6 Daring Movie Adaptations That Came From Challenging Source Material - Part 5
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

6 Daring Movie Adaptations That Came From Challenging Source Material

Adaptation is a lofty task. In most cases, screenwriters are attempting to take the complexities of hundreds of pages of prose and turn them into a couple of hours of action and dialogue for us to witness people act out. Directors, in turn, often try to capture the tones and meanings behind the source material that has inspired the film. This is not only a big undertaking, the scale of adapting an especially beloved novel or comic or play must be daunting in itself, but it’s a delicate thing. People tend to be finicky when it comes to adaptations. Be too straightforward with it, and people will be bored, finding the movie version redundant if it does nothing to add to the book. But be too bold in your interpretation, straying from the source material or simply using it as a jumping off point for your own artistic intentions, and everyone loses their minds.
This article is over 12 years old and may contain outdated information
[h2]4) The Shining[/h2]

The Shining

Recommended Videos

Stanley Kubrick was pretty famous for his IDGAF attitude, from his all-out assault on film conventions in 2001: A Space Odyssey to his punk rock A Clockwork Orange, all the way up to his final effort on Eyes Wide Shut (Yeah it’s an orgy. DEAL WITH IT). The Shining is an immensely interesting work for countless reasons, but one of these is the fact that Stephen King famously hated it.

I mean, if I was Stephen King I’m sure I would hate Kubrick’s version too. The two apparently have little to do with each other. And that’s because Kubrick was clearly seeking to do something else entirely with his movie than King was attempting in the novel. Most people assume that Kubrick’s intentions were far more high-minded than the novel dared intend, leading to all sorts of elaborate theories about what the movie means and the detail with which it treats its subjects (for a good sample of some of the absurd lengths people go to defend their theories, watch the terrific documentary Room 237). It’s certainly an adaptation that favors the impressionistic over story and subjectivity over narrative clarity, which for a film to attempt is always somewhat audacious, especially when it comes to source material that has a different perception. But this is one example of a film generally thought of as masterful taking its adaptive work and making it entirely its own thing.

Continue reading on the next page…


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy