefits never been given before

Per CBS, the lawsuit claims that “The president is giving [UFC chief executive Dana] White and his company what none have enjoyed before: unfettered access to the White House and Lincoln Memorial to stage a private, for-profit sports event, with all the promotional and branding opportunities that accompany such access.” 

Brendan Ballou, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, expressed his concerns about the project. “This is fundamentally a private, commercial, corrupt use of our most sacred national monuments for private gain,” Ballou said. “And that is what is motivating this lawsuit.”

In response, an administration official called the legal challenge “an obstructionist, baseless, and dilatory” attempt to prevent the president from hosting the event. The official maintained that the event is “no different than the various other White House-hosted events on the South Lawn and properly permitted events on the Ellipse and National Mall throughout the year.”

Esquire notes that historically, the South Lawn is considered the President’s backyard, where annual events like staff barbecues take place. It is also where the President welcomes visiting heads of state. Some presidents, like Obama, instituted temporary changes like converting the tennis court into a basketball court. 

For the UFC event, crews are erecting an octagon-shaped cage on the South Lawn. The site reportedly features a 92-foot-high lighting rig dubbed “The Claw” for its resemblance to a massive toy claw machine. The structure weighs 600 tons and looms over a 13-ton steel cage that dwarfs the White House. Esquire also noted that crews are using industrial matting to protect the ground. 

In a video shared on TikTok, Trump compared the UFC rig to the Eiffel Tower, noting that it was originally intended to be temporary but became a permanent landmark. “And, you know, we’re building something in front of the White House that’s quite attractive to a lot of people. It’s going to have the big UFC fight on June 14, and I’m looking at it—and maybe we’ll never, ever take it down.”

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta, an Obama appointee, who, according to Newsweek, has previously ruled against Donald Trump in several high-profile cases. Mehta has overseen litigation dating back to 2019 involving the president’s financial records, civil cases related to the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, and criminal cases involving some of the president’s closest allies. 

Specifically, Mehta is reported to have upheld a House Oversight Committee subpoena for the president’s financial records in 2019 and later rejected the his bid to dismiss lawsuits related to the January 6 attack under claims of absolute immunity. 

The fight card features a championship unification match between Ilia Topuria and Justin Gaethje, along with an interim heavyweight bout between Alex Pereira and Ciryl Gane. In terms of fighter engagement, when Trump announced the event, UFC flyweight champion Brandon Royval criticized the event as ‘The Hunger Games’ for billionaires, and refused to be used as a gladiator.

Since the UFC event is slated for June 14, any request for an injunction to pause or block the proceedings will likely be handled on an expedited basis.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.