Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

8 Movie Remakes That Were Completely Unnecessary

We live in an age of the remake. That every film you've ever loved is going to be remade soon is just a fact of life now, and the studio heads pulling the strings couldn't care less how much you complain. That's because they know that, at the end of the day, there's a good chance you'll complain your way into watching the remake of that movie you adore - if only to see how bad it is - and further line their pockets regardless.
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

8) The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

Recommended Videos

If you’re coming to David Fincher’s The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo before Niels Arden Oplev’s original, you’re due for a good couple hours of old-school thriller entertainment. The cast is superb (Rooney Mara in her breakout role, along with Daniel Craig, Robin Wright and Christopher Plummer), the visuals are stunning and the story is gripping (multiple millions of readers can’t be wrong). Unfortunately, someone else got there first.

The only real problem with Fincher’s Dragon Tattoo is that Niels Arden Oplev made his own perfectly good version just two years before Fincher did. It has its own great cast and breakout lead (Noomi Rapace), its own pleasant visuals (this is the same director that established the look for the Fincher-esque Mr. Robot) and the plot is almost beat-for-beat identical.

The only major difference is one comes with subtitles and one doesn’t.

7) Psycho

psycho-vince-vaughn

A similar case to Fincher’s The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, Gus Van Sant’s Psycho was pretty much redundant on arrival for no other reason than that it was almost identical to the original. Van Sant’s film also had the added factor of just not being very well-made. Where Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 Psycho was (and still is) a masterpiece, perfectly measured and intelligently crafted to deliver maximum impact, Van Sant’s Psycho simply isn’t.

There’s nothing more pointless than chasing an already perfect film by deciding to remake it wholesale. 1998’s Psycho is almost shot-for-shot the same movie, but what’s most egregious about it are those changes which Van Sant did decide to make: random shots inserted into the shower sequence, Norman Bates masturbating at the sight of Marion Crane through the hotel walls, and – worst of all – Vince Vaughn taking a part that will always rightfully be that of the great Anthony Perkins.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author