Godzilla: 6 Flaws To Correct For The Sequels - Part 3
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

6 Flaws To Correct For The Godzilla Sequels

Let's get one thing straight, Gareth Edwards' version of Godzilla is far from a bad movie, it's actually a wholly worthwhile one that captures the essence of what a Godzilla film should be, unlike a certain piece of garbage from 1998. The destruction is off the charts as areas of Japan, Hawaii, Las Vegas, and San Francisco are all completely levelled; with the chaos elegantly shot from street-level camera-work that really puts into perspective just how large these creatures are and just how much damage they are inflicting.
This article is over 11 years old and may contain outdated information

Drab Human Personalities

Recommended Videos

godzilla-aaron-taylor-johnson

Continuing along with the previous point, there really isn’t a single worthwhile, entertaining, or relatable character in the film left once Bryan Cranston dies. In some ways, the fact that the characters don’t overshadow the presence of the monsters is a sign that the filmmakers knew what moviegoers wanted to see when attending a screening of a movie called Godzilla, but giving them nothing engaging whatsoever to do is just as harmful. These are characters that are eating up a lot of screen time, yet doing a whole lot of nothing.

For example, the amount of depth for the film’s actual human protagonist in Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s Ford Brody character is that he’s an expert at bomb disposal, and wrapped into this situation because of his parents. He also has a wife played by the talented Elizabeth Olsen and a child, but neither have any relevance to the story or have a single memorable scene. In general, this film has a cast full of fantastic actors that essentially do nothing. The only character that genuinely seem to serve a purpose throughout the film is Ken Watanabe’s scientist character that exists to drop exposition every once in a while. He’s still pretty irrelevant to the story, but at least there’s something here.

What truly stands out, however, is that if multiple characters are completely cut from the film, nothing of value would be lost. If anything, the movie would just go by quicker and have better pacing.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Robert Kojder
Robert Kojder
I'm wheelchair bound and was diagnosed with Muscular Dystrophy Type 2 at an early age. This has resulted in plenty of free time throughout my life to feverishly experience and write about films, gaming, wrestling, and more.