Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
1408

John Cusack Would Love To Make A Sequel To 1408

You can't go anywhere these days without bumping into a Stephen King adaptation, as the prolific author's work is constantly mined for new movies and TV shows, a trend that's been going on for over 40 years at this point. The results have been about as inconsistent as you'd expect, bringing us classics like The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile along with disasters such as The Dark Tower and Dreamcatcher, but 1408 remains one of the most severely underrated.
This article is over 3 years old and may contain outdated information

You can’t go anywhere these days without bumping into a Stephen King adaptation, as the prolific author’s work is constantly mined for new movies and TV shows, a trend that’s been going on for over 40 years at this point. The results have been about as inconsistent as you’d expect, bringing us classics like The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile along with disasters such as The Dark Tower and Dreamcatcher, but 1408 remains one of the most severely underrated.

Recommended Videos

The psychological thriller is a good old-fashioned two hander starring John Cusack and Samuel L. Jackson, with the plot following an author who specializes in debunking the supernatural. After checking into a hotel and failing to heed the warnings of the manager, a stay in a supposedly haunted room leads to a series of bizarre and unexplainable events.

1408

Both Cusack and Jackson deliver solid performances, and 1408 scored generally enthusiastic reviews from critics and was a modest success at the box office, where it raked in almost $135 million against a $25 million production budget. One of the more overlooked entries in the Stephen King back catalogue, Cusack admitted in a recent interview that he’d love the chance to return for a sequel, saying:

“I haven’t really done sequels as much. I did a couple of loose sequels, where I felt like I had something else to say with the character but you can’t get the rights, so you just do another version of it. I did that a couple of times. I always thought there was another version of 1408, where he could wake up back in the room and continue on. That’s just getting into that Stephen King headspace. He’s such a terrific writer, and I do love like that Rod Serling psychological horror.”

The 54 year-old recently suggested a third ending for the movie in addition to the one tacked onto the theatrical version and the one attached to the Special Edition home video release that a lot of people prefer. But regardless of what conclusion makes for the better one, with the King renaissance still in full flow, there are far worse ideas out there than bringing back John Cusack to reprise his role in a long-delayed sequel to 1408.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
related content
Related Content
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves; Words. Lots of words.
twitter