Dream A Little Bigger: A Guide To Understanding Inception

Inception production still 13 Dream A Little Bigger: A Guide To Understanding Inception

Inception is completely mind bending, there’s no doubt about it. When it comes down to it there really is no way to figure out the film. No matter what explanation you come up with for the film there will always be evidence to contradict it.

Every theory and idea as to what went on in the film has at least a couple plot holes. That being said, there are a few things that have been made clear. A few concepts, burning questions and theories have recently had some light shed on them. After seeing the movie twice, I now feel that I have a pretty good grasp on what happened and I think I can explain a fair bit about what really went on. So without further ado, here it is, Dream A Little Bigger: A Guide To Understanding Inception. Be warned, there are spoilers in this article.

1. What was up with the train on the street?

The explanation for the freight train that came crashing through the street can be one of two things. Firstly, some people like to think it came from Fischer. Fischer, being the important person that he is, has had his mind trained to defend itself from people like Cobb. This is why the team has such a tough time to begin with. Fischer’s subconscious is trying to protect itself from the extractors, hence the fact that the team is constantly being chased. The train is simply just another safeguard that is trying to deter the team from their goal.

Another explanation that people tend to think is that it came from Cobb’s subconscious, aka Mal. The train was the same one that took Cobb and Mal out of their dream world so it could be that Cobb unintentionally brought the train into the dream.

2. How does one wake up from a dream?

The bottom line on waking up from dreams is as follows. There are only 4 ways one can escape from a dream. To wake up, you must either receive a kick, the timer on the machine must run out, you must die in the dream or the sedative must wear off. That is the only way to wake up from a dream when you are hooked up to one of those machines.

3. Why is Saito so much older than Cobb when Cobb visits him in limbo?

The reason that Saito appears to be so much older than Cobb when they are in limbo is because of the time. Saito entered limbo before Cobb and due to the fact that time moves differently in limbo, this means that although Saito only entered limbo a short time before Cobb did, he will still appear much older since time moves at a different rate depending on how far down you are.

Although it doesn’t look it, the script says that Cobb has also aged slightly when he goes to visit Saito. Cobb technically spent years looking for Saito in limbo. This is why he looks so dazed and confused when he finally finds Saito. He is only able to remember Saito’s name at first, but after talking with Saito, the two start to remember everything.

Click below to continue reading.

Next
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….In the eighth question you said that " One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level.."How is that possible?How can the same action yield two different results?I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.—Manit

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) "This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same."Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end. Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by. So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.@Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says "Saito must be dead by now." My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend "years" in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

    • somy

      Could be possible. Ariadne – the spider, spinning Cobb – the webb lol.

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • Manithirani

    hey,

    really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….

    In the eighth question you said that ” One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level..”

    How is that possible?

    How can the same action yield two different results?

    I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.
    —Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,

    really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….

    In the eighth question you said that ” One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level..”

    How is that possible?

    How can the same action yield two different results?

    I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.
    —Manit

  • Manithirani

    hey,

    really good summary. But, I find a few inconsistencies….

    In the eighth question you said that ” One theory is that Saito shot himself and Cobb to get back to the real world..Another theory is that Saito shot Cobb which sent him to an even deeper level..”

    How is that possible?

    How can the same action yield two different results?

    I, too, am inclined towards the interpretation that just the end is a dream, ie, Cobb never got out of limbo.
    —Manit

  • Yeng

    12D) “This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same.”

    Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end.

    Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by.

    So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) “This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same.”

    Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end.

    Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by.

    So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Yeng

    12D) “This theory calls into question the very very end. When Cobb returns home his kids are in the same spot and are wearing the same clothes. Another thing to point out is that the kids haven’t aged at all either, they look the exact same.”

    Actually if you watch it carefully, the kids are in different clothes. It looks alike but I thin its different at the end.

    Also we can't make the argument that the kids are the same age BECAUSE Cobb and the other and the grandpa are also the same age. Perhaps it can be just mere months that passed by.

    So this theory that Cobb is in reality fits real well..

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.

    @Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.

    @Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Matt

    @Yeng I didn't notice that, I thought it was the same clothes, so did most people. And you don't know if Cobb and Miles are the same age, it's harder to tell if there older than it is for the kids. If a kid that young grows a year it is far more noticeable than if a grown man goes from 35 to 36.

    @Manithirani that is what I'm saying, there are so many contradictions with the theories. You can choose to beleive one or the other, you can't choose to believe both since they contradict each other.

  • Guest

    it bothers me that none of this speculating and theorizing has anything to do with the characters' motivations and conflicts or the themes of the story. this movie is completely overwhelming in its contrivances, which really takes a lot away from the bits of humanity and broader themes within the story.

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Julie

    Thanks…I enjoyed reading this and it gave me a lot of clarity.!

