7 Reasons Why The LEGO Movie Didn't Destroy Our Childhood - Part 7
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

7 Reasons Why The LEGO Movie Didn’t Destroy Our Childhood

When a film based on LEGO was announced, it was perfectly understandable to have doubts and an aura of pessimism that something sacred was being tinkered with. This isn't just another reboot of a prestigious film after all, it's an adaptation of toys that bear strong sentimental value to childhoods - and even adulthoods - around the world.
This article is over 11 years old and may contain outdated information

2. The Last 15 Minutes

Recommended Videos

the-lego-movie-42-600x251

Without going too far into spoilers, The LEGO Movie goes somewhere during its third act that quite frankly, no one could have expected it to go. There is a decision made here that could have easily crushed the film immediately, slaughtering all the goodwill it had created up until this point. Astonishingly, it was a brilliant idea that separates The LEGO Movie from a good movie with great fun, into an unforgettable masterpiece that will assuredly go down in history as one of the greatest animated films ever.

SPOILERS follow:

Towards the end of the film – for reasons I won’t spoil – it is revealed that the events of the film are the imagination of a child who considers himself to be Emmett, and his father Lord Business. This is also where the motivation for Business begins to make sense, and connect into a much broader and more emotional story. The father doesn’t fancy his child wanting to play around with his meticulously set up LEGO environments. He wants them as they are, or in the case of Lord Business’ nefarious motivations, glued to the ground.

The son has a creative mind and wants to do interesting things with the toys. One could even argue that he wants to play with LEGOs as they were intended to be played with, which is something his father doesn’t understand. Without giving away the entire ending, just understand that viewers of all ages can learn a thing or two from such a weighty, meaningful climax. When people say that The LEGO Movie isn’t just another animated film worth some cheap entertainment, guaranteeing a much deeper message involved, this is the symbolic ending they are referring to.

Major kudos also has to go to Will Ferrell and young Jadon Sand for beautifully illustrating this point.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Robert Kojder
Robert Kojder
I'm wheelchair bound and was diagnosed with Muscular Dystrophy Type 2 at an early age. This has resulted in plenty of free time throughout my life to feverishly experience and write about films, gaming, wrestling, and more.