Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

Part Three: Born in Darkness

The Dark Knight Rises in a Sociopolitical Context 

anne hathaway selina kyle catwoman the dark knight rises 507x360 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

Christopher Nolan has always had larger social issues in mind when crafting these films, and in many ways, his Dark Knight saga is just as rooted in broad sociopolitical theory as it is in character-based psychological deconstruction.

In Batman Begins, part of what compels Bruce Wayne to don the cowl is the idea that society itself is broken. As I wrote in “Why Do We Fall?”“That Gotham resembles recognizable American cities more and more with each passing film is no coincidence; the films are set in our world, and in Nolan’s view, our world is falling out beneath us. Criminals run the streets, officers look the other way, politicians act in their own self-interest, and though ordinary citizens pay the price time and time again, even they are not without blame. A profound apathy has settled over Gotham; so long as individuals avert their eyes and allow an increasingly flawed system to perpetuate itself, the destruction will continue unchecked.” This is a society so fundamentally unsound that, in Bruce’s view, the only way to affect meaningful change is to operate outside existing institutional parameters, hence the creation of Batman.

With that in mind, The Dark Knight Rises takes this essential underlying issue to the next level. If society itself has failed utterly, and cannot be repaired from the inside, is full-blown revolution justified?

The answer, of course, is no, as the film’s voice of revolution is Bane, who is not only unrepentantly evil, but also believes that Gotham is so far gone that not even a restructuring of society will save it; he only gives the people their revolution to torment them, to give the lower class a brief glimmer of hope before the nuclear device wipes them all out.

Nevertheless, the concept of revolution lies at the heart of the film. Bane’s methods are, of course, wicked and misguided on every level, and that may lead some to oversimplify their reading of the material. Bane’s rhetoric – about taking Gotham ‘back’ from the rich, power, and privileged to put it in the hands of ‘the people’ – undoubtedly echoes that of America’s ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests, and I am positive some conservative commentator will therefore read the film as a stern indictment of what they like to call ‘class warfare.’

They will be wrong. Nolan rejects Bane’s terrorist methods, but he does, at multiple junctures, give credence to the concept of desiring revolution. Bane is only able to manipulate the people of Gotham by preying on their primal urges, and for the masses, that involves the promise of leveling the playing field. It is not an unreasonable desire. As a stand-in for America at large, Gotham is beset by the same crippling economic problems affecting our nation’s middle and lower classes. Namely, issues of growing income inequality and a near total lack of social mobility have become too large to ignore, and while there are those would dismiss their importance, Nolan is not one of them.

Were he, Selina Kyle would not be interpreted as a sympathetic representation of the 99%, and Bruce Wayne would never have to confront the fact that he is exorbitantly wealthy in a time when many are struggling worse than ever before. Bruce is, of course, a good man who uses his wealth for largely selfless goals, while Selina is a burglar with a highly compromised moral compass. Yet both believe they do right by the contexts in which they were raised, and Nolan makes it clear that neither is entirely justified in their actions.

 Imagine The Fire: Analyzing The Dark Knight Rises

Selina comes from nothing, and presumably grew up in a social environment where having nothing made it harder and harder to live as time went by. Her solution – to steal her way through the world – is not ethically sound, but it is easy to imagine the right combination of desperation and outrage (not just over growing inequality, but increasing government preference towards the privileged) leading a person to see thievery as the only viable path, especially if those being thieved have more than enough to go around.

Selina’s actions are never condoned, but neither are they entirely condemned. Bruce probably could have retrieved his mother’s pearls in their first encounter if he desired, and it would be all too easy to give Selina’s location to the police right away. But even though he frowns upon her methods, Bruce does see legitimacy to the emotions that inspired such tactics. Instead of putting Selina away, Bruce tries redirecting her anger down more positive avenues.

Anger is, after all, key to Batman’s own creation. Fury over a world gone so terribly wrong is part of what compelled Bruce to become a masked vigilante, but to remain heroic, Bruce had to keep that anger in check, making sure it never consumed him. Selina is, in a sense, consumed; she is younger, and rougher around the edges, a raw force of passion capable of great deeds and significant harm. From the very beginning, she displays both a desire to give into baser instincts and ignite revolution, and a willingness to rise above her rage to find more constructive avenues of change. Bruce – and by extension, the film – nudges her down the constructive path, gradually correcting her methods while never rejecting her feelings.

This harmonious middle ground is, I imagine, where Nolan himself falls on modern social issues. The political problems Selina highlights are not to be ignored, nor should they be delegitimized, but reacting in the extreme, as Bane does, will never be the answer. Society is deeply, unequivocally flawed, but detonating modern culture and starting from scratch is not the solution.

Even then, if Nolan didn’t empathize with the outright rage that fuels Bane’s cause, Talia al Ghul would not be part of the story. If Bane continued to be the ultimate arbiter of Gotham’s destruction until the very end, we would lose perspective on the genuine fury behind Bane and the League’s actions. Bane, after all, is the way he is because that’s the role he plays in the world. What else is a man with a dark upbringing, horrible disfigurations, and a drive to destroy going to do?