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says “Saito must be dead by now.”

    My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend “years” in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says “Saito must be dead by now.”

    My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend “years” in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Benjamin

    3) Saito didn't enter Limbo before Cobb. Cobb goes down with Ariadne while Eames is setting charges and Saito is fending off projections in Level 4. Cobb later says “Saito must be dead by now.”

    My theory about the age is that while both Cobb and Saito spend “years” in Limbo, Cobb has already been there and knows how to control Limbo, so can keep himself at the younger age, while Saito has no experience even architecting dreams to a single level, so ages in his Limbo as his real self would expect to.

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • Robston

    Many thanks. Nicely written and very useful.

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • http://twitter.com/TylerDaVideoGuy Tyler Mann

    12c is what I came up after seeing the movie, save for one vital idea that you are missing: Ariadne is MAL in real life. She is alive, was right about still being in a dream, and is leading the inception on Cobb. Think about it…who was the only one to get close to him? Why was she so horrified at Cobb's projection of dream Mal? Why was she the such a fast learner? The answer is because she is an architect and FORGER. Mal is able to change her appearance just like Eames. She is the only one to accompany Cobb down into his subconcious (because she has been there before!).And one last thing…who introduced Cobb to Ariadne? His FATHER. How convenient…

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it? The movie explains that you need a "kick" in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever. Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to "prime" the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Amy S

    I am confused about part of the movie. It shows that Cobb and Mal grew old together, but when it showed them being run over by the train to wake up, they were young. Do you think this is an error?

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place. But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • JT

    You stole the “5 Levels Of Inception” image from CinemaBlend.com and you do not have our permission to repurpose it and use it as your own.

    Please remove it immediately.

    Original image which you stole can be found here:
    http://www.cinemablend.com/new/An-Illustrated-Guide-To-The-5-Levels-Of-Inception-19643.html

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it?

    The movie explains that you need a “kick” in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.

    So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.

    Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever.

    Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to “prime” the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it?

    The movie explains that you need a “kick” in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.

    So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.

    Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever.

    Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to “prime” the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • Noesis

    Why couldn't Dom have killed Mal, with perhaps a gunshot to the head from a rooftop so she wouldn't even know it was he who did it, instead of performing inception on her? Or why couldn't he simply tie her down to the train-track? Or put an atomic bomb inside one of their buildings, detonating it while they were in it?

    The movie explains that you need a “kick” in order to wake up from a dream while heavily sedated, especially if you're in a low level, because the amount of time it would take for the timer to run out would be decades or centuries, and your brain would have become a pudding from the intense processing of cramming several lifetimes into about 10 hours. Since Dom and Mal wake up for a train running over their skulls, I'm going to assume this isn't a kick. Even if it was, Dom could have had Mal sit in a chair while in limbo ,and lean back while he knocked it from under her.

    So assuming the train-crushing was a kick, it's easy to imagine that Dom could have put Mal in numerous kick-causing situations without doing inception on her.

    Likewise, if it wasn't a kick, and all they needed to do was die (so that means they hadn't taken a sedative) Dom should have just killed Mal in the dream, in any way necessary. Bomb, Gun, Poison, whatever.

    Also, if they were already in limbo, how could Dom have performed inception on Mal? Inception seems to require going through many levels of dream-states and using clever emotional and imaginative tricks on each level to “prime” the person to believe the idea originated in their own mind?

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?
    I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?
    I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?
    I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • Dennis

    13. If Fischer was killed when he was shot, and they were able to resuscitate him, why couldn’t they save Saito the same way?
    I think Fischer wasn't completely dead yet, so if they rushed quickly enough they could kick him out from a deeper level where he would still be alive (due to time moving slower).

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.

    Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…

    I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.

    Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…

    I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.

    Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…

    I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • RJ

    Excellent! Thanks for spending so much time on this and for sharing your thoughts.

    Tyler Mann's comment is very interesting…

    I think people are going to be speculating about this film for a LONG time!

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place.

    But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.

    And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place.

    But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.

    And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place.

    But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.

    And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • Kosha

    Nice work… lots of thing at one place.

    But I don't agree with your explanation of 12e). I believe that Cobb wakes up and meets his kids. One thing to point out is, the kids clothes are similar looking but different, if seen closely. Also the kids have actually aged slightly. If you see the cast, you can see two sets of children of slightly different ages. So, Nolan has given very subtle clues, which are not obvious to everyone.

