10 Marvellous Movie MacGuffins - Part 5
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

10 Marvellous Movie MacGuffins

Alfred Hitchcock is generally credited with coining the term ‘MacGuffin’ - putting a name to an age-old story-telling strategy. Its basic definition is as a plot device that drives the action, and motivates the protagonist of the story. Hitchcock – widely regarded as the master of the MacGuffin movie – famously felt that the nature of the MacGuffin should actually be inconsequential as far as the audience is concerned. For him, the MacGuffin could be anything – it simply serves to further the story. This sentiment was clearly evident in his 1935 film The 39 Steps, in which the titular plot device is mentioned to the protagonist by a mysterious woman at the height of a tense situation, and is not explained further.
This article is over 10 years old and may contain outdated information

The ‘Lotus X Formula’ in One Of Our Dinosaurs Is Missing

Recommended Videos

OneOfOurDinosaursIsMissing

In comedy, the MacGuffin can be used in a way that is slightly different than in drama, and this is brilliantly demonstrated in director Robert Stevenson’s 1975 adaptation of the David Forrest novel, The Great Dinosaur RobberyOne Of Our Dinosaurs Is Missing. Here, the MacGuffin is a microfilm deposited somewhere upon a giant Diplodocus skeleton in the entrance hall of the Natural History Museum in London by Lord Southmere (Derek Nimmo), a Queen’s Messenger.

Lord Southmere is being pursued by a group of Chinese spies who want the microfilm for themselves, because it contains the mysterious ‘Lotus X Formula’. However, while desperately hiding the microfilm on the skeleton before being captured, Lord Southmere crosses paths with his former nanny, Hettie (Helen Hayes) and enlists her assistance. Hettie rallies her nanny-colleagues, who embark on a quest to retrieve the microfilm that involves hiding in a blue whale skeleton, taking on the gang of spies and driving a full-size dinosaur skeleton through the atmospheric, foggy streets of London under cover of darkness.

Throughout the film – notable at the time of its release for featuring a group of capable women saving the day, though it is set within the framework of terrible racism – the nature of the mysterious ‘Lotus X Formula’ is treated as a Hitchcockian MacGuffin, in that it is basically irrelevant. The action motivated by the MacGuffin would be the same, regardless of the content of the microfilm, because it is actually predicated upon the steadfast loyalty of Hettie to her charges, past and present. However, director Stevenson, and writer Bill Walsh deliver the biggest laugh at the end of the film, when they spin the Hitchcock plot device on its head and reveal that the ‘Lotus X Formula’ is actually something entirely unexpected.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sarah Myles
Sarah Myles
Sarah Myles is a freelance writer. Originally from London, she now lives in North Yorkshire with her husband and two children.