But Talia is different. Talia is beautiful, smart, and charismatic; she could be anything, anything at all. That she sees destroying Gotham as the only way to do ‘good’ shows just how desperate she’s become, how desperate the world has become. That someone who should be the best of us would try doing something so horrible is deeply, profoundly disturbing. With Bane, or the Joker, or any other major series villain, the evil is expected; that’s the social, archetypical role they play. But Talia doesn’t have to be that, and this is why she’s interesting. More importantly, that’s why her betrayal is so stinging, to Bruce and the audience; her total lack of hope and destructive means to an end signals how far the world has sunk.

But again, giving into overwhelming anger is not the answer. The passion we feel over the world’s problems should be fueled into more positive, constructive outlets. If our broken institutions are to be fixed, meaningful change must be inspired on individual levels; we each have to find within ourselves the power to be better. That’s the point of a symbolic figure like Batman. He exists outside the social structure, but not to revolutionize or reconstruct that structure. As Bruce tells Gordon at the end of the film, the idea behind Batman is that he could be anybody; if someone extraordinary can rise from the ranks of the ordinary, then all shall, theoretically, be inspired to do better, and the system shall perhaps correct itself to help everybody, rather than a select few.

This is the solution The Dark Knight Rises, in its own bombastic way, posits. At the end of the film, Gotham is more broken than ever before, but Batman’s symbolic power has been restored and revitalized, the people have a police force they can believe in again, and both ordinary (John Blake) and extraordinary (Selina Kyle) citizens are starting to do their part to improve the world. Batman has proven that revolution is not the answer, and that there are viable, positive alternatives to craft a functional system.

Nolan’s message isn’t simple. It is not black-and-white, it is not politically partisan, and I wouldn’t even say it’s particularly optimistic. But it is, in its own way, inspiringly hopeful. Nolan suggests that we can stick to what our hearts tell us and rise above our worst instincts at the same time, and that in so doing, we may truly empower and improve the world around us.

Read ‘Part Four: The Fire Rises’ by continuing onto the next page…

PreviousNext
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Atomic Ross

    This is terrible. A painfully long, over-written jerkoff that offers no critical insight.

    And I liked the movie.

    • Anonymous

      I liked the part where he quoted himself and recommended that you read his other article.

    • Tracer Bullet

      Was just about to write pretty much the exact same comment…… The writer seems obsessed with using long, fanciful words that add nothing to the article which in itself isn’t up to much anyway.

  • serenityncc880

    I loved this article. So insightful and passionate. First worthy article I have seen for such a great film and Trilogy. I will be saving this on my computer. Thank you!!

  • Geoffrey Shauger

    Loved the movie…it’s my favorite of the 3 and is 2nd only to Inception on Nolan’s resume.

  • rks

    Did you like the movie though? I couldn’t tell from reading the article.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      I loved the movie. I think it’s an excellent conclusion to the franchise, and an impressive cinematic milestone.

  • http://twitter.com/maliu808 Maliu

    Thank you for this piece. Ever since seeing the movie, and blown away by the breadth of skill throughout, I couldn’t organize my thoughts. Much like you I loved it but am enamored with the Dark Knight. I do, however, think that this is one of the best ending to an intense & moving trilogy. And I can’t wait for the boxed set so that I can marathon the trilogy.

  • James Matlock

    Excellent article, very thoughtful and insightful and I agree with it 100%. The best review of this film!

  • Jon Buch

    Thank you for some great articles on the Batman triology. I’ve got a question for you. Which other films throughout history do you consider as epics? And how come you don’t consider TDK an epic

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      Obvious examples include “Lawrence of Arabia,” “Ben Hur,” “Seven Samurai,” and “2001: A Space Oddyssey.” Those are the ones that come immediately to mind. I think “Lord of the Rings” is clearly an epic as well.

      TDK is a great movie, one of the best ever made in my opinion, and better than TDKR. Not being an epic isn’t a bad thing. It just means its goals are different than that of an epic. TDK, compared to epics like TDKR, simply has a smaller scope. The Joker’s goal, for instance, is not full-scale annihilation so much as chaos and terror. There are also fewer characters, and the film is more focused on a singular narrative than multiple converging plot threads. This, to me, is what makes it a great movie. It means it’s not an epic, but again, that’s in no way a bad thing.

  • Alejandro Roggio

    My main gripe with the film was that it contradicts everything established by the last films. It completely reverses the impact that Joker had on Gotham while at the same time “fixing” Bruce Wayne and ridding him of his psychological trauma. In essence, it cheapens the significant of everything that happened in the first films. The film is fine as a stand-alone flick, but it fails as a continuation (and as a finale) to this theatrical saga.

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good!