    And I don't agree to 15 either. If you see Nolan's previous movies, they are like a puzzle, but he will leave enough clues in the movie for you to deduce the correct answer. His puzzles always have a definitive single answer.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • http://twitter.com/najmiyusoff najmiyusoff

    The 5 levels of inception chart is inconsistent with the explanation you give in the paragraphs above and below it. in the image chart level one start at reality, while in the explanation you identified the van chase as level one. look it up and change it to avoid further confusions. you're welcome.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Jhtheking

    3.) He hasn't spent years searching for him.. he wakes up on the beach just as he has previously when entering limbo. The reason Saito is so old is that he dies in the first level, and then later Cobb drowns in the first level when he doesn't wake up (if you watch the movie closely, Arthur checks on Cobb when he wakes up to the first dream, and then he and Ariadne breathe oxygen via the equipment at hand). The short amount of time between Saito's and Cobb's death in level one was several decades in Limbo, so Saito was old.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick. A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at). The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here). The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Vic

    In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids.

  • Matt

    For some reason I am unable to edit the post, I try to remove the picture and update it but it won't update. It could have something to do with our server as we just moved servers last night

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic"In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the "whole thing was a dream" scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me. http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in…..

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick.

    A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at).

    The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here).

    The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick.

    A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at).

    The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here).

    The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • J1

    I think you're mixing up dying in a dream and getting a kick. A kick comes from a higher level. IT occurs when you're dreaming (as in Cobb dreaming at the beginning of the movie while sitting in the chair above the bath tub) and you're body is subjected to a change in equilibrium that wakes you up (as in Cobb's chair being pushed over and waking him from a lower level dream). Think about if you fell asleep in a chair at home. Your friend pushes the chair over – before it falls you're going to wake up. Your friend, in effect, gave you a kick.

    A kick comes from a level above. DEATH, on the other hand (at least in levels 1 and 2) just results in you waking up, b/c the mind can't process its own death, presumably. Killing oneself is not giving onself a kick, just like killing Mal wouldn't be Cobb giving her a kick. It simply results in death, and that takes you up a level (or back to reality, depending on the level you're already at).

    The problem with LIMBO is that it tends to make people forget that they are in a dream. They may also be so deeply into their subconscious that a kick from reality may not reach them, or death may result in coma or simply a lower level of limbo. (All speculation here).

    The point, though, is that a kick and death-in-a-dream are too very different things.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the “whole thing was a dream” scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me.

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the “whole thing was a dream” scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me.

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the “whole thing was a dream” scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me.

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in

  • zer0ed77

    Honestly, I am a huge Nolan fan. I am not a fan of the “whole thing was a dream” scenario. In fact, upon second viewing, before I started reading online opinions, I believed I had the whole film figured out. It is to be taken at face value. When Memento came out, so many people believed the film to not hold any answers to its end. Nolan made it clear the answers are in the film and that he would NEVER do an open ended film left to conjecture. Rather than I argue the point that the film is NOT a dream, I'll let one of the films stars do it for me.

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/07/in

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic

    “In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic

    “In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic

    “In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Me

    I agree 100% with Vic

    “In the end it didn't matter if he was dreaming – he walked away from the top indicating he didn't care as long as he could be with his kids'.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Bob

    The same action can yield two different results depending on the circumstances. If the sedative was still active/active enough(?), shooting Cobb would have sent him deeper into limbo.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    I think they just showed them young when Cobb was telling Ariadne what happened. Later, I believe they showed elderly Mal and Cobb holding hands the same way young Mal and Cobb did while on the train tracks, presumably signifying that it was elderly Mal and Cobb who were actually on the tracks.

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • Blue

    To answer question 1: Didn't Ariadne blame Cobb for the freight train?

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • zer0ed77

    Yes.

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • austin

    the totem does determine whether your in reality or a dream…. it only determines whether or not you're in someone else's dream

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • Austin

    totem doesn't *

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • johnkimble

    Who cares – 2001 is hardly memorable for its characters (except HAL I suppose).

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..
    A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..
    A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..
    A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • kokhsien

    I don't agree with some of your points..
    A better explanation is at http://kokhsien.blogspot.com

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Tippo

    You forgot to mention the anniversary scene why was Mal on the opposite ledge from the hotel window? I found that to be strange and it queries me to believe that he possibly was never married.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.The ONE character that I have yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

    • Gia

      Very good insight.

    • Michael

      Did you notice how long Cobb was gone for? Did you also notice that Cobb’s KIDS NEVER AGED!!!!?

      • Phaedrus

        Watch the credits. The children’s character’s are played by two sets of actors, and the character’s ages are two years apart (James at 20 months and 3 years, Phillipa at 3 years and 5 years). This supports the theory that the children at the end are Cobb’s children in “reality”.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carroz

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the "right one".I am going to go with a combination of:12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally. The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it. It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is "Grandpa" in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw "3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane." He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of "Inception" itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there. This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.Best Original ScreenplayBest DirectorBest Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this timeBest CinematographyBest Sound EditingBest Film EditingBest PictureI just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.To everyone else, take my "take" on this movie, and go back and watch it again.Done. Peace.

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    "if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?"1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Louis Stephen Carrozzi

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the “right one”.

    I am going to go with a combination of:

    12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and
    12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.

    However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally.

    The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is “Grandpa” in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw “3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane.” He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of “Inception” itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.

    It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there.

    This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.

    The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.

    If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.

    Best Original Screenplay
    Best Director
    Best Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this time
    Best Cinematography
    Best Sound Editing
    Best Film Editing
    Best Picture

    I just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'

    Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.

    To everyone else, take my “take” on this movie, and go back and watch it again.

    Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carrozzi

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the “right one”.

    I am going to go with a combination of:

    12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and
    12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.

    However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally.

    The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is “Grandpa” in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw “3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane.” He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of “Inception” itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.

    It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there.

    This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.

    The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.

    If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.

    Best Original Screenplay
    Best Director
    Best Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this time
    Best Cinematography
    Best Sound Editing
    Best Film Editing
    Best Picture

    I just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'

    Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.

    To everyone else, take my “take” on this movie, and go back and watch it again.

    Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carrozzi

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the “right one”.

    I am going to go with a combination of:

    12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and
    12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.

    However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally.

    The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is “Grandpa” in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw “3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane.” He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of “Inception” itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.

    It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there.

    This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.

    The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.

    If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.

    Best Original Screenplay
    Best Director
    Best Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this time
    Best Cinematography
    Best Sound Editing
    Best Film Editing
    Best Picture

    I just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'

    Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.

    To everyone else, take my “take” on this movie, and go back and watch it again.

    Done. Peace.

  • Louis Stephen Carrozzi

    Excellent! I agree with all of your points, but I think there is WAY more to this movie, and I think my interpretation is the “right one”.

    I am going to go with a combination of:

    12d) The Inception was on us the audience and was done by Christopher Nolan and
    12a) Nothing Ever Happened. All of it was just Cobb's dream on the plane.

    However, if you stop there, you are missing out – emotionally.

    The ONE character that I has yet to fully figure out is Mal, but I think I have FINALLY got it.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that if Michael Caine is “Grandpa” in real life (and not a professor) then he's taking care of the kids and Mal is dead. Yes, Cobb and Mal were supposed to grow old together, but she killed herself, and the fact that there was nothing Cobb could do to stop it is where all of his guilt comes from. In the dream world in Limbo, on level 5 they had 50 years together and they did grow old – just like Saito had – but that was only a projection of Cobb in a dream. He wanted to grow old with her. He wanted to build a life with her. He wanted to die with her at the end. He would have put himself on the train tracks with her and killed himself if he thought it could have saved her. He would have died for her, but in the end there was nothing he could do. But because of what happened, now he never can be with her. When he sees her in the end, he has to let her go because no matter how hard he tries, his vision of her in his dreams could never actually replace her. He even says in the dream that she saw “3 psychiatrists and all of them said she was sane.” He is angry about the fact that they were wrong. The movie says that you should never create dreams from your memory or you will lose all sense of reality and will be unable to tell if you are dreaming. The ONE and ONLY scene with Mal in the movie that is real is the night with a smashed up hotel room and her jumping from the building. Even the idea of “Inception” itself was never Cobb planting an idea in her head. It was her going insane and the last words she said to Cobb before she killed herself planted the idea of Inception in HIS mind which is where everything else in the movie comes from. Everything else, the beach, the shared dreaming, the Inception, the train tracks, the train, all that was just projections of Cobb's mind playing tricks on him simply because in real life he would have died for her on the train tracks. Cobb is having a terrible time getting over her which is why he is afraid to look at his child's faces. If he sees them, he knows he is in the real world, and that Mal is gone forever.

    It took me 2 times seeing the movie and a hell of a lot of thinking and I had to go through as many theories about the movie as everyone else until I finally really asked what Mal was really doing there.

    This is a love story about a man who lost his wife to a mental illness and about his love for his kids.

    The second time I saw it, I cried at the end. For people who say that this movie doesn't have any characters that we can care about or any emotional impact just simply don't get it, in my opinion. This is easily one of the best movies I have ever seen, and it might just be #1 on my list of all time.

    If The Academy passes on 'Inception' because they think it is a movie about a team of people trying to plant an illegal thought into a rich man's mind, not only do they NOT get it, but they will be missing out on one of the best movies of all time.

    Best Original Screenplay
    Best Director
    Best Actor (Leonardo Di Caprio) he absolutely should get it this time
    Best Cinematography
    Best Sound Editing
    Best Film Editing
    Best Picture

    I just can't imagine anything else that's going to come out this year that's going to be better than 'Inception.'

