Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Extraction

Extraction Director Explains The Film’s Confusing Ending

Extraction director Sam Hargrave explains his decision not to go for a classic happy or sad ending and conclude the movie on an ambiguous note.
This article is over 4 years old and may contain outdated information

With millions of people still cooped up at home due to the Coronavirus with plenty of free time on their hands, Netflix’s Extraction has been generating a lot of buzz since it dropped on the streaming platform yesterday, with fans seeming to get a real kick out of seeing Chris Hemsworth headlining an old-school action movie with a high body count and no superheroics in sight.

Recommended Videos

Sam Hargrave’s feature debut instantly establishes him as a name to watch in the action genre, with Extraction basically 117 minutes of wall-to-wall set-pieces that throw everything except the kitchen sink at Hemsworth’s Tyler Rake. While it doesn’t exactly reinvent the wheel when it comes to the story, and the vast majority of the plot beats are the same things we’ve seen in countless similar movies over the years, the expertly-staged choreography and often brutal violence are what set it apart from the pack.

Netflix seem to have franchise potential in mind for Tyler Rake, too, and one of the most hotly-discussed aspects of Extraction is the ending. After seemingly suffering a fatal gunshot wound, the grizzled veteran drops off a bridge with what appears to be his last ounce of strength, with the movie poised to end on a real downer.

However, the final shot of the film shows a character that remains deliberately out of focus, meaning that Hemsworth may or not be returning to shoot, stab and maim more bad guys in the future. In a recent interview, Hargrave explained the decision to end Extraction on such an ambiguous note, admitting that the real ending is whatever the viewer wants it to be.

“What would hopefully happen, is people will be discussing that afterwards, and you get to say which one you feel is right for you… We want to appeal to as many people as possible without compromising the integrity of the story. And so, we think a pretty good compromise is to make an ambiguous ending.  If people on one hand feel like the story is complete and is a story of redemption through sacrifice, then for them, it’ll be where the kid is imagining, and then now you go, ‘Yes, I’m satisfied.’ If you feel like you love Tyler Rake, and you love Chris Hemsworth, and you want a sequel, and you’re like ‘There’s no way, you can’t kill him!’ then that’s Tyler Rake standing there looking at you. So we kind of purposefully did not pull focus to the character standing there.”

The endings to most action movies tend to be pretty black-and-white, so it’s refreshing to see Extraction try something a little different. We’ll just have to leave it up to you though to decide if Tyler Rake survived or not.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
related content
Related Content
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves; Words. Lots of words.