5 Films That Had A Better Theatrical Cut Than Director's Cut - Part 6
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Watchmen 2009 cast
Image via Warner Bros.

5 Films That Had A Better Theatrical Cut Than Director’s Cut

In the world of the film fan, there is often the sense that the director’s cut of a movie is the more desirable version, since the term implies that it is more closely aligned with the vision of the individual at the helm of the production. The cinephile is expected to have at least seen the director’s cut of classic movies, or their favourite movies, if not have a well-rounded, reasoned opinion about it. While the director’s cut is seen as the more artistically pure version, the theatrical cut is often regarded as being the commercial cut – the studio-approved, corporate version released for mass consumption.
This article is over 10 years old and may contain outdated information

Aliens (1986)

Recommended Videos

In and of itself, Aliens is an outstanding achievement. It is a sequel to a massively successful genre film, and yet manages to be its own entity. It contains a lead female performance that is so strong, it generated one of the only Best Actress Academy Award nominations for science fiction and, in doing so, gave Sigourney Weaver her first Oscar nomination. The story picked up the tale of Ellen Ripley, but this time had her wake from hypersleep to the news that the planet where she faced the alien has been colonized, and all contact with the colonists has been lost. With James Cameron at the helm, Aliens proved to be another flawless action film.

But, in 1992, a special edition was released in which the director had restored seventeen minutes of footage. The footage involved scenes of ‘Newt’ – the young girl on the alien planet – and her family discovering the downed spacecraft that would ultimately spell their doom, Ripley receiving news of the her daughter’s death – the tragic loss having occurred while Ripley was in hyper-sleep – and a number of extended dialogue sequences. There is also a scene in which the space marines use armed sentry robots in their fight against the Xenomorphs.

Taken individually, these scenes range in quality. The scenes involving Newt and her family, while atmospheric, bring nothing to the process of building tension within the narrative. The scene in which Ripley learns of the death of her daughter is a powerful one, thanks to Sigourney Weaver’s intimidating performance, but it adds nothing that is necessary to a script that is otherwise tight and free of surplus material. In fact, it can be argued that its omission better serves the story by making the reason behind Ripley’s connection to Newt less obvious.

The only addition that brings something to the film is the space marines’ use of armed sentry robots. This is an effective scene that creates a great deal of tension, while keeping pace with the rest of the movie. Collectively, however, the seventeen additional minutes make the Aliens director’s cut of 1992 a lesser film than the original.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sarah Myles
Sarah Myles
Sarah Myles is a freelance writer. Originally from London, she now lives in North Yorkshire with her husband and two children.