    Christopher Nolan: Good luck and thank you for making me believe in movies again.

    To everyone else, take my “take” on this movie, and go back and watch it again.

    Done. Peace.

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :) 2 books: Yog VashishtEnoch

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either… You have to ask…WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF "ALL" THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Duki

    There is one point you're missing. The spinning top at the end, it indicates he is stuck in the dream, therefore if your theory holds true, Araidne failed. And also, what is Ariadne trying to accomplish if Mal is still alive?

  • Marc

    “if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?”

    1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)

    2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    “if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?”

    1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)

    2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    “if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?”

    1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)

    2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Marc

    “if it is reality then why are the kids wearing the same thing and why do they look the same age?”

    1) The girl is older. Longer hair, taller, and her features are much more that of a 7-year-old than the toddler in the flashbacks. Her dress is also different (white sleeves)

    2) The shirt the boy is wearing in the ending is different than in the flashbacks. The shirt in the flashbacks appears to be red plaid, whereas in the ending, it is more white plaid. His hair is also slightly longer.

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :)
    2 books:
    Yog Vashisht
    Enoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :)
    2 books:
    Yog Vashisht
    Enoch

  • Xxx

    To analyze it in linear mathematical terms is… incomplete. :)
    2 books:
    Yog Vashisht
    Enoch

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    No one can look past a choice they do not understand, No one. – Oracle. Matrix 2

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either…
    You have to ask…
    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF “ALL” THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either…
    You have to ask…
    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF “ALL” THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    If you did not get Matrix 2 & 3 and love the movies.. The evolution of your consciousness cannot grasp this either…
    You have to ask…
    WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF “ALL” THOUGHT?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Xxx

    How can you tell the REAL WORLD.. from the DREAM WORLD..?

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said "LAM" on it. "Mal" in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • Rooster

    I think the article above actually does a good job of explaining this one. Limbo is not so much a place (or dream level) as it is a state of mind. If you've gone deep enough, you COULD lose yourself and forget that you're dreaming. Once you believe your dream is real, limbo reflects your version of reality. Mal believed she was in reality for what felt like 50 years. So, naturally, she grew old with her husband. Saito believed he was in reality for what felt like decades as well. So, naturally, he aged as he feared… old and alone in his chamber. But Cobb, with his sharp grip on the nature of dreaming, was able to keep his grasp in both instances… mostly. With Mal, Cobb knew they were still in a dream. He stayed down there to experiment and to build a world like gods. Since he knew it was all a dream, neither of them would age FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE. With Saito, you could tell Cobb was starting to lose his grip. In fact, he did seem pretty haggard. But he likely wasn't in limbo as long as Saito, he kept his mind focused in order to hunt down Saito, and, of course, he understood the dream world much better than Saito.

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said “LAM” on it. “Mal” in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said “LAM” on it. “Mal” in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • Inceptor

    Ahh, EVERYBODY missed the Limo driver sign that said “LAM” on it. “Mal” in reverse. Could this be Mal's dream?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.

    You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.

    You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • sneppo

    I don't get how they can use a machine to go into limbo.

    You only go into limbo through dying, so that means it was just Cobbs dream they went into. When he died in the dream, he went to the real limbo and met Saito…. Any thoughts?

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Soraai

    The kids did age, thus the different sets of actors. Do your research (in this case checking the casting on imdb would have been enough).

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.This is what I think:I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him "why dont you come to reality?" Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo. And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and childrenThe wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there "to be awaken" as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: "There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream."totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.

    This is what I think:

    I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?

    So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him “why dont you come to reality?” Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?

    Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.

    What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo.

    And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and children

    The wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.

    During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.

    This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there “to be awaken” as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.

    But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: “There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream.”

    totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.

    This is what I think:

    I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?

    So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him “why dont you come to reality?” Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?

    Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.

    What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo.

    And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and children

    The wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.

    During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.

    This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there “to be awaken” as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.

    But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: “There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream.”

    totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie Boehler

    Thanks, I have really liked the movie and your interpretations are very interested.

    This is what I think:

    I think that the the job with Fisher is a distraction for him like the blond girl is a distraction for Fisher. He does not do one job but two. First he tries with Seito but fails because the architecture of the dream was not good enough. Who is attaacked in this dream when there is the violent stike? The architect which means that the people attacks him in order to defend the subject. Why the subject could not be Cobb already and not Seito?

    So he decides to find a new architect. When he goes to Paris isn´t strange that his father in law already tells him “why dont you come to reality?” Why would it say such a think if Cobb was already awake?

    Then he decides to do the job with Fisher and he knows that he will have to face the projections of his own mind (which means his ex wife) since both Fischer and him will be asleep and thus in the dream.That is why he needs the architect to know the maze of the dream but does not want to know it.

