Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Producer Of Roland Emmerich’s Godzilla Explains Why The Film Flopped

As details continue to trickle out regarding next year’s Godzilla: King of the Monsters, the producer and writer of Roland Emmerich’s oft-reviled 1998 Godzilla shares his perspective on why this earlier attempt at bringing the legendary beast to Hollywood missed the mark.
This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

As details continue to trickle out regarding next year’s Godzilla: King of the Monsters, the producer and writer of Roland Emmerich’s oft-reviled 1998 Godzilla shares his perspective on why this earlier attempt at bringing the legendary beast to Hollywood missed the mark.

Recommended Videos

Dean Devlin, who’s collaborated with Emmerich on several projects including Independence Day and Stargate, believes that one issue with their version of the city-leveling lizard is that they regarded their subject as, well, just a lizard.

“Roland and I made an intellectual idea that was interesting but not compelling filmmaking. We said in real life, a lizard is neither evil nor good, it’s just a lizard. So what if one got to that size and in its effort to survive, it threatened us, but it wasn’t mad at us?

It was just simply doing what it did and it causes this problem for us. Well, that’s interesting, but that’s not Godzilla. If you go to the very first movie, Gojira, it was an evil monster. Movies after that, it was a hero. We didn’t choose either.”


While it could certainly be argued that the critically panned Razzie-winner had bigger problems than this (plus any blockbuster filmmaking advice from the director of Geostorm should maybe be taken with a pinch of salt), Devlin raises an interesting point. Given how many films in this series have the word ‘vs.’ in the title, it’s clear that much of the franchise’s appeal stems from its literally outsized conflicts as gargantuan creatures duke it out over the fate of the world. It’s hard for things to get too emotionally heated when the only monster in the fray is a mere docile reptile who just happened to suffer the inconvenience of getting really, really big.

To make a monster movie with a neutral animal as the monster may not have been a bad idea in itself, but it certainly wasn’t true to the spirit of the iconic property. Perhaps it’s appropriate then that Emmerich’s take on the 64-year-old beast was later rebranded in future Godzilla releases as its own creature named ‘Zilla,’ a separate character from the star of the franchise.

With King of the Monsters set to pitch its titular behemoth against a whole host of classic creatures from the series, it thankfully looks like the upcoming film will be offering a more traditional and fan-pleasing take on the scaly kaiju than the 1998 Godzilla did when it hits cinemas on May 31st, 2019.

We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy