Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
The Joker

Impractical Joker: Why Jared Leto Failed Us In Suicide Squad

Recognition of the Joker's significance stretches back to the character's first appearance in April of 1940, when a last-minute editorial move saved the Clown Prince of Crime from a swift exit from Batman lore. Bill Finger, co-creator of the Caped Crusader himself, initially expressed a desire to kill off the villainous jokester before his ever-wise editor, Whitney Ellsworth, demanded that the character live on. And live on he has.
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information
Recommended Videos

Sadly, of all the actors who’ve taken the dive into the character’s perversion, Leto’s hollow, hateful Joker may be the weakest portrayal we’ve seen yet. It’s a steep dive, to be sure, one that requires the performer to consider the darkest corners of the human psyche and operate from that darkness with unmistakable aplomb. It’s unfortunate, then, that his performance lacks both conviction and competence, instead coming off as a desperate, desire-driven audition that casts a pall over the film’s proceedings in a big, distracting way.

Somewhere amidst the clutter and the chaos, he loses the dangerous edge that makes the Joker so fun and fearsome. He loses part of what makes the Joker…the Joker. Here, he’s just a slick-haired, silver-grilled criminal with the hots for Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn and a penchant for wanton destruction (which, admittedly, keeps him close to the character’s roots). That’s really all there is to him, and that’s a shame.

Beneath Leto’s need to emulate Ledger lies a performance that could’ve meant something within the context of the DCEU (DC Extended Universe). With layers (and emotions) stacked sky-high, Leto’s Joker possessed potential that he squanders the second he steps onscreen, alternating between gangster and lover before reverting back to the former for the rest of the film.

Why not expand on the loving, lustful side of the Joker? And why give us something we’ve seen a better version of in a better movie instead? He’s not consistent and he’s not compelling, so what exactly can he bring to a movie that so desperately needed him to show up? All he does is show off. This is the Joker we’re getting for the foreseeable future, and so far, he hasn’t delivered.

His performance functions as a bad impression of Ledger, whose Tom Waits-inspired Joker introduced us to a new version of the character that, for many, became the definitive iteration. Leto won’t enjoy the cultural clout that Ledger has posthumously earned, and it’s unlikely that he will endure or endear himself as anything other than a wannabe who played to someone else’s strengths.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author