    What is important about the dreams is that if you are in one level dream, you can wake up easily or if you die in this one level dream then you can wake up. But the thing is that if you die in one dream with different levels, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains trapped in the bottom level. That is why when Seito died in the dream, he went to the bottom level and that is precisely the reason why the movie starts with Cobb on the beach: in fact he is in the bottom level looking for the guy as when they stared the job and he got shoot, he promised him to come and get him in Limbo.

    And it is what happened with his wife as well: he created for her the perfect dream and this dream was at the edge of subconscious, where everything was deep and perfect. Then he realized that this was not reality and he wanted to return to reality. That is why they decided to kill themselves under the train. After killing themselves, they got back to what they thought was reality but in fact it was not! It was still an other dream. I think so because of the reason that if you want to have access to the deepest dream, you have to pass by different other level of dream before. So when they woke up there are still in a dream: Cobbe´s dream of having a house and children

    The wife feels that something is not right and that is why she always thinks about killing herself: by killing herself she knows that she will return to the bottom level dream. Why? Precisely because if you die in one of the other level, it is not possible for you to wake up: your mind remains in the bottom level for ever. So she kills herself by the window and then Cobb decides to go to get her. They live a second time in limdo and this time they grow old together. If you remember this scene when she tells him that he gave up on their dram which was to get old together, then he answers that they did get old together and that she died but she could not remember.

    During the whole movie he cannot accept that she died that is why he keeps projecting her when he does a job in someone else’s mind. He keeps and he wants to keep imagining that he can still be with her. But after doing that last job, he realizes that it is not true: he cannot search for her in dreams for ever and he has to admit to himself that if she died it is because of him: because he was the one putting in HER mind the idea of an eternal dream. That is the moment when he tells to her that what he feels is guiltiness. Once he admit that he feels guilty then he can free himself from her.

    This end is of course ambiguous but according to me he does not decide to go back to reality but to the dream: he chooses the dream with his Children. The reality with his children is still a dream. In my opinion, all the scenes with the wife and the children are part of his dream. I think that at the end he accepts that his wife died but still chooses not to live in reality but in this dream where the wife is dead and where he is a father and must take care of his children. Exactly like these people in the abasement who chooses to live in their dream and come there “to be awaken” as the old man says. according to me that is why the totem is still spinning at the end.

    But maybe he does not chooses, maybe he does not have the choice as it is brightly explain in interpretation f: “There is simply no way for Cobb or Saito to return to the plane since they both died while sedated. The very end is just a projection that Cobb created so he could be happy and at peace. By killing Cobb, Saito did complete his end of the deal, Cobb was able to return home to his kids, even if it was in a dream.”

    totems help to have a small idea of what is real and what is not but i think we also need to look at the yellow filter used. For me, when there is a yellow hue it is a dream…

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • Nathalie

    But what about COBOL??? isn´t the key word of the movie?

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • lakshmi

    ty for this….as a person who doesnt normally watch thrillers, i dint understand the movie properly and got distracted by other things…….and i loved ur 5 levels chart!!!

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's "real world" level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his "real world" is still several levels deep.Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many "holes" in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his "real world" level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-) "But the top DID stop spinning in one scene"… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Sheila

    12n: Cobb is still in his dream. Mal was right all along. Mal was the first to forget reality so Cobb did the inception on her. Cobb's “real world” level was still actually a dream several levels down. Perhaps Mal has already arrived in the Real World and tries to wake up Cobb but to Cobb, he'll wake up several years later since his “real world” is still several levels deep.

    Remember what Mal said in Limbo towards the end? That there are so many “holes” in his real world starting with this mystery organisation chasing him, etc. etc..?

    It's also possible that Cobb is trying to reconcile the pain of his “real world” level before going another level up closer to reality. It makes sense if after him seeing the kids he goes back to the desk and sees the top still spinning… of course we'll never know… Unless the sequel starts with Cobb looking at the top still spinning! ;-)

    “But the top DID stop spinning in one scene”… I don't think so since he kinda interrupted the top from spinning, IIRC…

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Johanliebert

    About 13, wouldn't the crashing of the other levels that you mentioned in 12E also apply? I.e., if there are no other levels between Saito's death – wherever it takes place – and the plane, he would wake up in reality by default?

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.This is my explanation to what happens:1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Amirmishali

    I have two problems with most of the theories:

    1. When Cobb finally meets his kids, they look exactly the same like in his dreams, including their position and clothes. This proves that Cobb is still im a dream, but which dream is it?

    2. When Cobb and Ariadne are in level 3, Fischer dies. Then whose conciousness do they enter next? It can't be Fischer's. It seems to be Cobb's. But how can that be? How can they enter Cobb's dream from Fischer's? The only reasonable explanation is that they were in Cobb's dream all along.

