Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

A Tribute To Roger Ebert From A Lifelong Disciple

Roger Ebert was a man I always wanted to meet. Not necessarily to pick his brain about movies – his body of work, all of it easily accessible online, said enough – or politics – he was one of America’s best and most underrated political writers – but to simply say “thank you,” and let him know, face to face, what his work meant to me, my writing, and my life. For without ever literally conversing with him, Roger Ebert was a major, essential influence to me, a hero and a mentor for whom I had nearly limitless respect and admiration, someone I not only looked up to, but whose spirit I have tried to emulate throughout my critical career.
This article is over 11 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

Secondly, I owe Ebert gratitude for all the wonderful lessons he taught me through his reviews. More than just how to write about movies, I so often found new ways to watch and analyze films through his work. Most notably, the notion that “movies made for ‘everybody’ are really made for nobody in particular” is a personal mantra of mine, even though I have now forgotten which of Ebert’s reviews the quote came from. Ebert did not present a huge number of radical notions about filmmaking, but he presented the basic ideas more clearly and powerfully than any other film critic, living or dead.

Thirdly, and a bit more trivially, I should thank Ebert for the name I borrowed from him for the better part of seven years now. When I was brought on by The Denver Post’s YourHub to write movie reviews in 2007, I named my blog Jonathan Lack at the Movies, because I could think of nothing else. Siskel and Ebert’s show, though I was only slightly familiar with it, simply popped into my head, and I carried it with me through my YourHub days and on to my own website, founded in 2011, not leaving it behind until I joined the staff of We Got This Covered.

These are things I shall never get to thank Roger Ebert for, and that saddens me. I wish I could tell him how much he meant to me, and I how much I now miss him, even though he has been gone less than a day. Even these past few months, when he has been writing less and less, have felt a little melancholy without regular blog entries and reviews (those blog entries deserve several long tribute articles themselves, as they were consistently moving windows into Ebert’s mind). As a lover of film, the world simply feels less full with Roger Ebert alive to survey the cinematic landscape and report his findings. He was the best of us, and remains so, even in death.

He was also, of course, the most graceful of film critics, and of writers. He ended yesterday’s blog post with these words, the last he would ever publish as living man, and they say it all better than I ever could:

“So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I’ll see you at the movies.”

Thank you Roger. See you there.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jonathan R. Lack
Jonathan R. Lack
With ten years of experience writing about movies and television, including an ongoing weekly column in The Denver Post's YourHub section, Jonathan R. Lack is a passionate voice in the field of film criticism. Writing is his favorite hobby, closely followed by watching movies and TV (which makes this his ideal gig), and is working on his first film-focused book.