  • Russell Reynolds

    I’m sorry, there is no way you can support DKR being the best of the trilogy. Apart from the several glaring pot-holes that exist, it also has the huge problem of making big moments revolve around people we are not made to care about. When we find out the Talia is the baddy all along, who cares? She is not important enough. When we find out that Bane is no more than Talia’s bodyguard, and then is killed off quickly and easily, doesn’t this cheapen everything he has done in the film? When we spend almost the entire film following John Blake only for him to drive a bunch of kids to the bridge when all the action finally happens, isn’t this meaningless for a character we actually care about? The use of the name ‘Robin’ was a cheap pay-off to satisfy any future films that may be made, and serves to be inaccurate to the comic books. Some of the flashbacks were completely unnecessary and were purely used to the effect of ‘look, we did actually say that in the first film so there!’ Some people use the argument that Bruce could have never avoided the blast in such a short amount of time, and others say this is irrelevant as it’s a comic book film, therefore allowing no restrictions on the physically possibilities. Well if it is such a comic book film, why is it nothing like one? It is made as a serious movie, so the impossible such as bane punching through a pillar and Bruce magically getting back into Gotham are flawed.The biggest problem with the film is how they decided to describe action instead of showing it. This made it an information fest with no enjoyment whatsoever. Apart from that it was good

  • lifelong-batfan

    To your discussion of this film (and the other two in the trilogy) as an “epic,” I would add a definition often used by English majors like myself: that is, a narration of a particular culture or society’s core values and beliefs, typically in a mythical or larger-than-life fashion, and grounded in events and circumstances that are/were especially meaningful to that group of people at that time.

    While it could be argued that this applies to many different comic book characters, I think it applies most of all to Bruce Wayne/Batman. He is “one of us”; an ordinary American who strives to become more than he is; an innovator, an individual who stubbornly, even self-destructively refuses to acknowledge “the way things are”; an individual who believes absolutely in the power of the individual.

    Brilliant article, and the first I’ve seen that really engages with the film on its own very complicated level.

  • Zee Remorca

    “we can stick to what our hearts tell us and rise above our worst instincts at the same time, and that in so doing, we may truly empower and improve the world around us.”

    this alone makes reading the article worth it.

    Congratulations, Jonathan. You’ve made me a fan. I look forward to reading more of your work :D

  • Hooty

    What a great movie! I don’t think the cat woman character served much of a purpose, but that’s just my thoughts. Like with The Dark Knight, I will be buying this dvd when it’s released and watch it over and over. Good job!

  • Kovaks

    Thanx for such a great read.

  • MariHh97

    THANKS FOR THE ARTICLE! Excellent! LOVE IT

  • John

    Jonathan Lack, and others, who understand the true impact of experiencing a movie like TDKR in a 15/70 mm perf auditorium, and know it is COMPLETELY different from seeing the movie in an auditorium that has been retrofitted to be an “IMAX” theater, need educate moviegoers about the difference more fully.

    I saw TDKR is the IMAX at Lowes Metreon in San Francisco. That screen is 100′ x 85′. The scenes utilizing 15/70mm are AMAZING. Retrofitted IMAX auditoriums using the digital projectors are on screens that are 58′ x 28′, and the clarity of image Lack refers to is nowhere close to what is projected by those 15/70 projectors that IMAX is even removing from some of their auditoriums.

    I hope that I will be able to see TDKR presented in the medium again. Hopefully it will be represented by Blu-ray/DVD in at least some way. They can at least fill our HDTV screens with what is filmed by the IMAX cameras.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joshualepselter Pennybags Lepselter

    When you were discussing the far away prison, you state that fear was the ultimate motivation for Batman, yet when you bring Selina Kyle into the mix, you state that anger is their collective motivation, not fear. Why the change?

    Fantastic article by the way. I was not expecting the entire film to be picked apart so beautifully and masterfully, all the way down to the score. It was worth reading all 10,000 words and more. Please keep this lost talent of writing going for all of us to enjoy for future epics. Thank you.

  • MichaeltheArchangel

    That movie sucked on all accounts. The only people that like this movie are stupid people.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=599459594 Michael Little

      Go jerk off to that goddamn stupid Avengers movie. That movie was dumber than an NFL linebacker. Terrible filmmaking.

  • craig

    Dude, I don’t think Nolan gives a shit about “Occupy Wallstreet”

  • Benjamin

    While the movie has many good points, I thought the script and dialogue had many deficiencies. Every line Alfred spoke, for instance, had my toes curling, even if Michael Caine did his best to salvage them. I also found Bale exceedingly poor in the central role – little charisma and an absolutely ridiculously overdone voice as Batman. Hardy was good, but the plot and the themes juvenile at best.

  • Benjamin

    Furthermore, and perhaps crucially, the scenes between Talia/Tate and Bruce/Batman do not really come off in my oppinion. There is little chemistry between the actors and the characters have little reason for being together. It just felt tagged on and out of place.