    This is my explanation to what happens:
    1. Cobb and Mal create a dream world of their own and enter Limbo.
    2. Cobb understands they are still in Limbo and convinces MAl to commit suicide together.
    3. This fails to wake them up, and they get stuck at some other state of dreaming, still in Limbo.
    4. Mal understands them and commits suicide again, probably waking up, and leaving Cobb in Limbo.
    5. Either Cobb tries to wake himself up, or someone (Mal?) tries to create inception, convincing Cobb he's still dreaming, but fails.
    6. Cobb stays in Limbo, but in a drean world he can still see his kids.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Laktor

    This is good, but when you say Cobb had to perform inception on Mal, I don't know what inception is. I could never figure that out in the film. And how can someone enjoy the film if there are so many scenes that you can't figure out what is happening? For me, from the point where Fischer is in the hotel lobby and Cobb comes up to talk with him….from then on, I did not understand anything that was happening. So the actions scenes were pretty well rendered meaningless as well as Cobb and Mal's big scene at the end. I had no idea what that was about.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Suestonto

    Everything is a dream. From start to finish, every scene is a dream.a. Mel is right, Cob is still stuck in Limbo (or in a dream), they never got back from their experiments (or alternatively even pre-experiment they were in a dream)Death will only result in going to a deeper dream level. You get confused in that dream level thinking it's real. That's what limbo means.Cobb and Mal went to deep dream level. The time in real life is very slow. After 50 yr in one of the level, they decide to kill themselves, each got thrown into a deeper level. Since they did not use the machine, the Mal who was supposed to be in real life, is actually imagined by Cobb. Cobb imagined the entire movie. Each time he uses the machine, he goes even deeper. (There's a total of 4 times). Then he died again in level 4. He gets to send into a deeper level in which he is now totally confused (in limbo state). He and Saito decided to kill themselves. Cobb goes into another deeper level. This time he is completely unaware he is still in the dream.After so many levels of dream, the time in real life literally paused. Where is Cobb? He is actually in his house next to Mal.Major evidence:Mal sitting on the other building when she committed suicide.- it is not logical, therefore it's not reality.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Fofl

    My explanation as well.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theoryThere's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • Suestonto

    Gotta add something to this Cobb and Mal in limbo theory

    There's no pool Limbo. Mal and Cobb did not get together after they commit the suicide. Why? Dream Machine is the only thing that enable a person to enter another person's dream. Both Cobb and Mal did not use the machine to get into a new level. Cobb is in limbo after the suicide. In this case, Cobb is dreaming of this place he subconsciously wanted, his home with his wife and children. He was also very concern about his wife's mental health. He started to dream of his wife wanting to commit suicide. Mal in that reality isn't real. Cobb's perception of his wife is rather fixed. Mal is always maniac and suicidal. The Mal from the reality Cobb believed in has the same personality as every Mal in the dream levels. The real Mal wasn't with Cobb in the reality level.

    Similarly, Cobb and Saito limbo isn't really a shared limbo. Saito is not actually there.

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • TJ

    It's (almost?) all a dream: Cobb can see his kids in the real world any time if that is what he wanted. He can use Skype or just fly them to France (for example)… So: not by doing the obvious: Cobb must be dreaming then…

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • Danny12

    The final is pure and simple … we are all in a dream (NOW in this present ) . This is what Nolan , is telling us , even if you wake up we are still dreaming because even this physical world is not real . We are pure consciousness , that is all we are , so we live in a dream . Call this crazy or whatever you like , if you do not believe this fact study Dr . Amit Goswami .This movie has a lot of things you can understand and reflect about our own lives .

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • TJ

    He is dreaming: he can see his kids in the real world anytime if that is what he wanted. He can use skype or just fly them to France… So get over it…

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Pffft

    or it could just be that he was waiting for an asian person.

  • Cool_cool_kit

    i watched it twice also but i think you most got all the points, but there is one very funny thing i havn't seen anyone pointing out and that is when saito came back to the bullet train and looked across the young man reading and laughed. I think it is because, the young man read the comic manga UPSIDE DOWN!! And I think saito believes some of them did a poor job even in reality. :)

  • Guy72277

    They grew old together in their dream world, but when they decided to return to reality by putting their heads on the train tracks, they were young. Were they in a different dream levels when they grew old and when they committed suicide?

  • Guest

    The reason for this is because you can not truly physically age in limbo, for it is a dream. This is why onceMal and Cobb realize they are in limbo and set themselves up in front of the train they look young, for once they realize they are dreaming they shed the illusion of old age. Just like everything else in a dream, age/appearance can be altered at will.

  • Wishmaster

    Grandpa is in Europe, Cobb is in Europe, children are not.
    How come the only way to see his children is going to USA?
    He is stuck in a dreamworld be it limbo or level 1000 does not matter.
    Period.

  • http://twitter.com/kiana_mylove Kiana Choi Ka Yan

    This is a great article that can explain my plentiful questions about Inception. Although i don’t want to admit, i believe that he is still dreaming at the end. T~T

  • http://twitter.com/kiana_mylove Kiana Choi Ka Yan

    Tis is a great article that can explain my plentiful questions about Inception. Although i don't want to admit, i believe that he is still dreaming at the end. T~T

  • http://www.parkesweb.com/ Steve P

    Good article.

    Sorry if this has been pointed out already, but I haven’t read through all the comments.

    The kids were certainly NOT in the same clothes at the end, although they were similar enough that it’s understandble people think so. Obviously Nolan wouldn’t have made them so similar, but not the same, by chance. He wanted at least some of the audience to think this – it’s kind of his inception on the audience.

    Many people have commented that they did not find that the kids were in exactly the same position. Again, it was similar: they were playing together in a sunlit backyard. But not the same.

    The ages are hard to judge, given how little you see of them in the scenes before the end. So, given that these things are not ‘exactly the same’ as often gets stated, and at least one thing (the clothes) are definitely different, Given that this part with the children is the main object to “12e” interpretation, these points leaves 12e as the most likely option.

  • http://twitter.com/CoyAlpaca CoyAlpaca

    who knows the opera songs during the count down moment

  • PMG

    The answer is simple….

    This is just a movie, written with an ending that makes no sense so that people can’t figure it out and keep talking about it.

    Nothing more to it than that. There is no 12a, 12c, this or that theory, it`s just movie deliberately written to be ambiguous so that you keep thinking and talking about it.

  • Jimmy

    alot of good points here. yes there will never be any definative answer, however i think we can rule out 12a as when cobb wakes up and looks at saito, saito instantly picks up the phone. This would be too much of a coincidence otherwise. 12a would also ruin the film.

  • Rsv7388

    there are some doubts I have regarding inception. Can you help me solving them.
    http://rsvblogger.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/inception-doubts/

  • Claude

    Just saw Inception for the first time. Great movie. Then I read this article and I gotta say, I think you guys are all over-thinking this one. But there is a lot going on, so please forgive me if I say anything that is clearly wrong, but I think I grasped everything quite well. My biggest issue lies in this question:

    What really happened at the end?

    I find 12B to be intriguing but let’s leave this at 2 options for now. It’s either real or it’s a dream.

    I find it interesting that nobody has mentioned some key facts here such as: DiCaprio throughout the movie is constantly being driven by the same haunted image of his kids. He is filled with regret that he doesn’t see their faces that “last time”. Also throughout we see his kids showing up in his missions during the dreams, basically distracting him. Translation – He doesn’t care whether the totem stops spinning or not because he doesn’t want to miss his kids faces.
    Next fact – When in a dream, the subconscious has a way of letting you know or warning you that you are in fact in a dream. One of these ways is that people unrelated to your dream, in essence the extras of the dream, will start to look at you or whatever is out of place. This in essence, let’s you know that you are in dreamworld. Well, what I instantly noticed is that this begins to happen as he walks through the airport, I believe after he passes customs. Everyone starts to look at him, and it seemed to me that he noticed for a split second but disregarded it or something changed which caused the people to stop looking. Maybe I just imagined this.
    Then there is also the fact that the events of this movie, as it seemed to me, all occur very quickly. 50 years of limbo occur throughout a ten hour plane ride. So it seems inconceivable to me that Michael Caine would be in Paris or wherever the hell they were, and then suddenly be in the USA to pick him up. So Caine being there to me is an instant clue that this in fact is a dream. Plus Caine seemed to be his pops, not the wife’s. After all, she was presumed murdered. If Caine were the wife’s father, I doubt he would still be on speaking terms with his wife’s murderer.
    So we get to the final scene. Thing is spinning, and it looks like it could keep going on spinning, thus signifying he is still dreaming, but it also looks like it is beginning to get a little wobbly, and it may in fact stop but he is too distracted by his children to care or notice. Either way, we don’t truly get to find out because it jumps to the credits, thus letting us come up with our own conclusions. But though it may look like it could stop, the fact is it doesn’t.
    This to me all adds up to: He is dreaming. He has now entered his own personal limbo, where he has finally found peace. Just my humble opinion, but what I can say for sure is, Great fucken movie.

  • Metro_man

    Not enough boobage in all levels.

  • Dalton

    This movie was alright except for the major glitch in the plot, in dream level 1, the van is in free fall (no gravity), which causes no gravity in level 2 (the hotel), so if there is no gravity in level 2 why is there gravity in level 3? it doesn’t make sense to me